PLR 201220041: IRS denies an automatic amortization extension

Number
201220041
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Standards for Multiemployer Plans
Code sections
§ 431, § 6110
Ruling dated
August 2, 2010
Publicly released
May 18, 2012

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS denied a plan's request for an automatic extension to amortize unfunded liabilities. The requested extension would have applied to the plan year beginning April 1, 2009. The IRS found that the plan's funding improvement plan was not adopted during the plan year, so the requirement in IRC § 431(d)(1)(A)(ii) was not met. The IRS stated that the period for adopting the funding improvement plan had passed and it could not provide a favorable ruling.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the plan receive an automatic amortization extension under IRC § 431(d)?
  • Outcome: Denied
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 431(d), 431(d)(1)(A), 431(d)(1)(A)(ii), and 431(d)(1)(B)

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index Number 0431.00-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

AUG 02 2010
201220041

SEE: T: EP: RA: A2

Re:

Dear

This letter is to inform you of an adverse decision regarding your request for an automatic amortization extension as permitted in section 431(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). This extension would have been effective for the plan year beginning April 1, 2009. The adverse decision is due to the fact that the funding improvement plan was not adopted during the plan year.

Section 431(d)(1)(A) of the Code requires the Secretary to extend the period of time required to amortize any unfunded liability of a plan for a period of time (not in excess of 5 years) if the Plan submits an application meeting the criteria stated in section 431(d)(1)(B). The plan must submit the required information to meet the criteria in section 431(d)(1)(B), including a certification from the plan's actuary that, in part:

(ii) the plan sponsor has adopted a plan to improve the
plan's funding status,

The actuarial certification provided indicated that:

“The plan sponsor has devised a plan to improve the plan’s funding status. Under WRERA, the plan sponsor froze the Plan's status on April 1, 2009. Once the Plan’s status is certified as of April 1, 2010, the Plan sponsor will devise a plan to improve the plan’s funding status.”

[illegible] of the IRS spoke with the plan's actuary, [illegible], on April [illegible], 20[illegible], to clarify whether a plan to improve the funding status was devised for the plan year beginning April [illegible], 20[illegible]. [illegible] confirmed that [illegible] had not occurred. During the June 24, 2010, Conference of Right, [illegible] indicated that Board

201220041

minutes for the January 20, 2010, meeting may indicate that a funding improvement plan was adopted by March [illegible], 20[illegible]. A review of those minutes did not indicate that such plan was adopted. Therefore, section 431(d)(1)(A)(ii) has not been met. Given that the time period for adopting a funding improvement plan for the year ended March [illegible], 20[illegible], has passed, we cannot provide a favorable ruling for an extension.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling is being sent to your authorized representative.

If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact.

Sincerely yours,

[signature]

David M. Ziegler, Manager
EP Actuarial Group 2

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace