U.S. citizens remain subject to U.S. tax despite an Israel treaty tie-breaker

Number
201247013
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Israel; Coordination with Income Tax Treaties
Code sections
§ 7701
Ruling dated
August 10, 2012
Publicly released
November 23, 2012

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen with a permanent home in Israel may be treated as an Israeli resident for treaty purposes under the U.S.-Israel treaty tie-breaker rule. The treaty's saving clause generally preserves the United States' right to tax its citizens as though the treaty were not in effect. The regulations allowing certain treaty-resident alien individuals to be treated as nonresident aliens do not apply to U.S. citizens, who generally must file Form 1040 and remain subject to U.S. tax on worldwide income, subject to treaty exceptions.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does treaty residence in Israel make a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen a nonresident alien for U.S. tax purposes?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: U.S.-Israel income tax treaty, Articles 3(2)(a), 6(3), and 6(4); Treas. Reg. § 301.7701(b)-7

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2012081010091619 Number: 201247013
Release Date: 11/23/2012
Office: ------------------
UILC: 9114.03-44, 7701.21-20

From: ---------------------
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 10:10:17 AM
To: -----------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: ------ United States- Israeli Tax Treaty Article 3, Section 2(a)

This is in response to your inquiry concerning the application of Article 3(2) (the so-called "tie-breaker rule") of the U.S.-Israel income tax treaty to an individual who is a citizen of both the United States and Israel. We agree that a U.S. citizen who has a permanent home in Israel may be deemed to be a resident of Israel solely for purposes of the treaty under Article 3(2)(a). Under the "saving clause" in Article 6(3), however, we generally retain the right (subject to limited exceptions in Article 6(4)) to tax our citizens as if the treaty had not come into effect.

It has been suggested that a U.S. citizen who is treated as a resident of Israel under the tie-breaker rule of the treaty may be treated as a nonresident alien (NRA) for purposes of computing his U.S. income tax liability. This rule is found in section 301.7701(b)-7 of the regulations, which applies only to alien individuals and not to U.S. citizens. The first sentence of the section of the regulations provides that "[t]he application of this section shall be limited to an alien individual who is a dual resident taxpayer pursuant to a provision of a treaty that provides for resolution of conflicting claims of residence by the United States and its treaty partner" (emphasis added).

A U.S. citizen who is treated as a resident of another country under an income tax treaty would still be required to file a Form 1040 (assuming his income meets the filing thresholds) and would still be subject to U.S. tax on his worldwide income (except to the extent one of the exceptions to the saving clause applies).

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace