Private Letter Ruling 1237002 Released September 14, 2012 Approved

PLR 1237002: Married taxpayers receive more time to elect Canadian RRSP tax deferral

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a married couple 60 days to elect treaty treatment that defers U.S. tax on income accrued in their Canadian registered retirement savings plans, or RRSPs. The couple had moved to the United States, filed joint U.S. returns, and did not know that the election was required. The IRS found that they acted reasonably and in good faith and that granting the extension would not prejudice the government. The taxpayers were also required to file amended returns with Form 8891 for the relevant years and to continue attaching the form for later years until final distributions from the RRSPs.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayers receive more time to elect U.S. tax deferral for income accrued in their Canadian RRSPs?
  • Outcome: Approved, with a 60-day deadline and amended-return and information-reporting conditions.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-23; Article XVIII(7) of the U.S.-Canada income tax treaty

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201237002 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/14/2012 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 9114.03-06
Person To Contact:
--------------------------------------------- ----------------------, ID No. -----------------
-------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------- ---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:B01
PLR-102097-12
Date:
June 15, 2012

              TY: --------------

Legend

Taxpayer = ------------------------

Spouse = ----------------------

Financial Institution = --------------------------

RRSP 1 = ----------------------------

RRSP 2 = ----------------------------

RRSP 3 = ----------------------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Year 3 = -------

Date A = ----------------------

Tax Years = ---------------

PLR-102097-12 2

Dear ---------------------------------------:

This is in reply to a letter dated --------------------------, and additional information
submitted on -----------------, requesting an extension of time under Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3 for Taxpayer and Spouse (the “Taxpayers”) to elect the provisions of Rev.
Proc. 2002-23, 2002-1 C.B. 744, for Tax Years.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the Taxpayers and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by the appropriate parties. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth
below.

FACTS

The Taxpayers are married and filed joint U.S. Federal income tax returns for Tax
Years. Taxpayer is a Canadian citizen who became a U.S. resident in Year 3. Spouse
is a U.S. citizen who lived in Canada, and returned to live in the United States in Year 3.
Taxpayer and Spouse established Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans
(RRSPs), RRSP 1, RRSP 2, and RRSP 3, in Year 1 and Year 2. These RRSPs are
currently held with Financial Institution. Since Taxpayer and Spouse have moved to the
United States in Year 3, neither individual has contributed any money to the RRSPs nor
has either individual withdrawn any money from the RRSPs.

Taxpayer and Spouse self-prepared and filed joint U.S. income tax returns for all Tax
Years using tax preparation software. Taxpayer and Spouse were not aware of the
need to make an election pursuant to paragraph 7 of Article XVIII of the U.S. Canada
income tax treaty (the “Treaty”) in order to defer U.S. tax on income accrued in their
RRSPs.

On Date A, Taxpayer and Spouse read a newspaper article about IRS enforcement of
RRSP reporting for U.S. citizens. After reading the article, they consulted a tax
specialist requesting additional information and guidance.

Taxpayer and Spouse represent that the Internal Revenue Service has not previously
corresponded with them regarding their RRSPs, and that no return is currently under
examination by the Internal Revenue Service, before Appeals, or before a Federal
court.

RULING REQUESTED

PLR-102097-12 3

Taxpayer and Spouse request the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue
Service for an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make an election
pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2002-23, to defer U.S. federal income taxation on income
accrued in RRSP 1, RRSP 2, and RRSP 3, as provided for in Article XVIII(7) of the
Treaty for Tax Years.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief
in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is
prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will
be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that
the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice
the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the election provided in Rev. Proc. 2002-23 is a regulatory
election within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the
Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100–1(c) to grant
the Taxpayers an extension of time, provided that the Taxpayers satisfy the standards
set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).

Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that
Taxpayer and Spouse satisfy the standards of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. Accordingly,
the Taxpayers are granted an extension of time until 60 days from the date of this ruling
letter to make an election for Tax Years under Rev. Proc. 2002-23. As provided in
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a), the granting of an extension of time is not a determination
that the Taxpayers are otherwise eligible to make the above-described election.

Pursuant to section 4.07 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, the election, once made, cannot be
revoked except with the consent of the Commissioner. For Tax Years, Taxpayer and
Spouse must file amended U.S. income tax returns to which they attach Form 8891
(U.S. Information Return for Beneficiaries of Certain Canadian Registered Retirement
Plans) for RRSP 1, RRSP 2, and RRSP 3. For each subsequent tax year through the
tax year in which a final distribution is made from each of their three RRSPs, Taxpayer

PLR-102097-12 4

and Spouse must attach a Form 8891 for each RRSP from which a final distribution has
not been made to their U.S. income tax return.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

A copy of this letter must be attached to Taxpayer and Spouse’s U.S. income tax return
for the year in which Taxpayer and Spouse obtained the ruling and should be
associated with Taxpayer and Spouse’s amended returns for Tax Years.

This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will be sent to
your authorized representatives.

                                        Sincerely,



                                        M. Grace Fleeman
                                        Senior Technical Reviewer, Branch 1
                                        (International)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.