Private Letter Ruling 1309001 Released March 1, 2013 Approved

PLR 1309001: Couple received extra time for Canadian pension elections

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered a married couple's request for more time to elect the treatment provided by Revenue Procedure 2002-23 for Canadian registered pension and retirement savings accounts. It found that the taxpayers acted reasonably and in good faith and that the government's interests would not be prejudiced. The taxpayers received 60 days from the ruling letter's date to make the elections. The extension did not decide whether they were otherwise eligible for that treatment.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayers receive an extension of time to make elections for Canadian pension and retirement accounts?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 9114 and 9100; Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-23

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201309001 [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 3/1/2013 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 9114.03-06
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------, ID No. ---------------------
-------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:BR1
PLR-111527-12
Date:
November 26, 2012

              -------------------

LEGEND

Husband = ------------------------------

Wife = -------------------------

RPP1 = -------------------------------------------

RPP2 = --------------------------------------------------------

RPP3 = -------------------------------------------

RRSP = ------------------------------------

Country A = ------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Year 3 = -------

Year 4 = -------
PLR-111527-12 2

Year 5 = -------

Year 6 = -------

Year 7 = -------

Year 8 = -------

Tax Years =

Dear ---------------------------------------:

This is in reply to a letter dated March 14, 2012, as amended by supplemental
information dated and July 06, 2012, requesting an extension of time under Treas. Reg.
§ 301.9100-3 for Husband and Wife (Taxpayers) to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc.
2002-23, 2002-1 C.B. 7444, for Tax Years.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

FACTS

Husband was born and educated in Canada. In Year 1, Husband began contributing to
a Canadian registered pension plan, RPP1. In Year 2, Husband began making annual
contributions to a Canadian registered retirement savings plan RRSP and also to a
second Canadian registered pension plan, RPP2. Wife was born in Country A and
moved to Canada to complete graduate studies and began teaching. In Year 3, Wife
obtained Permanent Residency in Canada and subsequently obtained her Canadian
citizenship in Year 4. In Year 5, Wife began contributing to a Canadian registered
pension plan, RPP3.

Taxpayers moved to the United States in Year 6 to further their careers. In Year 7,
Taxpayers obtained their green cards and retained their Canadian citizenship.
Taxpayers have never made any withdrawals from the RRSP or RPPs since the
accounts were opened.

Taxpayers were not aware of the need to make an election pursuant to paragraph 7 of
Article XVIII of the United States – Canada Income Tax Treaty in order to defer U.S. tax
on income accrued in RRSP, RPP1, RPP2, and RPP3. They had initially relied on a
tax preparer and later used the preparer’s software to prepare their returns. However,
neither the preparer nor its software addressed this issue. In Year 8, Husband became
PLR-111527-12 3

aware that they may not have fully complied with new IRS rules about Canadian RRSP
and RPP accounts and sought professional advice from tax attorneys with experience in
international issues.

Taxpayers state that the Internal Revenue Service has not communicated with them
concerning RRSP, RPP 1, RPP 2 or RPP 3 or the lack of an election pursuant to Rev
Proc. 2002-23.

RULING REQUESTED

Whether Taxpayers may receive an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3
for Taxpayers to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, 2002-1 C.B. 744, for Tax
Years.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief
in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is
prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will
be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that
the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice
the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the election provided in Rev. Proc. 2002-23 is a regulatory
election within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the
Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100–1(c) to grant
Taxpayers an extension of time, provided that Taxpayers satisfy the standards set forth
in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).

Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that
Taxpayers satisfy the standards of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. Accordingly, Taxpayers
are granted an extension of time until 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to make
elections for Tax Years under Rev. Proc. 2002-23. As provided in Treas. Reg.
§ 301.9100-1(a), the granting of an extension of time is not a determination that
Taxpayers are otherwise eligible to make the above-described election.
PLR-111527-12 4

Pursuant to section 4.07 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, the election once made cannot be
revoked except with the consent of the Commissioner. For Tax Years, Taxpayers must
file amended U.S. income tax returns to which they attach a Form 8891 (U.S.
Information Return for Beneficiaries of Certain Canadian Registered Retirement Plans)
for RRSP and copies of the statement described in section 4.01 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23
for each RPP that Taxpayers have an interest in. For each subsequent tax year
through the tax year in which a final distribution is made from RRSP, Taxpayers must
attach a Form 8891 for the RRSP to their U.S. income tax return. For each subsequent
tax year through the tax year in which Taxpayers have each received a final distribution
from an RPP, each Taxpayer who has not received a final distribution from RPP must
attach a copy of the statement described in section 4.01 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23 for RPP
to their U.S. income tax return.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Powers of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

                                       Sincerely,


                                       Quyen Huynh
                                       Senior Counsel, Branch 1
                                       Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (International)

Enclosure (1)
Copy for 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.