PLR 201235028: IRS letter addresses a requested waiver of the 60-day IRA rollover deadline

Number
201235028
Outcome
Other outcome
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Rollover Contributions
Code sections
§ 408, § 6110
Ruling dated
June 7, 2012
Publicly released
August 31, 2012

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The taxpayer asked the IRS to waive the 60-day deadline for rolling an IRA distribution into another IRA. The taxpayer intended to move the money into another IRA investment, but a company employee used the wrong form and the money was instead deposited into a revocable trust account and invested in a certificate of deposit. The public PDF contains pages labeled 1, 2, and 5, so pages 3 and 4 and the document's express conclusion are not included. The available text therefore does not establish whether the IRS granted or denied the requested waiver.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the IRS waive the 60-day rollover requirement for an IRA distribution that was misdirected because of an employee's error?
  • Outcome: The available public release does not state the conclusion.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 408(d)(3) and 6110

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 201235028

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

JUN 07 2012

U.I.L. 408.03-00

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

T:EP:RA:T3

Legend:

Taxpayer A = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Individual M = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
IRA X = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Revocable Trust T = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Amount D = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Company F = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Date 1 = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Date 2 = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Date 3 = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Date 4 = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Dear XXXXXXXXX:

This letter is in response to your letter dated XXXXXXXXXXXX, submitted on your behalf, by your authorized representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60 day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

201235028

day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalties of perjury in support of your request.

Taxpayer A represents that he intended to transfer Amount D from IRA X to another IRA investment with Company F within the 60-day period. Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish a transfer within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the Code was due to the error committed by Individual M of Company F. Taxpayer A further asserts that Amount D has not been used for any other purpose.

Taxpayer A maintained IRA X with Company F. On Date 1, Individual M contacted Taxpayer A to review Taxpayer A's IRA portfolio. On Date 2, when Taxpayer A met with Individual M, he was presented with several different options to maximize his earnings in his IRA account. Individual M confirmed with a representative of Company F that the option Taxpayer A selected to maximize his earnings in his IRA was qualified as an IRA investment. As a result, Taxpayer A signed a document presented to him by Company F which he believed was to transfer Amount D from his IRA X to another IRA investment. Amount D was instead wired from his IRA X and deposited in his Revocable Trust T account and invested in a certificate of deposit. Taxpayer A states that the document he signed was in fact not the correct form to process a direct rollover of Amount D as he intended.

In January of 2011, Taxpayer A received Form 1099-R from Company F that showed a taxable distribution of Amount D as well as Form 1099-INT that represented the interest on the new Certificate of Deposit. Upon receiving the form 1099, Taxpayer A immediately called Individual M who assured Taxpayer A that a Form 5498 showing the rollover would soon follow in the mail.

Taxpayer A did not realize that Amount D was not in a qualified IRA until he received Form 1099-R in early January of 2011; at the time he contacted his accountant to prepare his income tax return for 2010. Taxpayer A’s accountant, at his request, contacted Individual M and verified that Amount D was intended to be a rollover and not invested in a taxable Certificate of Deposit account. Individual M assured Taxpayer A that the transaction was a valid rollover, but he would make some inquiries.

On Date 3, Individual M learned that the account had been set up incorrectly by Company F on Date 2 and attempted to resolve the error committed by Company F in setting up an incorrect account. Since Amount D was not placed in a qualified IRA account, Company F was unable to resolve the problem, and

201235028

5

A copy of this ruling is being sent to your authorized representative pursuant to a Power of Attorney on file with this office.

If you have any questions concerning this ruling, please contact [illegible] ID # SE:T:EP:RA:T3, at

Sincerely yours,

[illegible signature]

Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager

Employee Plans Technical Group 3
Enclosures:

Deleted copy of letter ruling
Notice 437

CC:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace