CCA explains levy and withholding rules for an ESOP distribution

Number
201222035
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Levy and Distraint
Code sections
§ 404, § 3405, § 6321, § 6331
Ruling dated
January 13, 2012
Publicly released
June 1, 2012

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice addressed an IRS levy against a taxpayer's interest in an employee stock ownership plan. Dividends distributed from the ESOP under IRC § 404(k) are not subject to withholding under IRC § 3405. For an eligible rollover distribution that is ordinarily subject to withholding, the ESOP must withhold 20 percent, while the levy attaches to the taxpayer's interest up to the amount of the stated tax liability. The advice treated the levy and withholding requirements as independent and said the administrator should distribute 1.25 times the levy amount so that the withheld 20 percent leaves the amount needed to satisfy the levy.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How should an ESOP administrator apply an IRS levy and mandatory withholding to a taxpayer's distribution?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 404(k), 3405(c), 6321, and 6331(a); Announcement 2008-56

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-113121-12 Number: 201222035
Release Date: 6/1/2012
Office: -------------------------
UILC: 3405.00-00, 6331.00-00

From: ---------------------
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 11:40 AM
To: ------------------
Cc: ------------------
Subject: Levy against an ESOP

This email is in response to your questions regarding a tax levy against a taxpayer’s interest in an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP). First, you ask whether distributions of dividends from the ESOP are subject to withholding. Plan distributions that are § 404(k) dividends are not subject to withholding under § 3405. See Announcement 2008-56, 2008-26 I.R.B. 1192. With respect to distributions from the ESOP that are ordinarily subject to withholding, you ask how the withholding rules operate when a distribution is made to honor an IRS tax levy. Section § 6331(a) gives the Secretary permission to collect tax by levy upon all property and property rights belonging to the person who owes the tax. In the case you have asked about, the section 6321 assessment lien encumbers the taxpayer’s entire interest in the ESOP account, not just to the amount of tax owed. The levy, in turn, attaches to the account up to the amount necessary to satisfy the stated tax liability that the Service is seeking to collect. Additionally, section 3405(c) requires the payor of an eligible rollover distribution (that is not directly rolled over to another eligible retirement account) to withhold 20% of the distribution. Sections 6331 and 3405(c) are independent requirements that must both be satisfied. This case does not present the question of what to do if the taxpayer's right to a distribution is not great enough to satisfy both requirements. However, in advice that may not be used as precedent, we have previously stated that in the event of a conflict, the withholding requirement of 3405(c) would take priority. See 1997 WL 34649639, www.irs.gov/pub/lanoa/pmta00177_6974.pdf In this case, the levy attached to the taxpayer’s entire interest in the ESOP, and is capped only by the amount listed as the tax liability on the levy. In order to satisfy the levy, the plan administrator should make a large enough distribution to both satisfy the amount of the levy and to withhold 20%. Mathematically, the amount that the plan administrator should withdraw works out to be 1.25 times the amount of the levy (1.25 is the inverse of .8). This will allow the administrator to remit 20% of the withdrawn amount as withholding and the remaining 80% of the withdrawn amount will equal the tax liability listed in the levy. Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------
-------------------------
--------------------------
----------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace