Determination Letter 1301019 Released January 4, 2013 Approved Transcribed from scan

IRS waives the 60-day rollover deadline after bank misinformation

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a taxpayer a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement after a bank representative incorrectly treated a new account as an IRA. The taxpayer transferred funds from an existing IRA into the account and later moved the money into another IRA after discovering the error. The IRS found that the failure to complete a timely rollover was caused by misinformation and waived the deadline, subject to the other requirements of IRC § 408(d)(3). The ruling did not address tax treatment under other Code or regulatory provisions.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer receive a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement for the distribution from the existing IRA?
  • Outcome: Approved, the IRS waived the 60-day requirement subject to the ruling's conditions.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

201301019

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
OCT 12 2012

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

[illegible]

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Legend:

Taxpayer A = XXXXXXXXXKXXXXX

IRA B = XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

IRA C = XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Bank D = XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Financial Institution E = XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Account F = XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXKXXXXX

Account G = XXXXXXXXXKXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Amount 1 = XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Amount 2 = XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Amount 3 = XXXXXXXXXXXXXKX

Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

This letter is in response to your request dated February 1, 2011, as supplemented by
correspondence dated March 10, 2012 and March 27, 2012, in which you request a
waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code (the “Code’).

201301019

XXXXXXXXXXXKXX
Page 2

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested:

Taxpayer A represents that he received a distribution from IRA B totaling Amount 1.
Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish a rollover of Amount 1 within the 60-
day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) was due to his reliance on misinformation
received from the representative of Bank D. Taxpayer A also represents that Amount 1
has not been used for any other purpose and remains in a non-IRA account.

Taxpayer A represents that he owned IRA B, which was maintained by Bank D. IRA B
was invested in Certificates of Deposits which matured on October 13,2C . On
October 18,20 , Taxpayer A met with a representative of Bank D for instructions on
how to complete a direct rollover to an IRA with Bank D that provided for a greater rate
of return. Based on the information received from the representative of Bank D,
Taxpayer A opened a new account, Account F, with Bank D on October 18, 20,
intending it to be an IRA. However, the information received from the representative of
Bank D was incorrect in that the account created, Account F, while providing for a
higher rate of return, was a non-IRA account. Taxpayer A transferred Amount 1 from
IRA B to Account F at that time intending it to be a direct rollover. On December 20,
20 _, still believing Account F was an IRA, Taxpayer A transferred Amount 2, a portion
of Amount 1, from Account F to an IRA he maintained at Financial Institution E, IRA C.
In January, 20 upon receipt of a Form 1099 from Account F, Taxpayer A became
aware that Account F was a non-IRA account. On January 26, 20 __, after consultations
with his CPA, Taxpayer A transferred Amount 3 (Amount 1 minus Amount 2) from
Account F to IRA C. Documentation submitted includes a letter from Bank D
acknowledging that there was a miscommunication regarding Taxpayer A’s intention
and desired disposition of IRA B after maturity in October, 20.

Based on the facts and representations, a ruling has been requested that the Internal
Revenue Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3)
of the Code with respect to the distribution of Amount 1. Amount 1 has not been used
and remains in IRA C.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section
408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income
by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section
72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not
apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if:

201301019

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Page 3

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into
an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on
which the individual receives the payment or distribution: or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into
an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not later
than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received, except
that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion
of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without regard
to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any
amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at
any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual
received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was
not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section 408(d)
do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure
to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining
whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section
408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including:
(1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to
death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country
or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of
payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the
distribution occurred.

The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent
with his assertion that his failure to accomplish timely rollover was due to his reliance on
the misinformation received from a representative of Bank D, which resulted in Amount
1 being deposited into Account F, a non-IRA account.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the
60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from IRA B.
Provided all other requirements of section 408(d)(3), except the 60-day requirement, are

201301019

XXXKXKXXXKXKXKXKXKXK
Page 4

met with respect to the contribution of Amount 2 on December 20,20 . and Amount 3
on January 26, 20 __, such contributions will be considered valid rollover contributions
within the meaning of section 408(d)(3) of the Code.

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of any amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be
applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact XXXXXXXXXXX (ID XXXXXXXX)
at (XXX) XXX-XXXX. Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T1.

Sincerely,

Carlton Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.