CCA 1236029: Advice addresses use of Form 870-LT for partner-level issues
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advice addressed whether Part II of Form 870-LT could be used instead of Form 870PT(AD) to resolve partner-level issues. The advice states that Part II is a separate agreement executed by both parties for affected items. It can resolve partner-level defenses to a partnership-level penalty and partner-level penalties based on affected items, including at-risk or passive-loss issues. The advice concludes that Appeals may use the form to resolve all of those issues.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can Part II of Form 870-LT be used to resolve partner-level penalty issues?
- Outcome: Advice
- Key authorities: IRC § 6224; Form 870-LT
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2012062108383937 Number: 201236029
Release Date: 9/7/2012
Office: ----------
UILC: 6224.01-02
From: --------------------
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 8:38:52 AM
To: ------------------------
Cc: -----------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: 870PT(AD) versus 870-LT(AD)
Part II of the Form 870-LT is a separate agreement that is separately executed by both parties as to
affected items. It can be used to resolve partner-level defenses to the partnership-level penalty. These
defenses are affected items not determined at the partnership level. It can also be used to determine any
partner-level penalties based on affected items such at risk or passive loss. By using this Form appeals
can resolve all of these issues, so it is appropriate to use it in your case.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.