Private Letter Ruling 1240002 Released October 5, 2012 Approved

PLR 1240002: IRS grants extra time to elect the alternative depreciation system

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A limited partnership that operated an affordable housing community used the general depreciation system for property placed in service during two tax years, even though its partnership agreement required an election to use the alternative depreciation system. The IRS found that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith after relying on qualified tax preparers. It granted 60 days to make the section 168(g)(7) election for both years by filing amended returns and required amended returns for affected later years. The ruling did not decide whether any property was independently required to use the alternative depreciation system under section 168(g)(1)(A) through (D).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a partnership make a late election to use the alternative depreciation system for property placed in service in prior tax years?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 167 and 168; Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 and 301.9100-7T

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201240002 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/5/2012 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 9100.00-00 ---------------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------
----------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------------------------------------------------------- CC:ITA:B07
--------- PLR-100955-12
------------------------------------------------ Date:
-------------------------------------- June 21, 2012


Re: Request for Extension of Time to Make Elections to Use the Alternative
Depreciation System

Taxpayer = ------------------------------------------------------------------------


General Partner = ------------------------------------------------------------------------


Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = --------------------------
Date 3 = --------------------------
A = ------------------------------------------------------------------------


B = -------------------------

Dear ---------------:

   This letter responds to a letter dated January 3, 2012, submitted on behalf of

Taxpayer by its General Partner requesting an extension of time pursuant to §
301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an election under
§ 168(g)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code to use the alternative depreciation system
(ADS) for all tangible depreciable property placed in service by Taxpayer in the taxable
years ended Date 2 and Date 3.

FACTS

       General Partner represents that the facts are as follows:

PLR-100955-12 2

Taxpayer is a limited partnership that owns and operates an affordable housing

community. Taxpayer uses a calendar year-end and the accrual method of accounting.

    General Partner relied on qualified tax professionals to prepare Taxpayer’s

Federal income tax return for the taxable years ended Date 1, Date 2, and Date 3. On
its timely filed return for the taxable year ended Date 1, General Partner made the
election under § 168(g)(7) to use the ADS for all tangible depreciable property placed in
service by Taxpayer. On its timely filed return for the taxable years ended Date 2 and
Date 3, General Partner did not make the election under § 168(g)(7) to use the ADS for
all tangible depreciable property placed in service by Taxpayer in those two years.
Accordingly, Taxpayer determined its depreciation deduction for the taxable years
ended Date 2 and Date 3 by using the general depreciation system (GDS) under §
168(a) instead of the ADS. Under its partnership agreement, Taxpayer is obligated to
make the election prescribed under § 168(g)(7), unless special consent is received by
one of its limited partners. For the taxable years ended Date 2 and Date 3, no consent
was requested or received from its limited partner.

    For Taxpayer’s Federal income tax return for the taxable year ended Date 2, A, a

qualified tax preparer, prepared and reviewed Taxpayer’s return. For the taxable year
ended Date 3, B, a new qualified preparer, raised questions regarding the depreciation
changes and requirements under the partnership agreement. The issue was not
resolved prior to the contractual due date to file the Taxpayer’s Form 1065, and issue
the associated Schedule K-1 to its limited partners for the taxable year ended Date 3.
Thus, B relied on A’s prior year determination that Taxpayer’s should depreciate its
assets under GDS and not the required ADS when B prepared the Date 3 return.

RULING REQUESTED

   Taxpayer requests an extension of time pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the

Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the election under § 168(g)(7) to
use the ADS for all tangible depreciable property placed in service by Taxpayer in the
taxable years ended Date 2 and Date 3.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

   Section 167(a) provides that there shall be allowed as a depreciation deduction a

reasonable allowance for the exhaustion, wear and tear, and obsolescence of property
used in the taxpayer’s trade or business.

   The depreciation deduction provided by § 167(a) for tangible property placed in

service after 1986 generally is determined under § 168. Section 168 prescribes two
methods of accounting for determining depreciation allowances. One method is the
general depreciation system in § 168(a), and the other method is the alternative
depreciation system in § 168(g). Under either depreciation system, the depreciation
PLR-100955-12 3

deduction is computed by using a prescribed depreciation method, recovery period, and
convention.

   Section 168(g)(7) permits a taxpayer to elect for any class of property for any

taxable year to use the ADS for determining depreciation for all property in that class
placed in service during that taxable year. However, in the case of nonresidential real
property, the election is made separately with respect to each property. An election to
use ADS is irrevocable.

    Section 301.9100-7(T)(a)(1) provides that the election under § 168(g)(7) must be

made for the taxable year in which the property is placed in service. Section 301.9100-
7T(a)(2)(i) further provides that this election must be made by the due date (including
extensions) of the tax return for the taxable year for which the election is to be effective.
Section 301.9100-7T(a)(3)(i) provides that the election under § 168(g)(7) is made by
attaching a statement to the tax return for the taxable year for which the election is to be
effective.

   Under § 301.9100-1, the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable

extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

    Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be

granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

CONCLUSIONS

   Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the

requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly,
Taxpayer is granted 60 calendar days from the date of this letter to make the election
under § 168(g)(7) to use the ADS for determining depreciation for all tangible
depreciable property placed in service by Taxpayer during the taxable years ended
Date 2 and Date 3. These elections must be made by General Partner filing an
amended Federal income tax return for the taxable years ended Date 2 and Date 3, with
a statement indicating that Taxpayer is electing to use the ADS for all tangible
depreciable property placed in service by Taxpayer during the taxable years ended
Date 2 and Date 3. General Partner also must file amended Federal income tax returns
PLR-100955-12 4

for any affected succeeding taxable years. In addition, the copy of this letter must be
attached to such amended return. A copy is enclosed for that purpose.

   Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the

federal income tax consequences of the facts described above under any other
provisions of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied on whether any
item of depreciable property placed in service by Taxpayer in the taxable years ended
Date 2 and Date 3 are required to use the ADS pursuant to § 168(g)(1)(A) through (D).

  In accordance with the power of attorney, we are sending copies of this letter to

Taxpayer’s authorized representatives. We are also sending a copy of this letter to the
appropriate operating division director.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

                                             Sincerely,

                                             PATRICK CLINTON


                                             PATRICK CLINTON
                                             Assistant to Branch Chief, Branch 7
                                             Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                             (Income Tax and Accounting)

Enclosure (1):
copy for section 6110 purposes
copy of this letter

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.