CCA 201243014: Chief Counsel advises on consolidated net operating loss carrybacks
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel reviewed advice about an unclaimed consolidated net operating loss carryback and agreed that the identified consolidated net operating loss should not be included in calculating available taxable income for the specified years before applying another loss. The advice also identified two issues that could affect the result. The taxpayer could seek an extension of time to make an IRC § 172(b)(3) election to waive the carryback period, and the amount available for carryback could depend on whether a contributing group member had a separate return year under the consolidated-return regulations. The memorandum expressed no opinion on whether the taxpayer would qualify for § 9100 relief.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: How should an unclaimed consolidated net operating loss carryback be treated, and what other consolidated-return issues could affect the analysis?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 172(b)(3), 1502, 6511, and 6110; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1502-1, 1.1502-21, and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2012082215435363 Number: 201243014
Release Date: 10/26/2012
Office: ------------
UILC: 172.00-00, 6511.00-00, 1502.00- 00
From: -----------------
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 3:43:55 PM
To: ------------------------------
Cc: ------------------------------------------------------------------ Subject: Response to Request for Legal Advice on NOL issue, ----------------------
We are responding to your request for review of legal advice regarding unclaimed consolidated net operating loss carryback (CNOL) and § 301.6511(d)-2(a)(3) of Income Tax Regulations. We concur with your draft response and the treatment of § 301.6511(d)-2(a)(3) and Revenue Ruling 81-88. We agree that the ------ CNOL should not be taken into account in calculating the available taxable income for ------ and ------ prior to applying the ------ CNOL.
However, we would like to point out that there are two provisions in the consolidated return regulations under § 1502 that may impact your response. First, the taxpayer could request an extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 to file a § 172(b)(3) election to waive the carryback period for its ------ CNOL. Section 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) provides that a group may make an irrevocable election under § 172(b)(3) to relinquish the entire carryback period with respect to a CNOL for any consolidated return year. We express no opinion as to whether the taxpayer satisfies the standards under the regulations to receive § 9100 relief to make the election.
Second, the amount of the group's ------ CNOL that may be carried to the group's ------ and ------- taxable years depends on whether any member of the group that contributed to the ------ CNOL has a separate return year as defined in § 1.1502-1(e). Section 1.1502-21(b)(2)(i) provides that if any CNOL that is attributable to a member may be carried to a separate return year of the member, that amount of the CNOL that is attributable to the member is apportioned to the member and carried to the separate return year. Section 1.1502-1(e) defines a separate return year as a taxable year of a corporation for which it files a separate return or for which it joins in the filing of a consolidated return by another group. Accordingly, if any member of the group that contributed to the ------ CNOL has a separate return year, that will affect the amount of the
------ CNOL that may be carried to the group's ------ and ------ taxable years.
Should you have any questions regarding §172, please let me know. If you have any questions regarding § 301.6511(d)-2(a)(3) or Revenue Ruling 81-88, please contact ----------------------------
------------. If you have any questions regarding § 1502, please contact -------------------------------
-----------------. Thank you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace