CCA 201310030: IRS advanced a case based on evidence later viewed as tainted
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
In a brief internal message, Chief Counsel stated that the Service could no longer describe the situation as “no harm, no foul” because it had taken action and advanced the case based on tainted evidence. The release does not provide further facts or analysis.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: How should the Service characterize action taken after relying on tainted evidence?
- Outcome: Advice given, the Service could not treat the matter as harmless after advancing the case.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 7602 and 7609
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA-127127-12 Number: 201310030
Release Date: 3/8/2013
Office: --------------
UILC: 7602.07-02, 7609.02-00
From: ------------------------
Sent: Friday January 26, 2012 4:46 PM
To: ----------------------
Cc: ------------------------
Subject: Scan to answer questions ---------
---------------------------------------------- We can no longer say it is no harm - no foul,
because we took action and advanced the case based on tainted evidence. Thanks, ---
----
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace