CCA 201221015: Chief Counsel says a disregarded entity is not a partnership partner
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel Advice addressed whether a partnership existed for federal tax purposes. The advice concluded that a redacted entity was disregarded as separate from its owner and therefore was not considered a partner. Because there was only one owner for federal tax purposes, the advice concluded that there was no partnership. The advice applied the entity-classification rule in IRC § 7701.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the identified entities constitute a partnership for federal tax purposes?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: IRC § 7701
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2012030712424338 Number: 201221015
Release Date: 5/25/2012
Office: ----------
UILC: 7701.02-00
From: ----------------
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:43:18 PM
To: -------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: Advice requested; short statute
-------
Your instincts are correct. There is no partnership. ----- is disregarded as separate
from ---- and thus isn't considered a partner for federal tax purposes. The only owner
for federal tax purposes is ----. One owner, no partnership.
Let me know if you need anything else.
------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace