A scanned signature can be treated as an original signature on Form 870-PT
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advice stated that a scanned signature should be treated as an original signature on Form 870-PT and that a court would likely admit the scanned copy as evidence. It relied on Federal Rules of Evidence Rules 1001(e) and 1003, while cautioning that IRS consents should not routinely be scanned and destroyed. The advice distinguished scanned IRS business documents from faxed taxpayer documents because faxed copies raise different authenticity and intent concerns.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May a scanned copy of a signed Form 870-PT be treated as an original signature and admitted as evidence?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 6061; Fed. R. Evid. 1001(e), 1003
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2012110211552441 Number: 201302035
Release Date: 1/11/2013
Office: ------------
UILC: 6061.00-00
From: -------------------
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:55:33 AM
To: --------------------
Cc: -----------------------------------------------
Subject: FW: 870 from CIS
The scanned signature should be treated as an original signature. We believe that a Court of law in this situation would admit as evidence the scanned copy of the Form 870-PT. But we do not advise tthat consents such as these be scanned and destroyed as a matter of course.
Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 1003, Admissibility of Duplicates: "A duplicate is admissible to the same extent as the original unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or the circumstances make it unfair to admit the duplicate." Under Rule 1001(e), a “duplicate” means a counterpart produced by a mechanical, photographic, chemical, electronic, or other equivalent process or technique that accurately reproduces the original.
The analysis of the legal sufficiency of a scanned copy of an original document is not entirely similar to the analysis of a faxed document. First, we have a FAX policy which descirbes under what circumstances and what dollar threshholds apply to the acceptances of these consents. Second, faxed copies from taxpayers involve authenticy and intent concerns that do not exist when we are dealing with the business practice of scanned IRS business documents.
I hope this has been helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
-------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------
----------------------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace