PLR 1239012: IRS grants a nonprofit more time to revoke its lobbying election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An exempt public charity asked for more time to retroactively revoke its IRC § 501(h) lobbying election after becoming the sole member of an affiliated group. The organization said it had relied on qualified legal and accounting professionals who did not identify the need to revoke the election, and it asked for relief before the IRS discovered the issue. The IRS granted the request because the organization acted reasonably and in good faith, and retroactive revocation would not prejudice the government or lower the aggregate tax liability for the affected years. The organization received 30 days from the ruling date to file the revocation, effective for all tax years beginning after the specified redacted date.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May an exempt public charity receive extra time to retroactively revoke its IRC § 501(h) lobbying election?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(h), 4911(f), 6501(a), and 6662; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(h)-2 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
Release Date: 201239012 Contact Person:
Release Date: 9/28/2012
Date: July 3, 2012 Identification Number:
Uniform Issue List:
501.38-02 Telephone Number:
9100.00-00
Employer Identification Number:
Legend
Date 1 =
Date 2 =
Date 3 =
Date 4 =
Date 5 =
Year 1 =
Year 2 =
University =
Dear
This is in response to your ruling request dated Date1 as amended on Date 2, seeking
discretionary relief under § 301.9100-3 of the Miscellaneous Regulations (“miscellaneous
regulations”) for an extension of time to revoke your election under § 501(h) of the Internal
Revenue Code (“Code”), effective for all tax years beginning after Date 3.
FACTS
You are exempt from federal income tax as an organization described in § 501(c)(3) of the Code
and classified as a public charity under §§ 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(ii). You made a § 501(h)
lobbying expenditure test election (the "lobbying election") on Date 4 and have not revoked the
lobbying election.
Several years ago, you entered into discussions with University, which is also exempt from
federal income tax as an organization described in § 501(c)(3) of the Code and classified as a
public charity under §§ 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(ii). These discussions resulted in an
agreement by which you became the sole member of University. Throughout the process, the
parties conducted due diligence on each other's operations and held negotiations focused
primarily on the terms of the agreement and how best to integrate your programs with those of
University while allowing you to continue as a separate entity. You have represented that as a
result of the agreement, you became a member of an affiliated group with University within the
meaning of § 4911(f)(2).
During the course of the negotiations and due diligence by you and the University, the impact of
your lobbying election did not come to the attention of either you or the University. You had
relied on a qualified attorney for legal advice on all aspects of the acquisition, including the
impact of the agreement on your tax-exempt status. Your attorney did not inform you that you
would be subject to the affiliation rules of § 4911(f) of the Code as a result of this transaction nor
did he advise you to revoke your lobbying election to avoid the adverse consequences of §
4911(f)(2).
The accounting firm that prepared your Year 1 Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt from
Income Tax, did not identify the unintended consequences of your failure to timely revoke your §
501(h) of the Code lobbying election. However, during the preparation of your Year 2 Form 990
in April 2011, your accounting firm discovered the unintended consequences of your failure to
timely revoke your § 501(h) lobbying election. Under § 4911(f)(2), you became the sole electing
member of the affiliated group, potentially liable for the excise tax on the affiliated group’s
excess lobbying expenditure.
You immediately conducted an internal review of this matter and retained an accounting firm
and outside legal counsel to assist in preparing a request for discretionary relief under §
301.9100 of the miscellaneous regulations. In addition, you filed a Form 5768 revoking your §
501(h) lobbying election for the tax years beginning after Date 5. You then filed this request
before the Internal Revenue Service (the "Service") initiated any examination or discovered this
matter.
Granting your request will eliminate a tax liability that arose as a result of your inadvertent failure
to revoke your lobbying election. It will not result in a lower tax liability than was applicable at the
time you should have revoked your lobbying election.
RULING REQUESTED
You requested the following ruling:
That you be granted an extension of time to retroactively revoke your § 501(h) lobbying election
effective for all tax years beginning after Date 3.
LAW
Section 501(c)(3) of the Code exempts from federal income tax entities organized and operated
exclusively for charitable, educational and other exempt purposes, provided, in relevant part,
that no substantial part of the organization's activities may consist of carrying on propaganda, or
otherwise attempting to influence legislation except as otherwise provided in subsection (h).
Section 501(h) of the Code sets out an alternative to the "no substantial part" limitation on
expenditures made for the purposes of influencing legislation. This section permits an
organization to elect to be governed by mechanical rules that set ceilings on the permissible
lobbying expenditures it may make during a taxable year.
Section 501(h)(3) of the Code provides that this subsection shall apply to any organization
which has elected (in such manner and at such time as the Secretary may prescribe) to have
the provisions of this subsection apply to such organization and which, for the taxable year
which includes the date the election is made, is described in subsection (c)(3) and
(A) is described in paragraph (4), and
(B) is not a disqualified organization under paragraph (5).
Section 501(h)(4) of the Code provides that organizations permitted to elect to have this
subsection apply include an organization that is described in § 170(b)(1)(A)(ii) (relating to
educational institutions).
Section 501(h)(6)(A) of the Code provides that an organization's election under § 501(h) is
effective for all taxable years which end after the date the election is made.
Section 501(h)(6)(B) of the Code provides that an organization's election under § 501(h)
continues to be effective for all taxable years which begin before the date the election is revoked
by the organization under regulations prescribed by the Secretary.
Section 1.501(h)-2(a) of the Income Tax Regulations (“regulations”) provides that an election
under § 501(h) is made by filing a completed Form 5768, Election/Revocation of Election by an
Eligible § 501(c)(3) Organization to make Expenditures to Influence Legislation. This section
also provides that the election remains in effect for each succeeding taxable year for which the
organization is an eligible organization and which begins before a notice of revocation is filed
under paragraph (d) of § 1.501(h)-2 of the regulations.
Section 1.501(h)-2(d)(1) of the regulations provides that an organization may voluntarily revoke
a lobbying election by filing a Form 5768. Under section 501(h)(6)(B), a voluntary revocation is
effective with the beginning of the first taxable year after the taxable year in which the notice is
filed. If an organization voluntarily revokes its election, the substantial part test of section
501(c)(3) will apply with respect to the organization's activities in attempting to influence
legislation beginning with the taxable year for which the voluntary revocation is effective.
Section 4911(f)(1)(A) of the Code provides that when two or more organizations are affiliated,
and at least one has made an election under § 501(h), the determination as to whether excess
lobbying expenditures have been made and the expenditure limits of § 501(h)(1) have been
exceeded, shall be made as though the affiliated organizations are one organization.
Section 4911(f)(2) of the Code defines membership in an affiliated group, for the purposes of
the preceding paragraph: when the governing instrument of one organization requires it to be
bound by the decisions of another on legislative issues, or the governing board of one
organization includes persons who are either specifically designated representatives or
members of the governing board, officers, or paid executive staff of another organization; and
who by aggregating their votes have sufficient power to cause or prevent action on legislative
issues by the first organization.
Section 301.9100-1(a) of the miscellaneous regulations provides that the regulations under this
section and §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to
determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election.
Section 301.9100-1(b) of the miscellaneous regulations defines a regulatory election as an
election the due date of which is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register,
revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin.
Section 301.9100-1(c) of the miscellaneous regulations gives the Commissioner discretion to
grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, but no more than six months to make a
regulatory or statutory election.
Section 301.9100-3(a) of the miscellaneous regulations provides that requests for extensions of
time to file regulatory elections will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to
establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in
good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) of the miscellaneous regulations provides that a taxpayer will be
deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer:
i. Requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered by the
Service;
ii. Failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer's control;
iii. Failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence, the taxpayer
was unaware of the necessity for the election;
iv. Reasonably relied on the written advice of the Service; or
v. Reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make, or advise the
taxpayer to make, the election.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(3) of the miscellaneous regulations provides that a taxpayer will not be
considered to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer:
i. Seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy related penalty could be imposed
under § 6662 of the Code at the time the taxpayer requests relief and the new position
requires a regulatory election for which relief is requested;
ii. Was informed in all material respects of the required election but chooses not to make
the election; or
iii. Uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since the original
deadline that makes the election advantageous to a taxpayer, the Service will not
ordinarily grant relief.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) of the miscellaneous regulations states that the Service will grant a
reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election only when the interests of the
Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief. The interests of the Government are
prejudiced when:
i. Granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for
all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the election
had been timely made. Similarly, if the tax consequences of more than one taxpayer are
affected by the election, the Government's interests are prejudiced if there is a resulting
decrease in the aggregate tax liability for all affected taxpayers.
ii. If the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made, or any
taxable years that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made, are
closed by the period of limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) of the Code before
the taxpayer's receipt of a ruling granting relief under this section, the Government's
interests are ordinarily prejudiced.
Section 6501(a) of the Code provides that, in general, the amount of any tax imposed must be
assessed within three years after the return was filed.
Section 6662 of the Code imposes an accuracy related penalty for any underpayment of tax
required to be shown on a return, if that underpayment is attributable to one of several different
actions.
