Private Letter Ruling 1220014 Released May 18, 2012 Approved

PLR 1220014: Taxpayer receives more time to elect RRSP income deferral

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a U.S. citizen more time to elect deferral of U.S. income tax on earnings in a Canadian registered retirement savings plan. The taxpayer had relied on tax preparers who did not advise the taxpayer to make the treaty election or file Form 8891. The IRS found that the taxpayer satisfied the reasonable-cause and good-faith standards for late-election relief under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. The taxpayer received 60 days from the ruling date to make the election, subject to otherwise being eligible, and was required to file amended returns and Forms 8891 for the specified years.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a taxpayer receive more time to elect treaty-based deferral of U.S. tax on earnings in a Canadian RRSP?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-23; U.S.-Canada Income Tax Treaty

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201220014 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/18/2012 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 9114.03-06 -----------------------------, ID No. --------------
-----------------
Telephone Number:


                                                      ---------------------

------------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------------------- CC:INTL:B01
PLR-136341-11
Date:
February 23, 2012

TY: ---------------

Legend

Taxpayer = ---------------------
------------------------

Financial Institution = --------------------------

RRSP = --------------------------
----------------------------

Tax Years = ---------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Year 3 = -------

Year 4 = -------

Year 5 = -------

Date A = ----------------------

Tax Preparer 1 = ----------------------------------------------------

Tax Preparer 2 = --------------------------------------

Tax Preparer 3 = ----------------
PLR-136341-11 2

Dear ---------------

This is in reply to a letter dated Date A requesting an extension of time under Treas.
Reg. § 301.9100-3 for Taxpayer to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, 2002-1
C.B. 744, for Tax Years.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the requested rulings, it is subject to verification on examination. The
information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

FACTS

Taxpayer is, and always has been, a U.S. citizen. In Year 1, Taxpayer moved from the
United States to Canada to seek employment. Taxpayer lived and worked in Canada
until Year 3, when he moved back to the United States.

Taxpayer established a Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) with
Financial Institution while he was employed and living in Canada; taxpayer made annual
contributions to the RRSP during this period. After moving back to the United States in
Year 3, Taxpayer ceased making annual contributions to the RRSP, although Taxpayer
continued to maintain the RRSP with Financial Institution. At all times relevant to this
ruling request, Taxpayer deferred recognition of the accrued earnings in the RRSP for
U.S. income tax purposes. Taxpayer has never withdrawn any funds nor received any
distributions from the RRSP.

Taxpayer hired Tax Preparer 3, a U.S. accounting firm, to prepare his U.S. income tax
returns commencing with Taxpayer’s Year 5 income tax return. During its review of
Taxpayer’s U.S. income tax filings for the years preceding Year 5, Tax Preparer 3
discovered that Form 8891, “U.S. Information Return for Beneficiaries of Certain
Registered Retirement Plans,” was not present with any of Taxpayer’s tax filings for
these years. During this review, Tax Preparer 3 also discovered that, for the years prior
to the year that Form 8891 was created by the Internal Revenue Service, Taxpayer’s
tax filings did not include a statement that Taxpayer was electing to defer current U.S.
income taxation on earnings in the RRSP pursuant to Article XVIII(7) or Article XXIX(5)
of the U.S.-Canada Income Tax Treaty (Treaty).

Taxpayer relied upon Tax Preparer 1, a firm of Canadian chartered accountants, to
prepare his Canadian and U.S. income tax returns for Year 1 through Year 2. Following
his return to the United States, Taxpayer hired Tax Preparer 2, a U.S. accounting firm,
to prepare his U.S. income tax returns for Year 3 through Year 4. Neither Tax Preparer
1 nor Tax Preparer 2 informed Taxpayer that he should elect to defer current U.S.
PLR-136341-11 3

income taxation on earnings in the RRSP pursuant to the Treaty. Tax Preparer 2 also
did not advise Taxpayer to file Form 8891.

Taxpayer only became aware of Form 8891 and the Treaty election to defer current
U.S. income taxation on the earnings of the RRSP following his hiring of Return
Preparer 3. Taxpayer states that the Internal Revenue Service has not communicated
with him concerning the RRSP or the lack of an election made on a statement attached
to Taxpayer’s prior returns or on Form 8891.

RULING REQUESTED

Taxpayer requests the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service for
an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make an election pursuant to
Rev. Proc. 2002-23, to defer U.S. federal income taxation on income accrued in his
RRSP, as provided for in Article XVIII(7) of the Treaty for Tax Years.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief
in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is
prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will
be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that
the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice
the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the election provided in Rev. Proc. 2002-23 is a regulatory
election within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the
Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100–1(c) to grant
Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the standards set forth
in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).

Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that
Taxpayer satisfies the standards of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. Accordingly, Taxpayer is
granted an extension of time until 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to make an
election for Tax Years under Rev. Proc. 2002-23. As provided in Treas. Reg. §
PLR-136341-11 4

301.9100-1(a), the granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer
is otherwise eligible to make the above-described election.

Pursuant to section 4.07 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, the election once made cannot be
revoked except with the consent of the Commissioner. For Tax Years, Taxpayer must
file amended U.S. income tax returns to which he attaches Forms 8891 (U.S.
Information Return for Beneficiaries of Certain Canadian Registered Retirement Plans)
for RRSP. For each subsequent tax year through the tax year in which a final
distribution is made from RRSP, Taxpayer must attach a Form 8891 for RRSP to his
U.S. income tax return.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

A copy of this letter must be attached to Taxpayer's U.S. income tax return for the year
in which Taxpayer obtained the ruling and should be associated with Taxpayer’s
amended returns for Tax Years.

This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will be sent to
your authorized representatives.

                                Sincerely,




                                Craig R. Gilbert
                                Special Counsel to the Deputy Associate Chief
                                  Counsel (International Field Service and Litigation)
                                Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International)

Enclosure:
Copy for 6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.