Private Letter Ruling 1224015 Released June 15, 2012 Approved

PLR 1224015: IRS allows a late Canadian RRSP tax-deferral election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a taxpayer 60 days to make a late election to defer U.S. federal income tax on income accruing in one Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plan. An accounting firm had filed the election for a second RRSP but missed the first account, and the taxpayers later discovered the error during a detailed review. The ruling requires an amended U.S. income tax return with Form 8891 for the missed account and additional Forms 8891 for later years through the final distribution. The IRS stated that the extension did not determine whether the taxpayer was otherwise eligible for the election.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer make a late election under the U.S.-Canada treaty and Rev. Proc. 2002-23 for the missed RRSP account?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days from the ruling date to make the election.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; U.S.-Canada income tax treaty Article XVIII(7); Rev. Proc. 2002-23

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201224015 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/15/2012 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 9114.03-06 ----------------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
--------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------------------- CC:INTL:B01
----------------------------------- PLR-138180-11
----------- Date:
March 13, 2012

               TY:--------

Legend

Taxpayer = --------------------
--------------------------

Spouse = ------------------------
--------------------------

RRSP 1 = --------------------------------
-------------------------------

RRSP 2 = --------------------------------
--------------------------------

Accounting Firm 1 = ----------------------------------------------------

Accounting Firm 2 = -----------------

Accounting Firm 3 = ------------------------

Tax Year = -------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Year 3 = -------

Year 4 = -------
PLR-138180-11 2

Year 5 = -------

Dear ----------------------------:

This is in reply to a letter dated August 29, 2011, requesting an extension of time under
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 for Taxpayer and Spouse to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc.
2002-23, 2002-1 C.B. 744, for Tax Year.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayers and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by the appropriate parties. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth
below.

FACTS

Taxpayer and Spouse each have two Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans
(RRSPs). Prior to Year 1, Spouse opened two RRSP accounts and filed U.S. federal
income tax returns with an attached Form 8833 claiming treaty benefits under Article
XVIII(7) of the U.S.-Canada income tax treaty (the “Treaty”). In Year 2, Taxpayer
opened two RRSP accounts, RRSP 1 and RRSP 2, using funds from his former
employer’s pension plan.

In Year 2, Taxpayer and Spouse engaged Accounting Firm 1 to prepare their U.S. and
Canadian individual income tax returns and relied on Accounting Firm 1 to prepare
these returns correctly. In Year 2, Taxpayer provided information with respect to RRSP
2 to Accounting Firm, not realizing that he did not provide information with respect to
RRSP 1. Accounting Firm 1 prepared Form 8891 for RRSP 2 making an election to
defer U.S. income tax on income accruing in RRSP 2 pursuant to Article XVIII(7) of the
Treaty. However, Accounting Firm 1 did not make such election for RRSP 1, believing
that RRSP 2 was the only RRSP account owned by Taxpayer during Year 2. During
preparation of Taxpayer’s and Spouse’s Year 3 income tax returns, Accounting Firm 1
discovered that the Taxpayer had two RRSP accounts, and prepared the Year 3 Form
8891 for both RRSP 1 and RRSP 2.

For Year 3 through Year 4, Taxpayer filed Forms 8891 for both RRSP 1 and RRSP 2.

In Year 5, during a detailed review of Taxpayer’s and Spouse’s accounts, Accounting
Firm 2 discovered the failure to make the Year 2 election to defer U.S. income tax on
income accruing in RRSP 1. Accounting Firm 2 consulted with Accounting Firm 3
regarding this matter and discovered that a Private Letter Ruling could be requested to
correct the failure to make a timely election under Article XVIII(7). Taxpayer and
PLR-138180-11 3

Spouse immediately engaged Accounting Firm 3 to prepare the request for an
extension of time to file a late election under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3.

As of Year 5, Taxpayer and Spouse represent that the Internal Revenue Service has
not corresponded with them regarding their RRSPs.

RULING REQUESTED

Taxpayer and Spouse request the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue
Service for an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make an election
pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2002-23, to defer U.S. federal income taxation on income
accrued in RRSP 1, as provided for in Article XVIII(7) of the Treaty for Tax Year.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief
in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is
prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will
be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that
the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice
the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the election provided in Rev. Proc. 2002-23 is a regulatory
election within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the
Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100–1(c) to grant
Taxpayer and Spouse an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer and Spouse satisfy
the standards set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).

Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that
Taxpayer and Spouse satisfy the standards of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. Accordingly,
Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 60 days from the date of this ruling letter
to make an election for Tax Year under Rev. Proc. 2002-23. As provided in Treas. Reg.
§ 301.9100-1(a), the granting of an extension of time is not a determination that
Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the above-described election.
PLR-138180-11 4

Pursuant to section 4.07 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, the election, once made, cannot be
revoked except with the consent of the Commissioner. For Tax Year, Taxpayer and
Spouse must file an amended U.S. income tax return to which they attach Form 8891
(U.S. Information Return for Beneficiaries of Certain Canadian Registered Retirement
Plans) for RRSP 1. For each subsequent tax year through the tax year in which a final
distribution is made from RRSP 1, Taxpayer and Spouse must attach a Form 8891 for
RRSP 1 to their U.S. income tax return.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

A copy of this letter must be attached to Taxpayer and Spouse’s U.S. income tax return
for the year in which Taxpayer and Spouse obtained the ruling and should be
associated with Taxpayer and Spouse’s amended returns for Tax Years.

This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will be sent to
your authorized representatives.

                                    Sincerely,



                                    M Grace Fleeman
                                    Senior Technical Reviewer, Branch 1
                                    (International)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.