IRS declines to waive a 60-day rollover deadline after a taxpayer lost household items during a move
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS declined to waive the 60-day deadline for rolling a distribution from an employee plan into an IRA. The taxpayer said that he was preoccupied with recovering furniture and other household items lost during a move and forgot the deadline. The IRS found that he had more than two months to address the loss before taking the distribution and that the circumstances did not prevent him from completing the rollover. The distribution therefore was not treated as a valid rollover contribution under IRC § 402(c)(3)(B).
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the IRS waive the 60-day rollover deadline because the taxpayer was occupied with recovering lost household items?
- Outcome: Denied.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(31), 402(c), 402(d)(6), and 6110(k)(3); Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(31), Q&A-15; Rev. Proc. 2003-16
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES DIVISION
MAR 09 2012
201222051
Uniform Issue List: 402.00-00
T:EP:RA:T1
Legend:
Taxpayer A = [illegible]
Plan B = [illegible]
Account C = [illegible]
Financial Institution D = [illegible]
IRA E = [illegible]
Amount 1 = [illegible]
Dear [illegible]:
This letter is in response to a request for a letter ruling dated September 29, 2011,
as supplemented by additional information dated January 10, 2012, from your
authorized representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover
requirement contained in section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code
("Code"), regarding the distribution of Amount 1 from Plan B.
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury
in support of the ruling requested:
Taxpayer A, age 57, represents that he took a distribution of Amount 1 from Plan B.
Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period
prescribed by section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code was the result of being preoccupied
with recovering several of his household items which were lost when he moved
following his retirement.
201222051
Page 2
Taxpayer A moved from New Orleans, Louisiana to Portsmouth, Virginia on August 25,
2010. During the move, several items of furniture were lost. On August 31, 2010,
Taxpayer A retired. On October 28, 2010, Taxpayer A received a distribution of Amount
1 from Plan B. He immediately deposited the check for Amount 1 into Account C, a
non-IRA account with Financial Institution D. Taxpayer A indicated that he intended to
rollover this amount into an individual retirement account (IRA). His deadline to roll over
Amount 1 into an eligible retirement plan was December 27, 2010. During the period
from the move in August until a settlement was reached with the moving company in
early February, 2011, Taxpayer A indicates he spent several months making numerous
telephone calls and writing letters in his attempt to locate the missing items. Taxpayer A
maintains that his preoccupation with the missing items and the Christmas holiday
period caused him to forget the rollover deadline.
On December 31, 2010, 4 days beyond the rollover deadline, Taxpayer A went to a local
branch of Financial Institution D to complete the rollover of Amount 1 into an IRA.
However, it was closed for the New Year's Holiday. When he returned on January 3,
2011, Taxpayer A completed an application to open a rollover IRA (IRA E) with Financial
Institution D and transferred Amount 1 into this newly opened account. Shortly
thereafter, when he met with his tax return preparer, Taxpayer A was informed he
missed his rollover deadline.
Based on the above facts and representations, you request that the Internal
Revenue Service ("Service") waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in
section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code with respect to Amount 1.
Section 402(c) of the Code provides that if any portion of the balance to the credit
of an employee in a qualified trust is paid to the employee in an eligible rollover
distribution, and the distributee transfers any portion of the property received in
such distribution to an eligible retirement plan, and in the case of a distribution of
property other than money, the amount so transferred consists of the property
distributed, then such distribution (to the extent transferred) shall not be includible
in gross income for the taxable year in which paid. Section 402(c)(3)(A) of the
Code states that such rollover must be accomplished within 60 days following the
day on which the distributee received the property. An individual retirement
account (IRA) constitutes one form of eligible retirement plan.
Section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code provides, in relevant part, that the Secretary may
waive the 60-day requirement under section 402(c) of the Code where the failure
to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience,
including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the
individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after
December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 402(c)(3)(B) of the
Code.
201222051
Page 3
Section 402(d)(6) of the Code provides that any amount transferred in a direct
trustee-to-trustee transfer in accordance with section 401(a)(31) shall not be
includible in gross income for the taxable year of such transfer.
Section 1.401(a)(31) of the Income Tax Regulations, Question and Answer-15,
provides, in relevant part, that an eligible rollover distribution that is paid to an
eligible retirement plan in a direct rollover is a distribution and rollover, and not a
transfer of assets and liabilities.
Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining
whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section
408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances,
including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a
rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a
foreign country or postal error; (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in
the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time
elapsed since the distribution occurred.
Taxpayer A has not presented any evidence to the Service as to how any of the
factors outlined in Rev. Proc. 2003-16 affected his ability to rollover Amount 1 on a
timely basis. Taxpayer A stated that the ordeal of losing many of his personal
belongings during his move from New Orleans, Louisiana to Portsmouth, Virginia and
the subsequent time and energy spent attempting to recover them interfered with
Taxpayer A's management of his financial affairs. However, Taxpayer A had over two
months to deal with this problem prior to taking the distribution of Amount 1 from Plan
B. The loss of his possessions did not affect his ability to take a distribution.
Therefore, it did not constitute an event beyond his reasonable control. The
information presented indicates that the failure to rollover Amount 1 into an IRA
within the 60-day rollover period was, at all times, within the reasonable control of
Taxpayer A.
Under the circumstances presented in this case, the Service hereby declines to
waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1
from Plan B and thus Amount 1 will not be considered a valid rollover contribution
within the meaning of section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, because the 60-day
rollover requirement was not satisfied.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may
be applicable thereto.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
201222051
Page 4
A copy of this letter ruling has been sent to your authorized representative pursuant to
a power of attorney on file in this office. If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please
contact [illegible] (I.D. # [illegible]), [illegible], at ([illegible]).
Sincerely yours,
[illegible signature]
Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.