CCA recommends a mootness motion when a CDP tax is fully paid

Number
201240020
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Collection Due Process - Levy
Code sections
§ 6330
Publicly released
October 5, 2012

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice addressed documents and proposed language in a collection due process case. It stated that when the tax has been fully paid, the IRS's general position is to file a motion to dismiss for mootness instead of a decision document. A decision document may be appropriate when non-CDP taxes or refunds also need to be resolved through a stipulation. For assessed taxes in a CDP case, the advice generally favored stating that the assessment will be abated, and that a notice of federal tax lien will be released if one was filed.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What filing and disposition language should be used in a collection due process case when the tax is fully paid or abated?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6330

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2012071908242355 Number: 201240020
Release Date: 10/5/2012
Office: ----------------------------
UILC: 6330.00-00

From: ---------------------
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 8:24:25 AM
To: ---------------------
Cc: -----------------
Subject: RE: CDP decision documents

Our general position is that a motion to dismiss for mootness, rather than a decision document, should be filed when the tax is fully paid. Perhaps a decision document would be appropriate if there are issues involving non-CDP taxes or refunds that we want to resolve in a below the line stipulation. In that scenario, your proposed language would not work.

As far as your last question, since in CDP we are dealing with actual assessed taxes, we have usually thought it was appropriate to state that the assessment will be abated (and if a NFTL is filed, that the NFTL will be released). Of course, in some cases the tax has already been abated by the time we draft the decision document, or we are only dealing with unassessed interest accruals. I have found it impossible to come up with sample decision documents that cover every possible scenario in a CDP case.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace