Private Letter Ruling 1245014 Released November 9, 2012 Approved

PLR 1245014: IRS restores S corporation status after an inadvertent termination

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled that a corporation's S corporation election was inadvertently terminated when its trust shareholders stopped qualifying as qualified subchapter S trusts. The corporation represented that the termination was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning and that the trustees took steps to correct the shareholder problem. The IRS treated the corporation as continuing to be an S corporation from the termination date, and treated the trusts as qualified subchapter S trusts during the period they held the corporation's stock. The ruling requires the corporation and its shareholders to report the corporation consistently with S corporation status and make required tax adjustments.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation's S corporation status continue after its election was inadvertently terminated because its trust shareholders failed to qualify as QSSTs?
  • Outcome: Approved, the termination was treated as inadvertent and S corporation status was restored
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361, 1362(f), 1366, 1367, and 1368

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201245014 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/9/2012 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
----------------- ----------------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------------- ---------------------
------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-115843-12
Date: June 28, 2012

X = ------------------------------------------

Trusts = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------

                                 ------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D1 = ------------------------

D2 = ----------------------------

PLR-115843-12 2

Dear ---------------:

   This responds to a letter dated March 2, 2012, submitted on behalf of X by its

authorized representative requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue
Code.

   X made an election to be treated as an S corporation. X’s election was

inadvertently terminated effective D1, when the Trusts ceased to qualify as eligible
shareholders for each failing to satisfy the requirements of a qualified subchapter S trust
(“QSST”). Prior to D2, the trustees of the Trusts took steps to ensure that the trusts
again satisfied the requirements for being QSSTs. X represents that the termination
was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders
have agreed to make any adjustments that the Commissioner may require, consistent
with the treatment of X as an S corporation.

    Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any

corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined
without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of
§ 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2)
or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the
ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of
time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination,
steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to
acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a
shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to
§ 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the
corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to
such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or
termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period
specified by the Secretary.

    Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude

that the termination of X’s S corporation election on D1 was inadvertent within the
meaning of § 1362(f). We further hold that, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X
will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from D1 and thereafter, provided X’s
S corporation election was valid and provided that the election was not otherwise
terminated under § 1361(d). Moreover, each of the Trusts will be treated as a QSST
during the period for which it held X stock.

  This ruling is conditioned upon X and all its shareholders treating X as having

been an S corporation for the termination period and thereafter. Moreover, the

PLR-115843-12 3

shareholders of X must include their pro rata share of the separately stated and
nonseparately computed items of income, loss, deduction, or credit as provided in
§ 1366, make any adjustments to basis as provided in § 1367, and take into account
any distributions made by X as provided in § 1368. If X or its shareholders fail to treat
themselves as described above, this ruling is null and void.

    Except as specifically ruled above, we express no opinion concerning the federal

tax consequences of the transactions described above under any other provisions of the
Code. This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Pursuant to a power of attorney
on file, we are sending a copy of this letter to X’s authorized representative.

                                  Sincerely,

                                  /s/

                                  Richard T. Probst
                                  Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
                                  Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                  (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.