Written determination 1231012: IRS denies exemption to a community wireless-network organization
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS issued a final adverse determination after a proposed denial of exemption was not protested within 30 days. The organization planned to provide free community Internet access through a wireless mesh network, but it was formed and controlled by a for-profit entity that would receive prominent sponsorship and promotional exposure. The IRS concluded that the organization's activities served substantial private and commercial interests and therefore did not qualify under IRC § 501(c)(3). The letter states that contributions are not deductible under § 170 and directs the organization to file federal income tax returns.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Does a community wireless-network organization qualify for exemption under IRC § 501(c)(3)?
- Outcome: Revocation
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(a), 501(c)(3), 170, 6110, and 7428; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1), 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1), and 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii); Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279 (1945); KJ’s Fund Raisers, Inc. v. Commissioner, 74 T.C.M. 669 (1997).
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
Release Number 201231012 Contact Person:
Release Date: 8/3/2012
Date: May 8, 2012 Identification Number:
UIL: 501.03-00
Contact Number:
Employer Identification Number:
Form Required To Be Filed:
Tax Years:
Dear
This is our final determination that you do not qualify for exemption from Federal income tax as
an organization described in Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3). Recently, we sent you a
letter in response to your application that proposed an adverse determination. The letter
explained the facts, law and rationale, and gave you 30 days to file a protest. Since we did not
receive a protest within the requisite 30 days, the proposed adverse determination is now final.
Because you do not qualify for exemption as an organization described in Code section
501(c)(3), donors may not deduct contributions to you under Code section 170. You must file
Federal income tax returns on the form and for the years listed above within 30 days of this
letter, unless you request an extension of time to file. File the returns in accordance with their
instructions, and do not send them to this office. Failure to file the returns timely may result in a
penalty.
We will make this letter and our proposed adverse determination letter available for public
inspection under Code section 6110, after deleting certain identifying information. Please read
the enclosed Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose, and review the two attached letters that
show our proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the
instructions in Notice 437. If you agree with our deletions, you do not need to take any further
action.
If you have any questions about this letter, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter. If you have any questions about your
Federal income tax status and responsibilities, please contact IRS Customer Service at
1-800-829-1040 or the IRS Customer Service number for businesses, 1-800-829-4933. The
IRS Customer Service number for people with hearing impairments is 1-800-829-4059.
Sincerely,
Director, Exempt Organizations
Enclosure
Notice 437
Redacted Proposed Adverse Determination Letter
Redacted Final Adverse Determination Letter
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
Date: February 8, 2012 Contact Person:
UIL: 501.03-00 Identification Number:
Contact Number:
FAX Number:
Employer Identification Number:
Legend:
M =
State =
x =
y =
z =
City =
Date =
Dear
We have considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income tax
under § 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Based on the information provided, we
have concluded that you do not qualify for exemption under § 501(c)(3). The basis for our
conclusion is set forth below.
Facts:
You are organized as a non-profit corporation under State law. Your stated purpose is the
provision and promotion of free community Internet access throughout State, primarily through
wireless mesh networking, and the education of others regarding the benefits of Internet and
wireless mesh networking technology.
To further your stated purpose, you state that you will develop, deploy and support a public
wireless mesh network that allows members of the general public to connect to the Internet for
free. You state that a public wireless mesh network is established and developed by
strategically deploying at no cost, wireless signal repeaters to businesses as well as various
other private and public locations throughout the community. Once these signal repeaters are
plugged in and connected to the Internet, any member of the general public that is within reach
of the signal of one of the wireless signal repeaters can connect to the Internet with a computer,
mobile phone or other wireless Internet-enabled device. Each person or entity that hosts a
wireless signal repeater will need to provide a minimal amount of electricity to power the
wireless signal repeater. Each wireless signal repeater host will be required to pay you a $50
security deposit upon receipt of the wireless signal repeater, which would be returned to the
hosting individual when the wireless signal repeater was returned intact to you.
You state that “by promoting and providing free Internet access, the underprivileged and elderly
will be better able to access support services online, connect with their fellow community
members via email and have a greater access to employment.” You plan to do this by
distributing flyers describing how this public wireless network operates and how and where it
can be accessed as well as stickers for individual businesses to place in their windows so
members of the public know that a free wireless signal is available in that area. In addition, you
plan to use your website, personal letters and in-person meetings to educate community
members on how to access the network. You do not restrict who may access the network nor
do you focus your service to any particular class of persons.
