PLR 201305006: IRS treats a contractual joint venture as a foreign business entity

Number
201305006
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Joint Ventures
Code sections
§ 367, § 6110, § 7701
Ruling dated
October 15, 2012
Publicly released
February 1, 2013

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer planned to enter into a profit participation agreement with an affiliate for the operation of branches outside the United States. The agreement would give the affiliate an interest in the branches' capital, profits, losses, and management, without creating a separate entity under local law. The IRS ruled that the agreement would create a separate business entity for federal tax purposes and that the entity would be foreign. Income and expenses properly allocable to the business would be treated as those of the separate entity. The IRS did not rule on the application of § 367 or whether the entity was eligible for classification under § 301.7701-3.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does a contractual profit-sharing arrangement create a separate foreign business entity for federal tax purposes?
  • Outcome: Approved, the arrangement creates a separate foreign business entity.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 367 and 6110; Treas. Reg. §§ 301.7701-1, 301.7701-2, 301.7701-3, and 301.7701-5

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201305006
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/1/2013
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 7701.02-02
Person To Contact:
--------------------------
----------------------, ID No. -----------------
---------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------
---------------------
------------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-140969-11
Date:
October 15, 2012

Legend

Taxpayer = ------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------

Parent = ------------------
-------------------------------------------

Affiliate = ---------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------

State = -------------

Country = -----------------

Entity = --------------------------------------------------------------

Region = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------

X = ----

Courts = ----------------------------------------------------------

Dear ----------------:

This letter responds to a letter, dated September 30, 2011, written by Taxpayer’s authorized representative on behalf of Taxpayer, requesting a private letter ruling
PLR-140969-11
2

concerning the classification for federal tax purposes of a joint venture between Taxpayer and Affiliate.

According to the information submitted, Taxpayer is a corporation organized under the laws of State, and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. Affiliate is an Entity organized under the laws of Country A and is wholly owned by Taxpayer.

Taxpayer intends to enter into a joint venture with Affiliate by executing a Profit Participation Agreement (the “Agreement”) under which Affiliate will acquire a X% interest in the capital of all of Taxpayer’s branches in Region in return for a cash investment equal to X% of the overall fair market value of the Region branches. Affiliate will also acquire a X% interest in the profits and losses from all business operations of the branches in the Region.

No separate juridical legal entity will be created as a result of the agreement and thus Taxpayer will retain legal ownership of all assets, liabilities, and contractual obligations of the Region branches.

Taxpayer has provided the following representations in connection with its request for a private letter ruling.

(a) The Agreement will be signed outside the United States.

(b) The Agreement will provide that it will be governed by the laws of Country (the “Governing Law Provision”).

(c) The Agreement will provide that Taxpayer and the Affiliate consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of Courts with respect to any matter or action arising out of or in connection with the Agreement (the “Exclusive Jurisdiction Provision”).

(d) The rights and obligations of Taxpayer and the Affiliate under the Agreement will be legally binding under the laws of Country and will be enforceable in Courts.
The performance of such obligations will not conflict with the laws of Country.

(e) The Governing Law Provision will be valid and legally binding under the law of Country and would be recognized by the courts of Country in a legal action brought by Taxpayer or Affiliate against the other party.

(f) The Exclusive Jurisdiction Provision will be valid and legally binding under the law of Country and would be recognized by the courts of Country in a legal action brought by Taxpayer or Affiliate against the other party.

(g) The Affiliate will be entitled to nominate one member of a 10-member committee that will oversee the operations and management of the Region branches (the
PLR-140969-11
3

“Management Committee”). All meetings of the Management Committee will take place outside of the United States.

(h) Taxpayer will elect to treat the resulting separate business entity as a corporation pursuant to § 301.7701-3(c).

(i) For all applicable federal tax purposes, Taxpayer will report the formation of the resulting separate business entity and its ongoing operations in a manner consistent with the rulings set forth below, including, but not limited to, the filing of, and furnishing of all required information on, Form 926 (Return by a U.S.
Transferor of Property to a Foreign Corporation) and Form 5471 (Information Return of U.S. Persons with Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations).

Section 301.7701-1(a)(1) provides, in part, that whether an organization is an entity separate from its owners for federal tax purposes is a matter of federal tax law and does not depend on whether the organization is recognized as an entity under local law.

Section 301.7701-1(a)(2) provides, in part, that a joint venture or other contractual arrangement may create a separate entity for federal tax purposes if the participants carry on a trade, business, financial operation, or venture and divide the profits therefrom.

Section 301.7701-2(a) provides in part, that a business entity is any entity recognized for federal tax purposes (including an entity with a single owner that may be disregarded as an entity separate from its owner under § 301.7701-3) that is not properly classified as a trust under § 301.7701-4 or otherwise subject to special treatment under the Internal Revenue Code.

Section 301.7701-5(a) provides in part, that a business entity (including an entity that is disregarded as separate from its owner under § 301.7701–2(c)) is domestic if it is created or organized as any type of entity (including, but not limited to, a corporation, unincorporated association, general partnership, limited partnership, and limited liability company) in the United States, or under the law of the United States or of any State. A business entity that is created or organized both in the United States and in a foreign jurisdiction is a domestic entity. A business entity (including an entity that is disregarded as separate from its owner under § 301.7701–2(c)) is foreign if it is not domestic. The determination of whether an entity is domestic or foreign is made independently from the determination of its corporate or non-corporate classification.

A joint venture or separate business entity may exist for federal tax purposes where business is not carried out in the name of the separate entity, property of the business is not held in the name of the separate entity, and one of the participants in the venture is not disclosed to third parties. Taxpayer and Affiliate plan to execute the Agreement in
PLR-140969-11
4

order to engage in an active business in Region, sharing in the profits and losses as well as the management of all activities in Region.

Accordingly, based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we find that:

  1. The Agreement between Taxpayer and Affiliate will create a separate business
    entity within the meaning of § 301.7701-2.

  2. All items of income and expense properly allocable to the business carried on by
    the separate business entity created by the Agreement will be treated as the
    income and expense of the separate business entity for federal income tax
    purposes.

  3. The separate business entity created by the Agreement will be a foreign
    business entity within the meaning of § 301.7701-5.

Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed above under any other provision of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder. Specifically, no opinion is expressed as to: (1) how § 367 of the Code and the regulations thereunder apply to the facts described in this ruling or (2) whether the separate business entity created by the Agreement is an eligible entity under
§ 301.7701-3.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

David R. Haglund
David R. Haglund
Branch Chief, Branch 1
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace