Private Letter Ruling 1233023 Released August 17, 2012 Approved Transcribed from scan

IRS approves limited reversion treatment for defined benefit plan contributions

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS approved a request involving employer contributions to a qualified defined benefit pension plan. It determined that contributions totaling a redacted amount may be treated as disallowed solely for purposes of applying Rev. Rul. 91-4. A return of contributions not exceeding the redacted amount would not adversely affect the plan's qualified status if the reversion occurred within one year after the ruling letter. The ruling did not express an opinion on the accuracy or acceptability of the calculations submitted with the request.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could certain employer contributions be treated as disallowed so that a limited reversion would not adversely affect the plan's qualification?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 404; Rev. Proc. 90-49; Rev. Rul. 91-4

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0404.00-00

201233023

Department of The Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
Washington, D.C. 20224

MAR 25 2011

T.E.P.R.A. '82

Re:

Dear

This letter is in response to your request with respect to the above-referenced defined
benefit pension plan pursuant to Revenue Procedure 90-49 for the plan year
commencing January 1, 20 .

Rev. Proc. 90-49 sets forth the procedure whereby, under certain circumstances, a
disallowance of the deduction of employer contributions to a qualified defined benefit
plan may be obtained; thereby fulfilling a condition under which such contributions
could revert to the employer.

Based on the information submitted, we have determined that contributions totaling

$ which were made for the plan year commencing January 1, 20 , may be
considered as disallowed solely for the purpose of applying Rev. Rul. 91-4. Therefore
the return of contributions not exceeding $
would not adversely affect the
qualified status of the plan, providing this reversion occurs no later than one year from
the date of this letter. In granting this approval, we are not expressing any opinions as
to the accuracy or acceptability of any calculations or other material submitted with
your request.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

When filing Forms 5500 for the plan years commencing January 1, 2008, a copy of
this letter must be attached to the Schedule B. A copy of this letter should be
furnished to the enrolled actuary for the plan. We have sent a copy to your authorized
representative pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office.

201233023

If you require further assistance concerning this matter, please contact

Sincerely yours,

David M. Ziegler, Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 2

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.