PLR 201307004: IRS grants more time to elect out of automatic GST exemption allocation

Number
201307004
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Special Rules for Allocation of GST Exemption
Code sections
§ 2513, § 2601, § 2611, § 2612, § 2613, § 2631, § 2632, § 2641, § 2642, § 6110
Ruling dated
October 26, 2012
Publicly released
February 15, 2013

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A married couple created an irrevocable trust for grandchildren and made a transfer to it. Their tax preparers filed the gift tax returns but failed to make the election that would prevent automatic allocation of the couple’s generation-skipping transfer tax exemption to the transfer. The IRS concluded that the taxpayers acted reasonably and in good faith because they relied on a qualified tax professional, and that granting relief would not prejudice the government. It therefore granted 120 additional days to make the election, effective as of the transfer date.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayers make a late election out of automatic allocation of GST exemption to a trust transfer?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2513, 2632(b)(3), 2642(g); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Third Party Communication: None
Number: 201307004
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Release Date: 2/15/2013
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------------------
Index Number: 2632.00-00, 2642.00-00,
----------------------------------------
9100.00-00
Telephone Number:
---------------------
--------------------------
Refer Reply To:
-----------------------------------
CC:PSI:B04
----------------------------
PLR-144955-12
Date: OCTOBER 26, 2012

Re: ---------------------------

Legend

Husband
------------------------------------------------------
Wife
----------------------------------------------------
Date 1
--------------------------
Date 2
--------------------------
Date 3
-----------------------
Year
-------
Accountants
--------------------------------
Trust
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
a
--------------

Dear ----------------------:

This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated March 14, 2012 requesting an extension of time under § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to elect out of the generation-skipping transfer (GST) exemption automatic allocation rules.

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:

On Date 1, Husband and Wife established an irrevocable trust, Trust, for the benefit of their three grandchildren and future grandchildren. Husband transferred $a to Trust on Date 2.

Husband and Wife retained Accountants to prepare the Forms 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Returns for Year. On the Forms 709, Husband and Wife consented to treat the gift to Trust made in Year as being made one-half by each pursuant to § 2513. Husband and Wife intended that no portion of their available GST exemption be used in connection with the transfer.

PLR-144955-12
2

Accountants prepared the Forms 709 but failed to make the proper written election out of the automatic allocation rules under § 2632(b) on the Forms 709. The Forms 709 were timely filed on Date 3.

You have requested an extension of time under § 2642(g) and § 301.9100-3 to elect out of the automatic allocation of GST exemption with respect to the Year transfer to Trust.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 2513(a)(1) provides that a gift made by one spouse to any person other than the donor's spouse is considered for purposes of the gift tax as made one-half by the donor and one-half by the donor's spouse, but only if at the time of the gift each spouse is a citizen or resident of the United States.

Section 2513(a)(2) provides that the gift is treated as made one-half by each spouse only if both spouses have signified (under the regulations provided for in subsection (b)), their consent to the application of § 2513(a)(1) in the case of all gifts made during the calendar year by either while married to each other.

Section 2513(b)(2)(A) provides that the consent under section 2513(a)(2) may be signified at any time after the close of the calendar year in which the gift was made. However, the consent may not be signified after the 15th of April following the close of such year, unless before the 15th day no return has been filed for such year by either spouse, in which case the consent may not be signified after a return for such year is filled by either spouse.

Section 2601 provides that a tax is imposed on every generation-skipping transfer.
Section 2611(a) provides that the term "generation-skipping transfer" means: (1) a taxable distribution; (2) a taxable termination; and (3) a direct skip.

Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax imposed by § 2601 is the taxable amount multiplied by the applicable rate.

Section 2612(c) provides that the term "direct skip" means a transfer subject to a tax imposed by chapter 11 or 12 of an interest in property to a skip person.

Section 2613(a) provides, in part, that the term "skip person" means a trust, if all interests in such trust are held by skip persons.

Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption amount which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the transferor.

PLR-144955-12
3

Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable.

Section 2631(c) provides that, for purposes of § 2631(a), the GST exemption amount for any calendar year shall be equal to the applicable exclusion amount under § 2010(c) for such calendar year.

Section 2632(a)(1) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her GST exemption may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual's estate, regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed. Section 2632(a)(2) provides that the manner in which allocations are to be made shall be prescribed by forms or regulations issued by the Secretary.

Section 2632(b)(1) provides that if any individual makes a direct skip during his lifetime, any unused portion of such individual's GST exemption shall be allocated to the property transferred to the extent necessary to make the inclusion ratio for such property zero (automatic allocation). If the amount of the direct skip exceeds such unused portion, the entire unused portion shall be allocated to the property transferred.

Section 2632(b)(2) provides that for purposes of § 2632(b)(1), the unused portion of an individual's GST exemption is that portion of such exemption which has not previously been allocated by such individual (or treated as allocated under § 2632(b)(1) or § 2632(c)(1)).

Section 2632(b)(3) provides that an individual may elect to have the automatic allocation rule of § 2632(b)(1) not apply to a transfer.

Section 2641(a) defines the applicable rate as the product of the maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.

Section 2641(b) provides that the term "maximum Federal estate tax rate" means the maximum rate imposed by § 2001 on the estates of decedents dying at the time of the taxable distribution, taxable termination, or direct skip, as the case may be.

Section 302(c) of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (TRUIRJCA), P.L. 111-312 (124 Stat. 3296), provides that in the case of any GST made after December 31, 2009, and before January 1, 2011, the applicable rate determined under § 2641(a) shall be zero.

Under § 2642(a)(1), the inclusion ratio with respect to any property transferred in a generation-skipping transfer is the excess (if any) of 1 over the applicable fraction. The applicable fraction, as defined in § 2642(a)(2), is a fraction, the numerator of which

PLR-144955-12
4

is the amount of the GST exemption under § 2631 allocated to the trust (or to property transferred in a direct skip), and the denominator of which is the value of the property transferred to the trust (or involved in the direct skip), reduced by the sum of any federal estate tax or state death tax actually recovered from the trust attributable to such property, and any charitable deduction allowed under § 2055 or 2522 with respect to such property.

Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides, generally, that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election under § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of this paragraph.

Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under § 2642(g)(1), the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that, under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust as a generation-skipping transfer trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section 301.9100-1(a).

Section 301.9100-2 provides an automatic extension of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election whose date is prescribed by a regulation (and not expressly provided by statute). In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides, in part, that requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides, in part, except as provided in § 301.9100-(b)(3)(i) through (iii), that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly, you are granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to make an election under § 2632(b)(3) that the automatic allocation rules do not apply to the Year transfer to Trust. The election out will be effective as of Date 2. The election should be made on a supplemental Form 709 for Year. The Form 709 should be filed with the Cincinnati Service Center at the following address: Internal Revenue Service, Cincinnati Service Center - Stop 82, Cincinnati, OH 45999. You should attach a copy of this letter to the supplemental Form 709. We have enclosed a copy for this purpose.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we have sent a copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.

Except as expressly provided herein, we neither express nor imply any opinion concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

PLR-144955-12
6

This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

_______
Lorraine Gardner
Senior Counsel, Branch 4
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures
Copy for § 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace