PLR 201222003: IRS restores S corporation status after inadvertent termination
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS determined that a corporation’s S corporation election terminated after it had accumulated earnings and profits and more than 25 percent of its gross receipts were passive investment income for three consecutive taxable years. The IRS also found that the termination was inadvertent because the corporation intended to remain an S corporation and had consistently reported itself that way. The corporation may continue to be treated as an S corporation if it distributes its accumulated earnings and profits pro rata to its shareholders by the required date and the shareholders report the distributions as dividends. The ruling did not address the corporation’s eligibility to be an S corporation apart from the inadvertent termination relief.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the corporation receive relief from the inadvertent termination of its S corporation election?
- Outcome: Approved, S corporation status restored subject to stated conditions.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361, 1362(d)(3), 1362(f), and 1375; Treas. Reg. § 1.1362-4
Full text (IRS public release)
- Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201222003
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/1/2012
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 1362.04-00, 1362.02-03
--------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
-------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
----------------------------
CC:PSI:B02
---------------------
PLR-104829-12
-----------------------
Date:
February 08, 2012
Legend
X = ----------------------------
State = --------
D1 = -----------------------
D2 = ----------------------
D3 = ----------------------
D4 = -------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Dear ----------------:
This responds to a letter dated January 31, 2012 submitted on behalf of X by X's authorized representative, requesting inadvertent termination relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).
According to the information submitted and representations within, X was incorporated on D1, under the laws of State. Effective D2, X elected to be taxed as an S corporation.
PLR-104829-12
2
For X's Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3 taxable years, and for the subsequent years to date, X's passive investment income exceeded 25% of its gross receipts. Furthermore, X had accumulated earnings and profits (AE&P) for each of the years stated above. As a result, X's S election terminated on D3.
X represents that it has always intended to maintain its S corporation status and that the termination of X's S election was inadvertent and did not involve retroactive tax planning or tax avoidance. X further represents that X and its shareholders continued to consistently treat X as an S corporation and that X and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments required as a condition of obtaining relief under the inadvertent termination rule of § 1362(f) of the Code that may be required by the Secretary.
Section 1361(a)(1) of the Code provides that the term "S corporation" means, with respect to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under
§ 1362(a) is in effect for such year.
Section 1362(d)(3)(A)(i) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated whenever the corporation (I) has accumulated earnings and profits at the close of each of 3 consecutive taxable years, and (II) has gross receipts for each of such taxable years more than 25 percent of which are passive investment income.
Section 1362(d)(3)(C)(i) provides that except as otherwise provided in § 1362(d)(3)(C), the term "passive investment income" means gross receipts derived from royalties, rents, dividends, interest, and annuities.
Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b); (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent; (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the termination occurred is a small business corporation; and (4) the corporation for which the termination occurred, and each person who was a shareholder in such corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make the adjustments (consistent with the treatment of such corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination, such corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.
Section 1.1362-4(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in relevant part, that the determination of whether a termination was inadvertent is made by the Commissioner. The corporation has the burden of establishing that under the relevant facts and circumstances the Commissioner should determine that the termination was
PLR-104829-12
3
inadvertent. The fact that the terminating event was not reasonably within the control of the corporation and, in the case of a termination, was not part of a plan to terminate the election, or the fact that the terminating event or circumstance took place without the knowledge of the corporation, notwithstanding its due diligence to safeguard itself against such an event or circumstance, tends to establish that the termination of the election was inadvertent.
Section 1.1362-4(d) provides that the Commissioner may require any adjustments that are appropriate. In general, the adjustments required should be consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation during the period specified by the Commissioner.
Section 1375 imposes a tax on the income of an S corporation that has accumulated earnings and profits at the close of a taxable year, and that has gross receipts more than 25% of which are passive investment income (within the meaning of § 1362(d)(3)).
Section 1375(b)(1)(B) provides that the amount of the excess net passive income for any taxable year shall not exceed the amount of the corporation's taxable income for such taxable year as determined under § 63(a) -- (i) without regard to the deductions allowed by part VIII of subchapter B (other than the deduction allowed by § 248, relating to organizational expenditures), and (ii) without regard to the deduction under § 172.
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that X's S corporation election terminated on D3, the first day of the first taxable year after three consecutive years in which X had accumulated earnings and profits, and in which more than 25 percent of its income was passive investment income under § 1362(d)(3)(A). We further conclude that the termination of X's S election on D3 was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation beginning on and after D3, unless X's S corporation election is otherwise terminated under § 1362(d), and provided that X distributes its AE&P pro rata to its shareholders by D4 and the shareholders report their pro-rata shares of this distribution as a dividend on their federal tax returns.
Except as specifically ruled upon above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding X's eligibility to be an S corporation.
PLR-104829-12
4
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. According to § 6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent. Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Bradford R. Poston
Senior Counsel, Branch 2
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace