CCA explains when Appeals may address a future-year item in a closing agreement

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice addressed whether Appeals may enter a closing agreement covering a specific item in a future taxable year while that year is under examination. The advice explained that a future-year agreement may cover one or more separate items affecting the tax liability, but not the entire liability for that future year. Appeals authority is narrower for future years and generally concerns related specific items, such as a recurring issue whose treatment will not depend on later facts. The advice also emphasized coordination with Examination and other offices when the determination may affect another year or related case.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: May Appeals enter a closing agreement covering a specific item in a future year that is under examination?
• Outcome: Advice given
• Key authorities: IRC § 7121; Treas. Reg. § 301.7121-1(b)(3); Rev. Proc. 68-16; IRM 1.2.47.4, 8.2.3.2, 8.2.3.7.1, 8.13.1.1.2, 8.13.1.1.4, and 8.13.1.3.5

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2012042310245826 Number: 201222038
Release Date: 6/1/2012
Office: --------------
UILC: 9999.98-00, 7121.00-00

From: -----------------
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 10:24:59 AM
To: ---------------------
Cc:
Subject: Appeals authority
Re: Appeals authority to enter a closing agreement covering an item in a year other than under appeal (a
“future year”) even though that future year is currently under examination.

Hi ---------SPR § 601.106(g) addresses the limitations on the jurisdiction and function of Appeals and
¶(g)(3) covers Appeals jurisdiction with respect to closing agreements, but the SPR doesn’t get into
specifics. For specifics, I'd look at the Appeals IRMs. Several have procedures for coordinating with
Exam which would allow Exam to raise specific concerns; i.e., a future year item really isn't related to an
item in the year before Appeals (e.g., it’s not a recurring item), or the proper treatment of the item in the
future year depends on facts and circumstances that will arise in that future year. Here are some
references -

A closing agreement may be entered for a period ending after the date of the agreement with respect to
one or more separate items or transactions (i.e., it can’t be for the entire liability for the future year. See
Treas. Reg. 301.7121-1(b)(3) (“agreement may relate to one or more separate items affecting the tax
liability”). The authority delegated to Appeals for these years is more narrowly set out as covering
“related specific items affecting other taxable periods.” See IRM 1.2.47.4 (08-18-1997) Delegation Order
8-3 (formerly DO-97, Rev. 34) at ¶(14). This delegation reflected in the Appeals closing agreement
handbook at IRM 8.13.1.1.4.(4) which sets out (two) general limitations on Appeals authority. And the
delegation is reflected in an example that allows for consideration of future years “when an issue is
disposed of on an intermediate basis and the issue is recurring (providing later tax treatment will not
depend on factual circumstances of later years).” See IRM 8.13.1.1.2(m). Guidelines for closing
agreements are in Rev. Proc. 68-16 and the preceding parenthetical is reflected therein at §7. 03, Matters
Not Properly Determinable, which provides “Determinations should not attempt to fix tax treatment for
future years where correct treatment will depend primarily on circumstances that will arise subsequent to
the agreement, such as the application of capital gains treatment to future sales of real estate or the
treatment of farm losses for future years.” If you want to discuss whether a particular item can be covered
in a future year's closing agreement, let me know and I'll put you in touch with someone in --------.

The need for coordination on future years is mentioned in Rev. Proc. 68-16 at § 7.05, Related Cases and
Years, which cautions that “The direct or indirect impact of the determination of a specific matter upon
other years or related cases particularly those within the jurisdiction of another office, should be given
careful consideration” and that coordination may be necessary. Consistent with § 7.05, the Appeals
closing agreement provides for coordination where a determination on a specific matter may have a direct
or indirect impact on other years or related cases that are under another office’s jurisdiction. IRM
8.13.1.3.5 at (1)&(2). Another Appeals IRM details coordination procedures for “related cases” (i.e., those
involving a common or similar issue such as different years of the same taxpayer received at different
times). IRM 8.2.3.2 at (1). See IRM 8.2.3.7.1 regarding future years that are under exam but for which
an RAR has not been issued.