CCA 1310038: Section 7212(a) is not an appropriate way to gain access to a restricted community
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advised that a revenue officer should not cite IRC § 7212(a) to help gain entry to a restricted-access community. The provision requires corrupt conduct, an endeavor, and an intent to obstruct or impede the administration of the internal revenue laws. Counsel stated that a security guard, resident, or other entity denying entry would be highly unlikely to meet that standard.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May a revenue officer use IRC § 7212(a) to gain entry to a restricted-access community?
- Outcome: Advice given, the provision is not appropriate for that purpose on the stated facts.
- Key authorities: IRC § 7212(a)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2013010214435650 Number: 201310038
Release Date: 3/8/2013
Office: ----------
UILC: 7603.01-00
From: -----------------------
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 2:43:58 PM
To: ----------------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: Gated Community Access
It is not appropriate for a revenue officer to cite IRC 7212(a) to help gain entry to a
restricted access community. Section 7212(a) provides that whoever (1) corruptly or by
force or threats of force ... endeavors to intimidate or impede any officer or employee of
the United States acting in an official capacity under this title”, or (2) “in any other way
corruptly or by force of threats of force... obstructs or impedes, or endeavors to instruct
or impede, the due administration of this title” shall, upon conviction, face monetary
fines and imprisonment. The plain language of the statute requires proof that the
defendant (1) corruptly, (2) endeavored, (3) to obstruct or impede the due administration
of the Internal Revenue laws. The courts have interpreted the term “corruptly” to mean
performed with the intention to secure an unlawful benefit for oneself or for another. It is
highly unlikely that the action of a security guard, third-party resident, or other entity
denying a revenue officer entry would rise to the level of “corruptly” as defined by the
courts.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.