PLR 201232025: IRS grants more time to elect treaty deferral for Canadian retirement plans

Number
201232025
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other; Canada
Code sections
§ 301.9100-1, § 301.9100-3, § 6110
Ruling dated
May 16, 2012
Publicly released
August 10, 2012

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Two married taxpayers maintained Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans after moving to the United States. They had not filed the required Forms 8891 or otherwise elected under Article XVIII(7) of the U.S.-Canada Income Tax Treaty to defer current U.S. income taxation of the plans' accrued earnings. The IRS granted them 60 days to make the election for the specified tax years. The taxpayers also had to file amended returns with the required forms and continue attaching Forms 8891 for later years until final distributions.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayers receive an extension to elect treaty deferral for income accrued in their Canadian retirement plans?
  • Outcome: Approved.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-23; Article XVIII(7) of the U.S.-Canada Income Tax Treaty; § 6110(k)(3).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201232025
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/10/2012
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 9114.03-06
-----------------------------, ID No. --------------
-----------------
Telephone Number:
-------------------
--------------------
----------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------------------
CC:INTL:B01
-----------------
PLR-149362-11
----------------------------------
Date:
------------------------------
May 16, 2012

TY: --------------

Legend

Taxpayer A = -----------------------
------------------------

Taxpayer B = -----------------
------------------------

Financial Institution = --------------------------

RRSP 1 = --------------------------
---------------------------

RRSP 2 = --------------------------
---------------------------

Tax Years 1-6 = --------------

Tax Year 1 = ---------

Tax Years 2-4 = --------------

Tax Years 5-6 = --------------

Year 1 = ---------

Year 2 = -------

Date A = --------------------------

Date B = -------------------------

Date C = -------------------------

Tax Preparer 1 = --------------------------------------------

Tax Preparer 2 = ---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tax Preparer 3 = ------------------

Dear ---------------------------

This is in reply to a letter dated Date A requesting an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 for Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B (collectively, “Taxpayers”) to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, 2002-1 C.B. 744, with respect to Tax Years. Additional information was submitted by Taxpayers in letters dated Date B and Date C.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by Taxpayers and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the requested ruling, it is subject to verification on examination. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

FACTS

Taxpayer A and B are married and filed joint Federal income tax returns for Tax Years. Taxpayer A is a Canadian citizen and also a United States permanent resident. Taxpayer B holds dual United States and Canadian citizenship.

Taxpayers lived in Canada until Year 1 when they moved to the United States. While living and working in Canada, Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B each established and contributed to separate Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs) with Financial Institution, RRSP 1 (Taxpayer A) and RRSP 2 (Taxpayer B).

Taxpayer A ceased making annual contributions to RRSP 1 after moving to the United States in Year 1. Taxpayer B ceased making annual contributions to RRSP 2 several years before Taxpayers moved to the United States. Both Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B continued to maintain RRSP 1 and RRSP 2 with Financial Institution after moving to the United States. At all times relevant to this ruling request, recognition of the accrued earnings in RRSP 1 and RRSP 2 has been deferred for U.S. income tax purposes. Neither Taxpayer A nor Taxpayer B has withdrawn any funds or received any distributions from RRSP 1 or RRSP 2.

Taxpayer A prepared the joint income tax return he and Taxpayer B filed for Tax Year 1. Tax Preparer 1 prepared Taxpayers’ joint income tax returns for Tax Years 2-4. Tax Preparer 2 prepared Taxpayers’ joint income tax returns for Tax Years 5-6.

Taxpayer A was not aware that he and Taxpayer B should elect to defer current U.S. income taxation on the earnings in RRSP 1 and RRSP 2 pursuant to Article XVIII(7) of the U.S.-Canada Income Tax Treaty (Treaty) when he prepared the Tax Year 1 return. Neither Tax Preparer 1 nor Tax Preparer 2 advised Taxpayers they should elect to defer current U.S. income taxation on earnings in RRSP 1 and RRSP 2 pursuant to the Treaty.

Taxpayers became aware of the need to file Form 8891, “U.S. Information Return for Beneficiaries of Certain Registered Retirement Plans,” to defer current income taxation of the earnings in RRSP 1 and RRSP 2 pursuant to the Treaty only after Taxpayer B hired Tax Preparer 3 to prepare her Year 2 income tax return. As part of his review of Taxpayers’ tax and financial records, Tax Preparer 3 determined that neither Taxpayer A nor Taxpayer B had ever elected to defer current U.S. income taxation of the accrued earnings in RRSP 1 or RRSP 2 pursuant to the Treaty. Taxpayers state that no return is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service, before Appeals, or before a Federal court.

RULING REQUESTED

Taxpayers request the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service for an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make an election pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2002-23, to defer U.S. federal income taxation on income accrued in RRSP 1 and RRSP 2, as provided for in Article XVIII(7) of the Treaty, for Tax Years 1-6.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the election provided in Rev. Proc. 2002-23 is a regulatory election within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100–1(c) to grant Taxpayer A an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer A satisfies the standards set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).

Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that Taxpayers satisfy the standards of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. Accordingly, Taxpayers are granted an extension of time until 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to make an election for Tax Years 1-6 under Rev. Proc. 2002-23. As provided in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a), the granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayers are otherwise eligible to make the above-described election.

Pursuant to section 4.07 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, the election once made cannot be revoked except with the consent of the Commissioner. For Tax Years 1-6, Taxpayers must file an amended U.S. income tax return to which a Form 8891, for each RRSP, is attached. For each subsequent tax year, a Form 8891 for RRSP 1 and a Form 8891 for RRSP 2 must be attached to the appropriate U.S. income tax return through the year in which a final distribution is made from the respective RRSP.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

A copy of this letter must be attached to Taxpayers’ U.S. income tax return or returns for the year in which Taxpayers obtained the ruling and should be associated with Taxpayers’ amended returns for Tax Years 1-6.

This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will be sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Craig R. Gilbert
Special Counsel to the Deputy Associate Chief Counsel (International Field Service and Litigation) Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International)

Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace