PLR 1232025: IRS grants more time to elect treaty deferral for Canadian retirement plans
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Two married taxpayers maintained Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans after moving to the United States. They had not filed the required Forms 8891 or otherwise elected under Article XVIII(7) of the U.S.-Canada Income Tax Treaty to defer current U.S. income taxation of the plans' accrued earnings. The IRS granted them 60 days to make the election for the specified tax years. The taxpayers also had to file amended returns with the required forms and continue attaching Forms 8891 for later years until final distributions.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the taxpayers receive an extension to elect treaty deferral for income accrued in their Canadian retirement plans?
- Outcome: Approved.
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-23; Article XVIII(7) of the U.S.-Canada Income Tax Treaty; § 6110(k)(3).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201232025 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/10/2012 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 9114.03-06 -----------------------------, ID No. --------------
-----------------
Telephone Number:
------------------- --------------------
---------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------ CC:INTL:B01
----------------- PLR-149362-11
---------------------------------- Date:
------------------------------ May 16, 2012
TY: --------------
Legend
Taxpayer A = -----------------------
------------------------
Taxpayer B = -----------------
------------------------
Financial Institution = --------------------------
RRSP 1 = --------------------------
---------------------------
RRSP 2 = --------------------------
---------------------------
Tax Years 1-6 = --------------
Tax Year 1 = ---------
Tax Years 2-4 = --------------
Tax Years 5-6 = --------------
Year 1 = ---------
Year 2 = -------
Date A = --------------------------
Date B = -------------------------
Date C = -------------------------
Tax Preparer 1 = --------------------------------------------
Tax Preparer 2 = ---------------------------------------------------------------
Tax Preparer 3 = ------------------
Dear ---------------------------
This is in reply to a letter dated Date A requesting an extension of time under Treas.
Reg. § 301.9100-3 for Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B (collectively, “Taxpayers”) to elect
the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, 2002-1 C.B. 744, with respect to Tax Years.
Additional information was submitted by Taxpayers in letters dated Date B and Date C.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by Taxpayers and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the requested ruling, it is subject to verification on examination. The
information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.
FACTS
Taxpayer A and B are married and filed joint Federal income tax returns for Tax Years.
Taxpayer A is a Canadian citizen and also a United States permanent resident.
Taxpayer B holds dual United States and Canadian citizenship.
Taxpayers lived in Canada until Year 1 when they moved to the United States. While
living and working in Canada, Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B each established and
contributed to separate Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs) with
Financial Institution, RRSP 1 (Taxpayer A) and RRSP 2 (Taxpayer B).
Taxpayer A ceased making annual contributions to RRSP 1 after moving to the United
States in Year 1. Taxpayer B ceased making annual contributions to RRSP 2
several years before Taxpayers moved to the United States. Both Taxpayer A and
Taxpayer B continued to maintain RRSP 1 and RRSP 2 with Financial Institution after
moving to the United States. At all times relevant to this ruling request, recognition of
the accrued earnings in RRSP 1 and RRSP 2 has been deferred for U.S. income tax
purposes. Neither Taxpayer A nor Taxpayer B has withdrawn any funds or received
any distributions from RRSP 1 or RRSP 2.
Taxpayer A prepared the joint income tax return he and Taxpayer B filed for Tax Year 1.
Tax Preparer 1 prepared Taxpayers’ joint income tax returns for Tax Years 2-4. Tax
Preparer 2 prepared Taxpayers’ joint income tax returns for Tax Years 5-6.
Taxpayer A was not aware that he and Taxpayer B should elect to defer current U.S.
income taxation on the earnings in RRSP 1 and RRSP 2 pursuant to Article XVIII(7) of
the U.S.-Canada Income Tax Treaty (Treaty) when he prepared the Tax Year 1 return.
Neither Tax Preparer 1 nor Tax Preparer 2 advised Taxpayers they should elect to defer
current U.S. income taxation on earnings in RRSP 1 and RRSP 2 pursuant to the
Treaty.
Taxpayers became aware of the need to file Form 8891, “U.S. Information Return for
Beneficiaries of Certain Registered Retirement Plans,” to defer current income taxation
of the earnings in RRSP 1 and RRSP 2 pursuant to the Treaty only after Taxpayer B
hired Tax Preparer 3 to prepare her Year 2 income tax return. As part of his review of
Taxpayers’ tax and financial records, Tax Preparer 3 determined that neither Taxpayer
A nor Taxpayer B had ever elected to defer current U.S. income taxation of the accrued
earnings in RRSP 1 or RRSP 2 pursuant to the Treaty. Taxpayers state that no return
is currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service, before Appeals, or
before a Federal court.
RULING REQUESTED
Taxpayers request the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service for
an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make an election pursuant to
Rev. Proc. 2002-23, to defer U.S. federal income taxation on income accrued in RRSP
1 and RRSP 2, as provided for in Article XVIII(7) of the Treaty, for Tax Years 1-6.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief
in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is
prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will
be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that
the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice
the interests of the Government.
In the present situation, the election provided in Rev. Proc. 2002-23 is a regulatory
election within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the
Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100–1(c) to grant
Taxpayer A an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer A satisfies the standards set
forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).
Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that
Taxpayers satisfy the standards of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. Accordingly, Taxpayers
are granted an extension of time until 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to make
an election for Tax Years 1-6 under Rev. Proc. 2002-23. As provided in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-1(a), the granting of an extension of time is not a determination that
Taxpayers are otherwise eligible to make the above-described election.
Pursuant to section 4.07 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, the election once made cannot be
revoked except with the consent of the Commissioner. For Tax Years 1-6, Taxpayers
must file an amended U.S. income tax return to which a Form 8891, for each RRSP, is
attached. For each subsequent tax year, a Form 8891 for RRSP 1 and a Form 8891
for RRSP 2 must be attached to the appropriate U.S. income tax return through the year
in which a final distribution is made from the respective RRSP.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.
A copy of this letter must be attached to Taxpayers’ U.S. income tax return or returns for
the year in which Taxpayers obtained the ruling and should be associated with
Taxpayers’ amended returns for Tax Years 1-6.
This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will be sent to
your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Craig R. Gilbert
Special Counsel to the Deputy Associate Chief
Counsel (International Field Service and Litigation)
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International)
Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.