PLR 201247020: IRS allows a beneficiary rollover after bank failures and the participant's death
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS waived the 60-day rollover requirement for a taxpayer who was the brother, executor, and beneficiary of a deceased retirement-plan participant. The taxpayer had arranged for a lump-sum plan benefit to be transferred to an IRA for the participant, but the accepting bank rejected attempted wire transfers and the participant died before the transfer could be completed. The IRS allowed the taxpayer to contribute an amount up to the plan benefit to a rollover IRA in the deceased participant's name for the taxpayer's benefit. The ruling also required the rollover IRA to be distributed under a five-year rule because it had no designated beneficiary, and it assumed that the taxpayer's actions complied with applicable state law.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the beneficiary receive a 60-day rollover waiver after bank processing failures and the participant's death prevented a planned direct rollover?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 402(a), 402(c), 401(a), 401(a)(9), 401(a)(31), 501, 72, and 6110; Rev. Proc. 2003-16; Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(31)-1
Full text (IRS public release)
201247020
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
AUG 30 2012
Uniform Issue List: 402.00-00
T:EP:RA:T2
Legend:
Decedent = ***
Taxpayer A = ***
Plan X = ***
IRA Y = ***
Date 1 = ***
Date 2 = ***
Date 3 = ***
Date 4 = ***
Date 5 = ***
Date 6 = ***
Date 7 = ***
Date 8 = ***
Date 9 = ***
Company V = ***
201247020
Page 2 of 5
Company F = ***
Amount 1 = ***
Amount 2 = ***
State N = “**
Dear “**
This is in response to your request dated September 10, 2010, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 402(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in support of the ruling requested.
Taxpayer A represents that he attempted a rollover from Plan X totaling Amount 1. Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by section 402(c)(3) of the Code was due to the accepting bank’s failure to timely process the attempts at transfer and the death of Decedent. Taxpayer A further represents that Amount 1 has not been used for any other purpose.
Decedent, who was born on Date 1 and died on Date 7 not having attained age 70 1/2, was a resident of State N. Decedent was not married at his death and was survived by his brother, Taxpayer A. As of his death, Decedent was a participant in Plan X, which is represented to be a retirement plan meeting the requirements of section 401(a) of the Code, under which Decedent had a lump sum benefit of Amount 1. On Date 2, Decedent appointed Taxpayer A as his power of attorney under the laws of State N, with the authority to make decisions on Decedent's behalf for, among other things, all employment issues, including, but not limited to benefits and elections, insurance, effectuating Decedent's retirement, electing pension options and any and all other retirement related matters. Taxpayer A is also the nominated executor of Decedent's estate and its sole distributee and sole beneficiary. On Date 3, as Decedent's authorized agent, Taxpayer A retired Decedent from Company V and signed a pension election authorization form that authorized Company V to pay out a lump sum from Plan X for Amount 1.
Further, while Decedent was still alive, Taxpayer A executed a direct debit authorization permitting Company V to transfer the lump sum payment from Plan X of Amount 1 to IRA Y, an IRA account for the Decedent established on Date 4, which designated Taxpayer A as the sole beneficiary. Taxpayer A represents that prior to Decedent's death, on Dates 5 and 6, attempts to complete wire transfers from Plan X to IRA Y for Amount 1 were disallowed by the accepting bank because the bank claimed the wire instructions were too long to process. On Date 8, after Decedent's death, Company V issued a check for Amount 1 to Company F, the custodian of IRA Y. However, since the Decedent had passed away, the check could not be deposited into IRA Y. Further, Company F closed out IRA Y after Decedent had passed away. On Date 9, Company V issued a new check made payable to the Decedent's estate for Amount 2 (Amount 1 less federal income tax withholding).
201247020
Page 3 of 5
Taxpayer A represents that it was clearly Decedent's intent to timely and directly contribute his lump sum benefit of Amount 1 from Plan X to the IRA Y, a newly created IRA established in Decedent's name to receive Amount 1, and that Decedent, through the actions of his authorized agent, Taxpayer A, took all appropriate and reasonable actions to achieve that result.
Based on the above facts and representations, you, through your authorized representative, request that Taxpayer A be permitted to deposit the portion of Decedent's account in Plan X authorized by Company V (not to exceed Amount 1) into an IRA (“Rollover IRA”) in the name of the Decedent (deceased) for the benefit of Taxpayer A within sixty (60) days of the date of notification to Taxpayer of the granting of this letter ruling.
With respect to your ruling requests, Section 402(a) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section 402, any amount actually paid or distributed from a trust described in section 401(a) which is tax exempt under section 501(a) shall be taxed to the distributee, in the taxable year of the distributee in which distributed, in the manner provided under section 72 (relating to annuities).
Section 402(c)(1) of the Code provides, generally, that if any portion of an eligible rollover distribution from a section 401(a) qualified retirement plan is transferred into an eligible retirement plan, the portion of the distribution so transferred shall not be includible in gross income in the taxable year in which paid.
Section 402(c)(3)(A) of the Code provides that except with respect to section 402(c)(3)(B), the exclusion from income under section 402(c)(1) shall not apply to any transfer of a distribution made after the 60th day following the day on which the distributee received the property distributed.
Section 402(c)(3)(B) provides that this 60-day requirement may be waived where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement.
Section 401(a)(31) provides the rules for governing “direct transfers of eligible rollover distributions.”
Section 1.401(a)(31)-1 of the Income Tax Regulations, Question and Answer 15, provides, in relevant part, that an eligible rollover distribution that is paid to an eligible retirement plan in a direct rollover is a distribution and rollover, and not a transfer of assets and liabilities.
Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 402(c)(3) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.
The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent with his assertion that his failure to accomplish a timely rollover was caused by both the failure
201247020
Page 4 of 5
of the accepting bank to process his attempts to wire transfer Amount 1 from Plan X to IRA Y, and the death of Decedent.
Therefore, pursuant to section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of an amount authorized by Company V (not to exceed Amount 1) from Plan X. Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter to contribute an amount authorized for distribution from Plan X by Company V not exceeding Amount 1 into a Rollover IRA. Provided all other requirements of section 402(c)(3) of the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such contribution, an amount authorized for distribution from Plan X by Company V not exceeding Amount 1 will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of section 402(c)(3) of the Code.
This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be distributed by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.
We note that the Rollover IRA into which an amount authorized by Company V be distributed from Plan X (not to exceed Amount 1) may be rolled over will not have a “designated beneficiary” as that term is defined in section 401(a)(9) of the Code. The section 401(a)(9) distribution period with respect to the Rollover IRA will be that applicable to an IRA owner who dies prior to attaining his required beginning date without having designated a beneficiary thereof. Accordingly, the entirety of Decedent's interest in Plan X that is rolled over into the Rollover IRA must be distributed to Taxpayer A no later than the end of the calendar year containing the fifth anniversary of Decedent's death.
Finally, the scope of Taxpayer A’s authority both under the executed power of attorney while Decedent was alive and as an executor of Decedent’s estate after Decedent’s death are matters governed by state law. This ruling assumes Taxpayer A’s actions relevant to the ruling request contained herein are in accordance with the laws of State N and taken pursuant to Taxpayer A’s authority as Decedent’s power of attorney while Decedent was alive and as executor of Decedent’s estate after Decedent's death.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be applicable thereto.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
201247020
Page 5 of 5
If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact **** at
__** (phone-not a toll-free number) or (FAX).
Sincerely yours,
[illegible signature]
Donzell H. Littlejohn, Manager,
Employee Plans Technical Group 2
Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose
Cc: ***
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace