Private Letter Ruling 1233033 Released August 17, 2012 Approved Transcribed from scan

IRS approves a five-year extension for multiemployer plan liabilities

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS approved a plan's request for a five-year automatic extension to amortize unfunded liabilities arising as of January 1, 2008. The extension applied to specified amortization charge bases and was effective for the plan year beginning on the redacted date. The IRS found that the plan submitted the required information under section 431(d)(1), including an actuary's certification that the plan faced a projected accumulated funding deficiency without the extension, had adopted a funding-improvement plan, and was expected to have sufficient assets during the extended period. The letter does not identify the taxpayer, plan, or contact information because those details were redacted before release.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Whether the plan qualified for a five-year extension to amortize specified unfunded liabilities.
  • Outcome: Approved.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 431(d)(1)

Full text (IRS public release)

201233033

Significant Index Number 0431.00-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C, 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

MAR 12 2009\n\nT. E.P.R.A. A2
Re:
Taxpayer =
Dear

This letter constitutes notice that approval has been granted for your request for
a 5-year automatic extension for amortizing the unfunded liabilities as of

January 1, 2008, for the above-named Plan which are described in sections
431(b)(2)(B) and 431(b)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), and sections
304(b)(2)(B) and 304(b)(4) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 ("ERISA"). This extension is effective with the plan year beginning January
1,20 . This extension applies to the amortization charge bases as identified in
your application submission, established as of January 1, 2008, with a total
outstanding balance of $ as of that date.

The extension of the amortization periods of the unfunded liabilities of the Plan
was granted in accordance with section 431(d1) of the Code. Section
431(d)(1)(A) of the Code requires the Secretary to extend the period of time
required to amortize any unfunded liability of a plan for a period of time (not in
excess of 5 years) if the Plan submits an application meeting the criteria stated In
section 431(d)(1)(B). The plan has submitted the required Information to meet
the criteria in section 431(d)(1)(B), including a certification from the plan’s actuary
that:

(i) absent the extension under subparagraph (A), the
plan would have an accumulated funding deficiency In the
current plan year or any of the 9 succeeding plan years,
(il) the plan sponsor has adopted a plan to improve the
plan's funding status,

201233033

2

(iil) the plan Is projected to have sufficient assets to
timely pay expected benefits and anticipated expenditures
over the amortization period as extended, and

(iv) the notice required under paragraph (3)(A) has been
provided,

We have sent a copy of this letter to the
and to the

This ruling Is directed only to the taxpayer that requested It. Section 6110(k)(3)

of the Internal Revenue Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others
as precedent.

If you require further assistance In this matter, please contact
Sincerely yours,

David M. Ziegler
Manager, EP Actuarial Group 2

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.