Private Letter Ruling 1241016 Released October 12, 2012 Approved Transcribed from scan

IRS waives the 60-day rollover deadline after a financial institution miscalculated an RMD

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS waived the 60-day rollover deadline for an excess IRA distribution caused by a financial institution's failure to record the taxpayer's spouse's age. That error caused the institution to calculate the taxpayer's required minimum distribution using the wrong table, resulting in an excess distribution that the taxpayer did not use. The IRS granted 60 days from the ruling date to contribute the excess amount to a rollover IRA, provided the other rollover requirements were met. The ruling did not authorize rolling over amounts that were otherwise required to be distributed under IRC § 401(a)(9).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer receive a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement for an excess RMD caused by a financial institution's error?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(9), 408(d)(3), 408(d)(3)(I), and 6110; Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

201241016

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

SEP 06 2012

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

Legend:

Taxpayer A =
Spouse B =
IRA X =
Financial Institution N =
Amount A =
Amount B =
Amount C =
Individual I =

Dear

This is in response to your request dated December 12, 2011, supplemented by
additional correspondence dated July 3, 2012, and July 11, 2012, and submitted on
your behalf by your authorized representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-
day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code
(the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalties of
perjury in support of the ruling requested.

201241016

Page 2

Taxpayer A represents that he received a distribution from IRA X totaling Amount
A. Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period
prescribed by section 408(d)(3) was due to the error committed by Financial Institution
N.

On October 20, 2008, Taxpayer A, age 87, opened IRA X at Financial Institution
N. Taxpayer A named Spouse B, age 61, as the primary beneficiary of IRA X.
Financial Institution N failed to record that Spouse B was more than 10 years younger
than Taxpayer A. On September 9, 2010, Taxpayer A was notified that his 2010
Required Minimum Distribution (“RMD”) was Amount A, and directed that Amount A be
deposited into his personal checking account.

On April 11, 2011, Taxpayer A was notified by Individual I, the Vice President of
Financial Institution N, that his 2010 RMD had been calculated incorrectly using the
Uniform Lifetime Table, rather than the Joint and Last Survivor Table. This error
occurred as a result of Financial Institution N’s failure to record Spouse B’s age.
Taxpayer A’s correct 2010 RMD was Amount B, resulting in an excess distribution of
Amount C. When Taxpayer A requested that Amount C be returned to IRA X, he was
informed that the error was discovered after the 60-day rollover period had expired.

Taxpayer A has not used Amount C for any other purpose. Individual I has
submitted an affidavit dated July 10, 2012, assuming responsibility for the error that
resulted in the incorrect calculation of the 2010 RMD.

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal
Revenue Service (the “Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in
section 408(d)(3) of the Code with respect to the excess distribution of Amount C.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in
section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross
income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under
section 72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code
does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for
whose benefit the IRA is maintained if:

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on
which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not

201241016

Page 3

later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received,
except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the
portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without
regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply
to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA
if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual
received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was
not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for
partial rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section
408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-
day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the
failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-41 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to
section 408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances,
including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a
rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a
foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the
case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed
since the distribution occurred.

The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is
consistent with his assertion that he received an excess distribution of Amount C from
IRA X, because of an error committed by Financial Institution N in incorrectly calculating
Taxpayer's 2010 RMD using the Uniform Lifetime Table instead of the Joint and Last
Survivor Table.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby
waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the excess distribution of
Amount C from IRA X. Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of
this ruling letter to contribute Amount C to a rollover IRA account. Provided all other
requirements of section 408(d)(3) of the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met
with respect to such contributions, Amount C will be considered a rollover contribution
within the meaning of section 408(d)(3) of the Code.

201241016

Page 4

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of any amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which
may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative in accordance
with Form 2848 on file in this office.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact

at . Please address all correspondence to
SE:T:EP:RA:T3.

Sincerely,
Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager,
Employee Plans Technical Group 3

Enclosures:

Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

CC:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.