Private Letter Ruling 1250031 Released December 14, 2012 Denied Transcribed from scan

PLR 1250031: IRS declines to waive the 60-day IRA rollover requirement

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS declined to waive the 60-day rollover requirement for taxpayers who moved an IRA distribution into two non-IRA accounts before transferring the funds back to the IRA. The taxpayers said a financial institution's error caused the funds to be deposited incorrectly and that they intended to complete rollovers. The IRS concluded that the taxpayers had not shown circumstances warranting a waiver and had assumed the risk of self-directing the funds after taking the distribution. The ruling therefore treated the 60-day requirement as unwaived for the stated distribution.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the IRS waive the 60-day requirement for the IRA distribution?
  • Outcome: Denied
  • Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3)(I); Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 201250031

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

GOVERNMENT ENTITIES SEP 19 2012

DIVISION

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

T:EP:RA:T3

Legend:

Taxpayer A

Taxpayer B

IRA X

Amount A

Account B

Account C
Financial
Institution A =

Financial
Institution B

Financial
Institution C

Individual I
Dear

This is in response to your request dated December 12, 2011, supplemented by
correspondence dated April 23, 2012 and May 17, 2012, submitted on your behalf by

Page 2 201250031

your authorized representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover
requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of
perjury in support of the ruling requested.

Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B, married and filing a joint income tax return,
represent that Taxpayer A received a distribution from IRA X totaling Amount A.
Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B state that Taxpayer A's failure to accomplish a rollover
within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d) of the Code was due to an error
committed by Financial Institution A which led to the placement of Amount A into two
separate non-IRA accounts. Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B further assert that Amount A
has not been used for any other purpose.

Taxpayer A represents that prior to November 28, 20'_ , he discussed investing
the excess cash in IRA X with his financial advisor, Individual I of Financial Institution A.
Individual I informed Taxpayer A that Financial Institution A could not provide an
appropriate investment option that would yield a rate of return that was equal to or
better than the rates offered by Certificates of Deposit (CDs) at various banking
institutions. Individual I further advised Taxpayer A that Taxpayer A should transfer the
distribution to his checking account and then purchase the CDs directly from the
selected financial institutions. On November 28, 20: , Taxpayer A received a
distribution of Amount A in the form of a personal check from Financial Institution A, with
the intent to establish rollover IRAs at Financial Institution B and Financial Institution C.
That same day, Taxpayer A deposited half of Amount A into Account B at Financial
Institution B. On December 1,20 ., Taxpayer A deposited the other half of Amount A
into Account C with Financial Institution C. Both accounts were opened jointly in the
names of Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B. Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B did not discover
that Amount B and Amount C had been deposited into non-IRA accounts until after
receiving Form 1099-R from the Internal Revenue Service in February, 2009. On
February 12,20 ,andMarch4, 20 _ , Taxpayer A transferred the amounts in Account
B and Account C respectively back to IRA X.

An affidavit submitted by Individual I, financial advisor to Taxpayer A and
Taxpayer B indicates that Amount A was erroneously deposited into two non-IRA
accounts because Individual I failed to adequately advise Taxpayer A regarding the IRA
rollover accounts, and to ensure that the funds were actually deposited into rollover
IRAs as Taxpayer A had intended.

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal
Revenue Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3)
of the Code with respect to the distribution of Amount A.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in
section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross

201250031

Page 3

income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under
section 72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code
does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for
whose benefit the IRA is maintained if

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on
which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not
later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received,
except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the
portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without
regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not
apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from
an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such
individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA
which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section
408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for
partial rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section
408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-
day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the
failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to
section 408(d)(3)(I), the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) will consider all
relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial
institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization,
incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the

201250031

amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check
was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

Page 4

Taxpayer A has not presented any evidence to the Service as to how any of the
factors outlined in Rev. Proc. 2003-16 affected his ability to timely roll over Amount A
from IRA X to another IRA. Taxpayer A has stated that he wished to achieve the
highest rate of return in an appropriate investment vehicle and opted to pursue an
investment in certificates of deposit at another institution, despite the fact that the assets
in IRA X were under professional management at the time. Individual I had no duty to
ensure that the rollovers were completed correctly, once the funds were distributed to
Taxpayer A. In fact, when Taxpayer A took distribution of Amount A into his personal
checking account to self-direct his funds, even though he intended to rollover Amount A
into another IRA, he assumed the risk of doing so without benefit of professional advice.
Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby declines to
waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the November 28, 20,
distribution to Taxpayer A of Amount A.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which
may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter.is being sent to your authorized representative in accordance
with Form 2848 on file in this office.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact
at . Please address all correspondence to
SE:T:EP:RA:T3.

Sincerely,

Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager,
Employee Plans Technical Group 3

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.