A refund claim cannot be reconsidered after the suit period expires
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advice concluded that the IRS could not issue a refund after it had disallowed a claim as untimely and the period for filing a refund suit had expired. The advice relied on section 6514(a)(2), which treats such a refund as erroneous, and noted that later reconsideration by Appeals or Examination does not extend the suit period under section 6532(a)(4). The advice also noted that the taxpayer had not filed suit and had not obtained an extension of the two-year period.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can the IRS refund a disallowed claim after the statutory period for filing suit has expired?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 6511, 6514, and 6532
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2012101608115640 Number: 201302030
Release Date: 1/11/2013
Office: -------------
UILC: 6514.00-00
From: ----------------------
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 8:12:10 AM
To: --------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: Issue Coordination section 6511
Hi ---------
Thanks for sending the notice of disallowance. After looking at it and the other facts, we conclude that IRC 6514(a)(2) would prevent the Service from making any refund based on the ----------------------claim. Section 6514(a)(2) provides that a refund of any portion of an internal revenue tax shall be considered erroneous if it is made after the Service has disallowed the claim, and the period of limitation for filing suit has expired, unless within such period a suit was begun by the taxpayer. As you noted, the Service formally disallowed the taxpayer's ----------------------claim as untimely on ------------------. You have confirmed that the Service did not agree to extend the 2-year period under IRC 6532(a)(2). The taxpayer therefore had until ------------------under IRC 6532(a)(1) to file a refund suit, but they have not done so. While both Appeals and Exam now think the original claim was timely, this does not matter because any consideration, reconsideration, or action by the Secretary with respect to a claim following the mailing of a notice of disallowance by certified mail shall not operate to extend the period within which suit may be begun. IRC 6532(a)(4).
If you have any additional questions about this, please let me know.
Thanks,
------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace