PLR 201228024: IRS restores S corporation status after an inadvertent termination

Number
201228024
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 1366, § 1367, § 1368, § 6110
Ruling dated
February 7, 2012
Publicly released
July 13, 2012

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation's election terminated when a trust that held its stock failed to make an electing small business trust election. The stock then passed to another trust before being transferred to two eligible shareholders. The IRS concluded that the termination was inadvertent and allowed the corporation to be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from the termination date, assuming its election was otherwise valid. It also treated each trust as an electing small business trust for the period when it held the stock, subject to filing returns consistent with that treatment. The corporation and its shareholders had to follow the required S corporation reporting, basis, and distribution rules, or the ruling would be null and void.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation continue to be treated as an S corporation after its election terminated because a trust shareholder failed to make an ESBT election?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361, 1362(f), 1366, 1367, and 1368

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201228024
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/13/2012
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 1362.04-00
----------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------
------------------------
Refer Reply To:
-----------------
CC:PSI:B03
--------------------------------
PLR-144665-11
------------------------
Date:
February 07, 2012

X = -----------------
-----------------------------------------------------------

Trust 1 = --------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------

Trust 2 = ------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------

D1 = -------------------

Dear ---------------:

This responds to a letter dated October 14, 2011, and subsequent correspondence, submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representatives requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

X made an election to be treated as an S corporation. X’s election was inadvertently terminated effective D1, when Trust 1 ceased to qualify as an eligible shareholder by failing to make an electing small business trust (“ESBT”) election. Trust 1 transferred its X stock to Trust 2, which held the X stock until it transferred the stock to two eligible shareholders. X represents that the termination was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments that the Commissioner may require, consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of
PLR-144665-11
2

§ 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to
§ 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the termination of X’s S corporation election on D1 was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). We further hold that, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from D1 and thereafter, provided X’s S corporation election was valid and provided that the election was not otherwise terminated under § 1361(d). Moreover, each of Trust 1 and Trust 2 will be treated as an ESBT during the period for which it held X stock, provided each trust files income tax returns for such period consistent with an ESBT election having been made.

This ruling is conditioned upon X and all its shareholders treating X as having been an S corporation for the termination period and thereafter. Moreover, the shareholders of X must include their pro rata share of the separately stated and nonseparately computed items of income, loss, deduction, or credit as provided in § 1366, make any adjustments to basis as provided in § 1367, and take into account any distributions made by X as provided in § 1368. If X or its shareholders fail to treat themselves as described above, this ruling is null and void.
PLR-144665-11
3

Except as specifically ruled above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the transactions described above under any other provisions of the Code. This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Pursuant to a power of attorney on file, we are sending a copy of this letter to X’s authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

/s/

Richard T. Probst
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace