PLR 1222019: IRS grants more time for two taxpayers to defer Canadian RRSP income
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS granted a married couple 60 days to make elections under Rev. Proc. 2002-23 to defer U.S. income tax on income accruing in their Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans. The couple had not known that the elections and Form 8891 reporting were required, and they had not received distributions from the plans. They must amend the specified returns and attach Form 8891 for each relevant plan, then continue attaching the form until the year of final distribution. The ruling grants more time but does not decide whether the taxpayers are otherwise eligible to make the elections.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the taxpayers make late elections to defer U.S. tax on income accruing in their Canadian RRSPs?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-23; U.S.-Canada Income Tax Convention, Article XVIII(7)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201222019 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/1/2012 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 9114.03-06 ----------------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
------------------------------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
---------------------------- CC:INTL:B01
------------------------------ PLR-137255-11
Date:
March 01, 2012
TY: --------------
Legend
Taxpayer = --------------------
------------------------
Spouse = ----------------------------
------------------------
RRSP 1 = -----------------------------------
------------------------------------
RRSP 2 = ---------------------------
-----------------------
RRSP 3 = ------------------------------
------------------------
RRSP 4 = --------------------------
--------------------
Accounting Firm = ------------------------
Tax Years = ---------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Year 4 = -------
PLR-137255-11 2
Year 5 = -------
Year 6 = -------
Year 7 = -------
Year 8 = -------
Dear --------------------------------------:
This is in reply to a letter dated August 29, 2011, as amended by supplemental
information dated February 20, 2012, requesting an extension of time under Treas. Reg.
§ 301.9100-3 for Taxpayer and Spouse to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-23,
2002-1 C.B. 744, for Tax Years.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayers and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by the appropriate parties. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the requested rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth
below.
FACTS
Taxpayer and Spouse each established Canadian Registered Retirement Savings
Plans (RRSPs) before becoming U.S. residents in Year 1 and Year 2 respectively.
Taxpayer established RRSP 1, RRSP 2, and RRSP 3, and Spouse established RRSP
- In Year 3, RRSP 2 was closed and the entire account balanced was rolled over into
new RRSP 3. Since becoming U.S. residents, Taxpayer and Spouse have prepared
their own federal income tax returns. They believed their tax filing situation was very
simple. They did not receive tax advice and/or counsel from an accounting firm prior to
Year 7 with respect to their RRSP accounts, as they believed they had prepared their
income tax returns correctly and that the RRSP accounts required no additional
reporting.
In Year 7, after hearing something in the media about foreign financial account
reporting, Spouse called the Internal Revenue Service to confirm that she and Taxpayer
had been properly reporting their Canadian RRSP accounts. During that discussion,
Spouse was advised by an IRS representative that Form 8891 (U.S. Information Return
for Beneficiaries of Certain Canadian Registered Retirement Plans) must be filed in
order to defer U.S. income taxation on income accruing in, but not distributed from, an
RRSP. At that point, Taxpayer and Spouse amended their Form 1040 returns for Year
4, Year 5, and Year 6 to include Forms 8891 for each of those years.
PLR-137255-11 3
Shortly thereafter, Spouse contacted Accounting Firm because of her concerns
regarding the correctness of the amended returns, and to make certain that she and
Taxpayer were in full compliance with U.S. tax law. Accounting Firm then confirmed
what the IRS representative had told her regarding the need to make an election to
defer U.S. taxation on income accruing in their RRSP accounts pursuant to Article
XVIII(7) of the United States-Canada Income Tax Convention (“the Treaty”) and Rev.
Proc. 2002-23, and Taxpayer and Spouse took immediate action to request an
extension of time to file a late election.
As of Year 8, Taxpayer and Spouse have not received any distributions from their
RRSPs. Taxpayer and Spouse represent that the Internal Revenue Service has not
corresponded with them regarding their RRSPs.
RULING REQUESTED
Taxpayer and Spouse request the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue
Service for an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make an election
pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2002-23, to defer U.S. federal income taxation on income
accrued in their RRSPs, as provided for in Article XVIII(7) of the Treaty for Tax Years .
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief
in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is
prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will
be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that
the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice
the interests of the Government.
PLR-137255-11 4
In the present situation, the election provided in Rev. Proc. 2002-23 is a regulatory
election within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the
Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100–1(c) to grant
Taxpayer and Spouse an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer and Spouse satisfy
the standards set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).
Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that
Taxpayer and Spouse satisfy the standards of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. Accordingly,
Taxpayer and Spouse are granted an extension of time until 60 days from the date of
this ruling letter to make elections for Tax Years under Rev. Proc. 2002-23. As provided
in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a), the granting of an extension of time is not a
determination that Taxpayer and Spouse are otherwise eligible to make the above-
described election.
Pursuant to section 4.07 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, the election, once made, cannot be
revoked except with the consent of the Commissioner. For Tax Years, Taxpayer and
Spouse must file amended U.S. income tax returns to which they attach Form 8891
(U.S. Information Return for Beneficiaries of Certain Canadian Registered Retirement
Plans) for each RRSP. For each subsequent tax year through the tax year in which a
final distribution is made from each RRSP, Taxpayer and Spouse must attach a Form
8891 for each RRSP from which a final distribution has not been made to their U.S.
income tax return.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.
A copy of this letter must be attached to Taxpayer and Spouse’s U.S. income tax return
for the year in which Taxpayer and Spouse obtained the ruling and should be
associated with Taxpayer and Spouse’s amended returns for Tax Years.
This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will be sent to
your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
M. Grace Fleeman
Senior Technical Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of Chief Counsel (International))
Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.