PLR 1302011: IRS grants a retroactive qualified electing fund election

Plain-English summary

A family investment fund requested permission to make a retroactive qualified electing fund election for an investment in a foreign corporation treated as a passive foreign investment company. The fund said its accounting firm failed to identify the investment's PFIC status and did not advise it about the election before the deadline. The IRS concluded that the fund reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, that the PFIC issue had not been raised on audit, and that the regulatory requirements were satisfied. Consent was granted for the retroactive election for the specified year, subject to the procedural rules for making it.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: May the shareholder make a retroactive QEF election for its investment in a PFIC under Treas. Reg. § 1.1295-3(f)?
• Outcome: Approved. Consent was granted, subject to the applicable procedural rules.
• Key authorities: IRC § 1295; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1295-3(f) and 1.1295-3(g).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201302011 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/11/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 1295.02-02 ------------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------
--------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------- CC:INTL:B02
------------------- PLR-130837-12
----------------------------- Date:
October 10, 2012

               TY:-------

Legend

Shareholder = -------------------------
EIN = ----------------

General Partner = ----------------------------

Managing Member = -------------------------

Previous Managing Member = ---------------------------

FC = ------------------------------------------------

State = -------------
Country =--------

Date 1 = ----------------------
Date 2 = ------------------

Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Year 4 = -------

Accounting Firm = --------------------

Dear --------------------------

This is in response to a letter dated July 12, 2012 submitted by your authorized
representative that requested the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue

PLR-130837-12 2

Service (“Commissioner”) for Shareholder to make a retroactive qualified electing fund
("QEF") election under section 1295(b) of the Internal Revenue Code and Treas. Reg.
§1.1295-3(f) with respect to Shareholder’s investment in FC.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted on behalf of Shareholder by its authorized representative, and accompanied
by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office
has not verified any of the material submitted in support of this request for ruling, such
material is subject to verification on examination. The information submitted in the
request is substantially as set forth below.

FACTS

Shareholder is a limited partnership organized under the laws of State. Shareholder is
a family office investment fund whose objective is to achieve long-term capital growth
primarily through investing in publicly-traded equity securities of U.S.-domiciled and
listed operating companies, and, less frequently, in operating companies domiciled and
listed outside of the United States. Managing Member is the managing member of
General Partner, the general partner of Shareholder, and participates in managing the
fund’s investments. Managing Member became the managing member on Date 1,
when Previous Managing Member retired. From Shareholder’s inception until Date 1,
Previous Managing Member was the managing member of Shareholder.

During Year 1, Shareholder first invested in FC, an entity organized under the laws of
Country that was treated as a corporation for Federal tax purposes. Shareholder
acquired an additional interest in FC during Year 2. Subsequently, Shareholder
disposed of its entire interest in FC and no longer owns any interest in FC.

Since Year 3, Shareholder has employed Accounting Firm to provide tax advice and to
prepare its tax returns, as well as to perform Shareholder’s annual audit. Accounting
Firm is a national and renowned public accounting firm that has significant expertise in
both U.S. and international tax matters. As part of its audit and its annual tax-related
responsibilities, Accounting Firm performs an annual PFIC analysis for each foreign
investment Shareholder makes. Accounting Firm’s procedures for identifying potential
PFICs within Shareholder’s portfolio include screening for Shareholder’s foreign
investments in the list of foreign companies believed to be PFICs according to an
annual survey conducted by a third party, as well as in Accounting Firm’s internally
generated and maintained database of possible PFICs. For each foreign investment
that does not appear on the survey list or in Accounting Firm’s database, Accounting
Firm investigates the nature of the business to determine whether it may be a PFIC.
Accounting Firm has never solicited Shareholder’s direct help in identifying PFICs, and
thus has never instructed Shareholder on how to identify them. Additionally, Accounting
Firm has never discussed with Shareholder the tax consequences of owning a PFIC, or

PLR-130837-12 3

of the availability of making a QEF election prior to Year 4, when the issue with respect
to FC was discovered.

Shareholder provided Accounting Firm with a significant amount of information on FC,
including FC’s audited financials. Accounting Firm also had direct access to
communicate with the chief financial officer (“CFO”) of FC in connection with its tax and
financial accounting audit of Shareholder. Notwithstanding its knowledge of the FC
investment, its possession of FC’s financial reports and its access to FC’s CFO,
Accounting Firm failed to identify FC as a PFIC and therefore failed to advise
Shareholder of the availability of a QEF election with respect to Shareholder’s
investment in FC.

On Date 2, Managing Member received an email from FC’s investor relations
department concerning FC’s PFIC status. The email included as an attachment an
opinion letter from an accounting firm stating the accounting firm’s conclusion that FC
was a PFIC for the Year 2 taxable year. After receiving this email, Managing Member
discovered that the accounting firm also had concluded that FC was a PFIC for the Year
1 taxable year. Managing Member and Shareholder were not aware of the accounting
firm’s conclusion as to the PFIC status of FC for any year until Date 2.

Shareholder has submitted affidavits, under penalties of perjury, that describe the
events that led to its failure to make a QEF election with respect to FC by the election
due date, including the role of Accounting Firm. Shareholder also submitted an affidavit
from Accounting Firm, which describes Accounting Firm’s engagement and
responsibilities, and the advice concerning the tax treatment of FC that it provided to
Shareholder. In addition, Shareholder submitted the PFIC Annual Information
Statements (described in Treas. Reg. §1.1295-1(g)(1)) for FC for taxable years Year 1
through Year 2, which provide that FC did not have any earnings and profits for Year 1
through Year 2.

Shareholder represents that, as of the date of this request for ruling, the PFIC status of
FC has not been raised by the IRS on audit for any of the taxable years at issue.

RULING REQUESTED

Shareholder requests the consent of the Commissioner to make a retroactive QEF
election with respect to FC for Year 1 under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f).

LAW

PLR-130837-12 4

Section 1295(a) provides that a PFIC will be treated as a QEF with respect to a
shareholder if (1) an election by the shareholder under section 1295(b) applies to the
PFIC for the taxable year; and (2) the PFIC complies with the requirements prescribed
by the Secretary for purposes of determining the ordinary earnings and net capital gains
of the company.

Under section 1295(b)(2), a QEF election may be made for a taxable year at any time
on or before the due date (determined with regard to extensions) for filing the return for
the taxable year. To the extent provided in regulations, the election may be made after
the due date if the shareholder failed to make an election by the due date because the
shareholder reasonably believed the company was not a PFIC.

Under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f), a shareholder may request the consent of the
Commissioner to make a retroactive QEF election for a taxable year if:

   1. the shareholder reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, within the
      meaning of Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(2);
   2. granting consent will not prejudice the interests of the United States
      government, as provided in Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(3);
   3. the request is made before a representative of the Internal Revenue Service
      raises upon audit the PFIC status of the company for any taxable year of the
      shareholder; and
   4. the shareholder satisfies the procedural requirements of Treas. Reg. §1.1295-
      3(f)(4).

The procedural requirements include filing a request for consent to make a retroactive
election with, and submitting a user fee to, the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(International). Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(4)(i). Additionally, affidavits signed under
penalties of perjury must be submitted that describe:

   1. the events that led to the failure to make a QEF election by the election due
      date;
   2. the discovery of the failure;
   3. the engagement and responsibilities of the qualified tax professional; and
   4. the extent to which the shareholder relied on the professional.

Treas. Reg. §§1.1295-3(f)(4)(ii) and (iii).

CONCLUSION

Based on the information submitted and representations made with Shareholder’s ruling
request, we conclude that Shareholder has satisfied Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f).
Accordingly, consent is granted to Shareholder to make a retroactive QEF election with
respect to FC for Year 1, provided that Shareholder complies with the rules under
Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(g) regarding the time and manner for making the retroactive
QEF election.

PLR-130837-12 5

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This private letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section
6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter
ruling is being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter ruling must be attached to any federal income tax return to which it
is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control
number of the letter ruling.
.

                                   Sincerely,



                                   Jeffery G. Mitchell
                                   Branch Chief, Branch 2
                                   (International)

cc: