Chief Counsel Advice 1307006 Released February 15, 2013 Advice

CCA 1307006: IRS may not offset employees' FICA refund shares against an employer's liabilities

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice addresses refunds of overpaid FICA taxes in medical-resident cases where a hospital or other employer claims both its own share and consenting employees' shares. The advice states that section 6402(a) permits the IRS to offset the employer's share against the employer's other tax liabilities, but does not authorize offsetting the employees' share against the employer's separate liabilities. If such an employee-share offset occurs, the advice states that the IRS should reverse the improper credit, while noting related guidance on correcting mathematical or clerical errors and using Internal Revenue Manual procedures.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the IRS offset employees' shares of a FICA overpayment against the employer's separate tax liabilities?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6402(a)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2012062114582047 Number: 201307006
Release Date: 2/15/2013
Office: --------------
UILC: 6402.01-00

From: -----------------------
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 2:58:34 PM
To: --------------------
Cc: -----------------------------------------------------------
Subject: FW: ------------------------(Refund claims for FICA for Medical Residnents)

You asked for guidance on an issue that has arisen in the context of refunds of overpaid FICA taxes in
medical resident cases. In these cases, a hospital/employer may have filed a claim for refund of overpaid
FICA tax for both its (employer) share and on behalf of consenting medical resident employees, for their
share. Under the FICA refund scheme, the employer acts as a fiduciary in bringing the refund claim on
behalf of consenting employees, but the refund is actually paid to the employer, who is then supposed to
give the entitled employees their share.

Because the overpayment is issued in the name of the employer, under the normal systemic processing
of overpayments, an overpayment applied to an employer's account would ordinarily be offset against any
tax liabilities for other periods in accordance with section 6402(a). Section 6402(a) permits (does not
mandate) the Service to credit the amount of any overpayment against any tax liability "on the part of the
person who made the overpayment" and "shall" (subject to 6402(c)-(f)) refund the balance to such
person. Thus, section 6402(a) only permits the employer share of the overpayment to be credited against
that employer's tax liability for other periods. Accordingly, the IRS does not have the legal authority to
offset the employees' share of an overpayment against an employer's separate tax liability.

Should such an offset occur, since the IRS would not have the legal authority to make the offset, the IRS
would need to reverse the overpayment credit with respect to the employees' share. We have not found
any direct authority addressing offsets of FICA tax for these types of overpayments. There is advice
discussing the Taxpayer Advocate’s lack of authority to order reversal of a properly made overpayment
credit so the IRS could issue a refund to the taxpayer on grounds of hardship. IRS SCA 199913028; IRS
SCA 200132034. (The Taxpayer Advocate does not have this authority because once the credit is made,
there is no longer an existing "overpayment" which can be refunded.) In the case of an offset of
employee overpayment against employer liability, however, the credit would not be proper with respect to
the employees' share. The CCAs discuss the exception to the general prohibition on reversing offsets to
correct a mathematical/clerical error and also discuss the IRM provisions in 21.4 which can be used to
reverse/override offsets.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please let me know if I can be of further assistance.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.