Rev. Rul. 83-74, 1983-1 C.B. 112, granted relief under § 301.9100-1 of the procedure
regulations to a homeowner's association seeking to revoke its § 528 election. The Service
reasoned that the situation of a taxpayer seeking relief to revoke an election is analogous to one
where a taxpayer is seeking relief to make an election, and thus the provisions of § 301.9100-1
of the miscellaneous regulations are applicable.
ANALYSIS
A taxpayer may seek relief under § 301.9100-3 of the regulations for an extension of time to file
a regulatory election. An election whose due date is published in the Federal Register is
considered a regulatory election under § 301.9100-1(b). The due dates for making and
revoking lobbying elections under § 501(h) of the Code are published in the Federal Register,
pursuant to a grant of authority under § 501(h)(3). Therefore, the § 501(h) lobbying election is a
regulatory election within the meaning of § 301.9100-1(b).
A taxpayer seeking relief to revoke an election is in a position analogous to one seeking relief to
make an election, and thus the provisions of § 301.9100-3 of the miscellaneous regulations are
applicable. Rev Rul. 83-74, supra. Because you are seeking relief to revoke an election, Rev.
Rul. 83-74 allows you to seek relief under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.
Relief may be granted if the taxpayer establishes to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that he
acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the relief will not prejudice the interests of the
Government. § 301.9100-3(a) of the miscellaneous regulations. A taxpayer may demonstrate that
he has acted reasonably and in good faith by requesting relief before the Service discovers his
failure to make the regulatory election, among other methods. § 301.9100-3(b) of the
miscellaneous regulations. You made this request before the Service discovered your failure to
revoke the election. Therefore, you will be deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith,
provided that none of the circumstances in § 301.9100-3(b)(3) apply.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(3) of the miscellaneous regulations sets out three circumstances which
show that a taxpayer has not acted reasonably or in good faith, but none apply to you. In this
case, you are not seeking to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has
been or could be imposed under § 6662 of the Code at the time relief is requested. In addition,
you were not informed in all material respects of the required election and chose not to make
the election. Further, you are not using hindsight in requesting relief because no facts have
changed since the due date of the revocation that would make the revocation more
advantageous. Therefore, you are deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith within
the meaning of § 301.9100-3(b)(3).
In addition, for relief to be granted, a taxpayer must also establish that an extension of time
would not prejudice the interests of the Government. § 301.9100-3(a) of the miscellaneous
regulations. The interests of the Government would be prejudiced if granting relief would result
in the taxpayer having a lower tax liability than the taxpayer would have had if the election had
been timely made. § 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i). If you make a retroactive revocation of your lobbying
election, your tax liability, and that of your affiliates, will be the same as it would have been if
you had made the revocation during your tax Year 1, before the agreement took effect.
Allowing you to revoke your lobbying election would not result in you having a lower tax liability
in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than you would have had if the
election had not been timely made. Therefore, the interests of the Government will not be
prejudiced because you have a lower tax liability.
The interests of the Government could also be prejudiced if the taxable year in which the
regulatory election should have been made, or any taxable years that would have been affected
by the election had it been timely made, are closed by the period of limitations on assessment
under § 6501(a) of the Code. § 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) of the miscellaneous regulations. You have
Stipulated that all tax years for which the revocation of your lobbying election should have been
made are not closed by the period of limitations on assessments under § 6501(a). Therefore,
the year in which the election should have been made and the years which the revocation would
affect are still open, and the interests of the Government will not be prejudiced.
Based on all of the facts and information submitted and the representations made, it is our
determination that you acted reasonably and in good faith and granting the requested relief will
not prejudice the interests of the Government.
RULING
Based on your facts and representations, we rule as follows:
You are granted an extension of time of 30 days from the date of this letter ruling to file a
revocation of your lobbying election, to be effective for all tax years beginning after Date 3. You
should attach this letter to your amended return.
This ruling will be made available for public inspection under § 6110 of the Code after certain
deletions of identifying information are made. For details, see enclosed Notice 437, Notice of
Intention to Disclose. A copy of this ruling with deletions that we intend to make available for
public inspection is attached to Notice 437. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, you
should follow the instructions in Notice 437.
This ruling is directed only to the organization that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.
This ruling is based on the facts as they were presented and on the understanding that there will
be no material changes in these facts. This ruling does not address the applicability of any
section of the Code or regulations to the facts submitted other than with respect to the sections
described. Because it could help resolve questions concerning your federal income tax status,
this ruling should be kept in your permanent records.
If you have any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney currently on file with the Internal Revenue Service, we
are sending a copy of this letter to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Ronald Shoemaker
Manager, Exempt Organizations
Technical Group 2
Enclosure
Notice 437
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.