PLR 1238029: IRS waives the 60-day IRA rollover deadline after custodian errors
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An individual asked the IRS to waive the 60-day deadline for rolling an IRA distribution into another IRA. The IRS found that errors by custodians caused the funds to be placed in a non-IRA joint account instead of the requested rollover IRA, and that the taxpayer did not use the funds for another purpose. It waived the deadline and gave the taxpayer 60 days from the ruling date to make the rollover contribution, provided the other requirements of IRC § 408(d)(3) were met. The ruling did not express an opinion on other possible tax consequences.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Should the IRS waive the 60-day IRA rollover requirement because custodian errors prevented a timely rollover?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3)(I); Rev. Proc. 2003-16
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 201238029
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
JUN 25 2012
Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00
Legend:
Taxpayer A:
IRA X:
Amount M:
Custodian N:
Custodian P:
Custodian G:
Financial Institution M:
Dear
This is in response to your letters dated September 30, 2010, June 22, 2011, July 8,
2011, August 23, 2011, and March 29, 2012, submitted on your behalf by your
authorized representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day IRA rollover
requirements contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested.
Taxpayer A, age 45, maintained an Individual Retirement Account (IRA), IRA X
maintained by Custodian N. Taxpayer A, asserts that on April 28, 2009, she intended to
transfer Amount M from IRA X to a rollover IRA at Financial Institution M, and that her
failure to accomplish a rollover of Amount M within the 60-day period prescribed by
section 408(d)(3) of the Code was due to errors on the part of Custodian G, and
Financial Institution M that resulted in Amount M being transferred to a non-IRA
Page 2 201238029
account. Taxpayer A further represents that Amount M has not been used for any other
purpose.
In 2008, Custodian N decided to terminate its services program as of December 31,
2008. All participants with active accounts, including Taxpayer A were requested to
close those accounts either by redeeming out of the account, by transferring, or rolling
over the assets to another custodial account. Custodians P and G were engaged to
administer the Custodian N program's account liquidations, transfers, registration
changes and address changes. As part of the administration of accounts, an associate
at Custodian G, in error, added the name of Taxpayer A’s spouse and their address to
the account registration and account statement mailing address for IRA X.
On April 7th 2009, Taxpayer A selected and contacted a new IRA custodian, Financial
Institution M, and requested that an IRA rollover account be established to accept the
asset transfer from Custodian N via a qualified IRA rollover to the newly established
rollover IRA account at Financial Institution M. Taxpayer A provided Financial Institution
M a copy of her account statement, which, as a result of the error by the associate of
Custodian G, showed her husband as co-owner of IRA X. Based on the incorrect
account statement information processing and contrary to Taxpayer A’s instructions,
Financial Institution M opened a joint non-retirement account. On April 28, 2009,
Amount M was transferred to the non-retirement joint tenant account maintained by
Financial Institution M, instead of to an IRA Rollover account as requested by Taxpayer
A. Taxpayer A believed that Amount M had been properly rolled over to another IRA.
Taxpayer A first discovered there was a problem with her IRA in March 2010 while
preparing her 2009 Federal income tax return. Taxpayer A contacted Custodians P and
G and they recoded the April 2009 transfer to Custodian M as a distribution and issued
a Form 1099-R.
Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue
Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the -
Code with respect to the distribution of Amount M.
Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section
408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income
by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section
72 of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA
rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not
apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if:
Page 3 201238029
(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the
day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or
(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into
such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible
in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).
Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not
apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from
an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such
individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA
which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section
408(d)(3).
Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial
rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure
to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement
Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining
whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section
408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Internal Revenue Service will consider all relevant facts
and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability
to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions
imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for
example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the
time elapsed since the distribution occurred.
The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent
with her assertion that her failure to accomplish a rollover of Amount M within the 60-
day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the Code was due to errors on the part of
employees of Custodian G, and Financial Institution M.
Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Internal Revenue Service
hereby waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount
M from IRA X. Pursuant to this ruling letter, Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days
from the date of the issuance of this letter ruling to make a rollover contribution of
Page 4 201238029
Amount M to a rollover IRA. Provided all other requirements of Code section 408(d)(3),
except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such contribution, Amount M will
be considered a valid rollover contribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(3) of
the Code.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations, which may
be applicable thereto.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling is being
sent to your authorized representative.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
If you have any questions, please contact (I.D.# ) by phone at
or fax at ;
Sincerely yours,
[illegible]
Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 3
Enclosures:
Deleted Copy of Ruling Letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.