The mayor of City, in a letter dated Date, praised and expressed approval of the work being
accomplished through you and encouraged the community to support such work. However,
other than this letter, you did not provide any additional information on local government
involvement or oversight.
You intend to enter into a written agreement with M, the for-profit entity that caused you to be
formed, to provide you with financial and in-kind support over a multi-year period. M will provide
you with assets and intangibles described in the agreement valued in excess of $x. M will also
provide $y to be paid in two installments during the period in which the agreement is effective as
well as z ‘man hours’ of staff time to provide you with administrative and technical support. In
exchange, you will provide to M promotional consideration in which you will “prominently list M”
as your primary sponsor on your website and in your collateral and marketing materials.
You are governed by a board of directors who are elected by a vote of your sole member, M, a
for-profit entity. The number of directors shall not be less than five members. The board may
be enlarged by a vote of your sole member. At least three of your directors shall have no
ownership interest in M. In addition, M may remove any officer or director with or without cause.
You have formed a disinterested members committee. The disinterested members committee
is a committee, appointed by the chair of the board of directors, consisting of directors who do
not possess an ownership interest in M. The committee shall be charged with, as may be
necessary, investigating and resolving, as appropriate, issues and questions relating to the
existence of pecuniary benefit transactions and conflicts of interest and shall meet on an as
needed basis, but not less than once each year. In contrast, the board of directors shall meet,
at a minimum, on a quarterly basis. The board shall exercise all powers not otherwise
delegated by law, the articles of agreement or by-laws.
Law:
Section 501(c)(3) of the Code provides exemption from federal income tax for organizations
organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational or other exempt purposes.
Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations (“regulations”) provides that, in order
to be exempt as an organization described in § 501(c)(3), an organization must be both
organized and operated exclusively for one or more purposes specified in such section. If an
organization fails to meet either the organizational test or the operational test, it is not exempt.
Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the regulations provides that an organization will be regarded as
“operated exclusively” for one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities
which accomplish one or more of such exempt purposes specified in § 501(c)(3). An
organization will not be so regarded if more than an insubstantial part of its activities is not in
furtherance of an exempt purpose.
Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) of the regulations provides that an organization is not organized or
operated exclusively for one or more exempt purposes unless it serves a public rather than a
private interest. Thus, to meet this requirement, it is necessary for an organization to establish
that it is not organized or operated for the benefit of private interests.
In Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C. v. U. S., 326 U.S. 279 (1945), the court held that
an organization was not organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes. The court
reasoned that the presence of a single nonexempt purpose, if substantial in nature, would
destroy the exemption regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt purposes.
in KJ’s Fund Raisers, Inc. v. Commissioner, 74 T.C.M. 669 (1997), the court held that a
nonprofit organization, which sold lottery tickets on the premises of a for-profit business had a
substantial non-exempt purpose to enhance the profits of the for-profit business. The owners of
the for-profit business to purportedly raise funds for distribution to charitable causes formed the
nonprofit organization. The nonprofit’s lottery tickets were sold during the regular business
hours by the owners and employees of the for-profit business. The owners of the for-profit
initially controlled the board and later indicated that it would vest control in unrelated parties.
The nonprofit opined that the organization “would fold without the original founders of the
organization as officers.” In finding that the nonprofit had a substantial nonexempt purpose,
which was promoting the for-profit, the court reasoned that the identity of the for-profit owners
and the officer of the nonprofit placed the owners of the for-profit in a position to control the
nonprofit. Additionally, the court found that the publicity received by the for-profit was a
significant benefit.
Analysis:
Based on the information and supporting documentation you provided in your application, you
have failed to establish that your activities will further a charitable purpose, and that you will not
be operated for a substantial nonexempt private purpose. An organization cannot be
recognized as exempt under § 501(c)(3) unless it shows that it is both organized and operated
exclusively for one or more exempt purposes.
You have failed to establish that your activities will not serve the private interests of M or its
owners, directors, and officers. As stated in Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., 326
U.S. 279, the presence of a single nonexempt purpose, if substantial in nature, will destroy the
exemption, regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt purposes. Section
1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii) of the regulations provides that an organization does not operate
exclusively for exempt purposes if it operates for the benefit of private interests.
You state that you have a close connection with M. You operate in substantially the same field,
providing Internet access, with M providing the networking capabilities and support services.
You were formed by M and while you exist as a separate legal entity, you are clearly controlled
by the officers and directors of M. Your officers and directors may be elected or removed by M
with or without cause. In addition, your employees are the employees of M. Moreover, in KJ’s
Fund Raisers, Inc., 74 T.C.M. 669 (1997), the court held that a nonprofit’s activities served the
commercial purposes of the for-profit organizations that formed it, even where individuals
unrelated to the for-profit organizations formally controlled the nonprofit.
Your primary purpose is to benefit private interests. While you provided a letter from the mayor
of the local area that you will operate in, you have not shown that the government has any other
interest or oversight in you or your activities. You advertise on behalf of your sole member, M, a
for-profit entity. You plan to enter into an agreement whereby M’s sponsorship will be
prominently displayed on all information materials. M, as your sole member, has discretion and
control of your operations through its appointment and removal power over the board of
directors and officers. Although you have a “disinterested members” committee, this committee
does not possess actual authority over day to day operations and is only convened on an as
needed basis or at least once a year.
In addition to the advertising for M, you state that you will promote public access to the Internet,
by providing free equipment to businesses for use at no charge by their customers. Such
customer access enhances the ability of businesses to attract customers. Therefore, you are
organized and operated for the benefit of private interests.
Your primary activity, developing, deploying and supporting a public wireless mesh network,
serves the interests of the general public and not a specific charitable class. While you may
engage in some educational activity through distribution of information on how this wireless
network operates and how and where it can be accessed, this activity is minor compared to your
service provider activity which is more than an insubstantial part of your total activities. Such
activity furthers a commercial purpose not an exempt purpose. Therefore, you are not operated
exclusively for one or more exempt purposes specified in § 501(c)(3) of the Code.
Based on the foregoing, you do not qualify for exemption under § 501(c)(3). You have not
demonstrated that you operate primarily for charitable purposes pursuant to § 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) or 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii). Instead, you operate for a substantial nonexempt purpose.
Conclusion:
Accordingly, you do not qualify for exemption as an organization described in § 501(c)(3) of the
Code. You must file federal income tax returns. Contributions to you are not deductible under
section 170 of the Code.
You have the right to file a protest if you believe this determination is incorrect. To protest, you
must submit a statement of your views and fully explain your reasoning. You must submit the
statement, signed by one of your officers, within 30 days from the date of this letter. We will
consider your statement and decide if the information affects our determination.
Your protest statement should be accompanied by the following declaration:
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this protest statement, including
accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statement
contains all the relevant facts, and such facts are true, correct, and complete.
You also have a right to request a conference to discuss your protest. This request should be
made when you file your protest statement. An attorney, certified public accountant, or an
individual enrolled to practice before the Internal Revenue Service may represent you. If you
want representation during the conference procedures, you must file a proper power of attorney,
Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, if you have not already done
so. For more information about representation, see Publication 947, Practice before the IRS
and Power of Attorney. All forms and publications mentioned in this letter can be found at
www.irs.gov, Forms and Publications.
If you do not file a protest within 30 days, you will not be able to file a suit for declaratory
judgment in court because the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will consider the failure to protest
as a failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. Code section 7428(b)(2) provides, in
part, that a declaratory judgment or decree shall not be issued in any proceeding unless the Tax
Court, the United States Court of Federal Claims, or the District Court of the United States for
the District of Columbia determines that the organization involved has exhausted all of the
administrative remedies available to it within the IRS.
If you do not intend to protest this determination, you do not need to take any further action. If
we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will issue a final adverse determination letter. That
letter will provide information about filing tax returns and other matters.
Please send your protest statement, Form 2848 and any supporting documents to this address:
Internal Revenue Service
SE:T:EO:RA:T:3,
Attn:
1111 Constitution Ave, N.W.
Washington, DC 20224-0002
You may also fax your statement using the fax number shown in the heading of this letter. If
you fax your statement, please call the person identified in the heading of this letter to confirm
that he or she received your fax.
If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are
shown in the heading of this letter.
Sincerely,
Director, Exempt Organizations
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.