Chief Counsel Advice 1302035 Released January 11, 2013 Advice

A scanned signature can be treated as an original signature on Form 870-PT

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advice stated that a scanned signature should be treated as an original signature on Form 870-PT and that a court would likely admit the scanned copy as evidence. It relied on Federal Rules of Evidence Rules 1001(e) and 1003, while cautioning that IRS consents should not routinely be scanned and destroyed. The advice distinguished scanned IRS business documents from faxed taxpayer documents because faxed copies raise different authenticity and intent concerns.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a scanned copy of a signed Form 870-PT be treated as an original signature and admitted as evidence?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6061; Fed. R. Evid. 1001(e), 1003

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2012110211552441 Number: 201302035
Release Date: 1/11/2013
Office: ------------
UILC: 6061.00-00

From: -------------------
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:55:33 AM
To: --------------------
Cc: -----------------------------------------------
Subject: FW: 870 from CIS

The scanned signature should be treated as an original signature. We believe that a Court of law in this
situation would admit as evidence the scanned copy of the Form 870-PT. But we do not advise tthat
consents such as these be scanned and destroyed as a matter of course.

Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 1003, Admissibility of Duplicates: "A duplicate is admissible to
the same extent as the original unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or the
circumstances make it unfair to admit the duplicate." Under Rule 1001(e), a “duplicate” means a
counterpart produced by a mechanical, photographic, chemical, electronic, or other equivalent process or
technique that accurately reproduces the original.

The analysis of the legal sufficiency of a scanned copy of an original document is not entirely similar to
the analysis of a faxed document. First, we have a FAX policy which descirbes under what
circumstances and what dollar threshholds apply to the acceptances of these consents.
Second, faxed copies from taxpayers involve authenticy and intent concerns that do not exist when we
are dealing with the business practice of scanned IRS business documents.

I hope this has been helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.

-------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------


Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.