Private Letter Ruling 1219031 Released May 11, 2012 Approved Transcribed from scan

PLR 1219031: IRS approves a regulated electricity market counterparty structure

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered an independent system operator's plan to become the central counterparty for transactions in its regulated wholesale electricity markets. The operator would take title to the electricity and related products, match the prices paid to producers with the prices received from purchasers, and use the structure to reduce the effects of a participant's bankruptcy. The IRS ruled that the change would not adversely affect the organization's status as a social-welfare organization under IRC § 501(c)(4). It also ruled that the related revenues would not be income from an unrelated trade or business under § 513(a).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would a regulated electricity market operator's central-counterparty structure affect its § 501(c)(4) status or create unrelated business income?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(c)(4), 511, 512, 513, and 6110(k)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(c)(4)-1 and 1.513-1; Rev. Ruls. 66-148 and 74-361

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Release Number: 201219031 Employer Identification Number:
Release Date: 5/11/2012
Date: February 14, 2012 Person to Contact and ID Number:
UIL:
501.04-00 Contact Telephone Number:
513.00-00
FAX Number:

Dear

This is in response to your request dated August 1, 2011, for rulings as to whether your
establishment of a central counterparty structure pursuant to which you will become the central
counterparty to transactions that take place in the markets you administer will affect your status
as an organization described in section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) or
will give rise to income from an unrelated trade or business within the meaning of section
513(a).

Facts

You are recognized as an organization exempt from Federal income tax under section 501(c)(4)
of the Code. You are operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare.

You were formed as an independent system operator (“ISO”) for a geographic region in a
particular state. As such, you are certified by the state public utility commission (the “state
PUC”) and required by state law to perform the following functions: (i) ensure non-
discriminatory access to the transmission and distribution systems for all electricity buyers and
sellers; (ii) ensure the reliability and adequacy of the regional electric network; (iii) ensure that
information related to customer retail choice is provided in a timely manner; and (iv) ensure that
electricity production and delivery are accurately accounted for among all regional generators
and wholesale buyers and sellers in the area. The state PUC exercises control over your
organization by, for example, approving your budget, any changes to your operating documents,
your operations plan, and your specific operational protocols (“Protocols”).

Collectively, your activities are designed to ensure that the electricity consuming public has the
amount of cost effective electricity they need to operate their homes and businesses. In
furtherance of these activities, you administer markets for the wholesale purchase and sale of
electric energy and related products and services which serve the state. In order to cover your
operating expenses, you collect fees from the producers and wholesale purchasers of electric
power in your region. These fees as well as the rules and procedures for the electricity markets
you administer are set forth in substantive rules promulgated by the state PUC and your state
PUC-approved Protocols. The contracts, agreements or transactions offered under the state
rules and your state PUC-approved Protocols are for the purchase and sale of electric energy
and related products and services, including related financial transactions which do not involve
physical delivery of electricity.

The transactions you administer are not structured as direct bilateral contracts, i.e., individual
purchase and sale contracts between a particular seller and a particular purchaser. Rather, you
administer central markets for the benefit of market participants. Each market participant has
established a settlement account with you, and you settle the various positions of the market
participants on an aggregate basis. While you act as the administrator of the markets, clearing
and settling purchases and sales by market participants, you do not take title to the electric
energy and related products and services purchased and sold in the markets.

You are concerned about your ability, in the event of the bankruptcy of a market participant, to
set off or net the market positions of the bankrupt market participant. Your concern is that you
might not satisfy the “mutuality” requirement for setoff when those obligations are based upon
different purchase and sale transactions because there is no single identifiable counterparty
with whom the bankrupt market participant stands in privity of contract. When the costs
attributable to the bankruptcy of a market participant cannot be collected from that participant
they must be borne by all the market participants. This creates pricing inefficiencies that may
ultimately be passed on to the rate-paying general public in your geographic region.

To address this concern, you intend to pursue Protocol amendments proposing to establish
yourself as the central counterparty to all transactions in the markets you administer.
Specifically, you will take title to the electric energy and related products and services
purchased and sold in the markets, establishing privity between you and market participants.
However, your role as central counterparty will not affect the clearing price, because the prices
you pay to producers will exactly match the prices you receive from the wholesale purchasers.
All transactions in which you will engage will be pursuant to state PUC-approved Protocols and
the state rules.

You have represented that your activities as the central counterparty to transactions in the
markets you administer (1) will not require an amendment to any of your organizing documents
or any change to your organization; (2) will require only minor revisions to your Protocols; (3)
will result in no net profit or loss to you; and (4) will not affect market clearing prices for
electric energy and related products and services in the wholesale electric markets you
administer.

You have determined that amending your state PUC-approved Protocols such that you will
become the central counterparty to transactions in the markets you administer will protect the
interests of both the wholesale electricity markets you administer and the rate-paying general
public in the state. The Protocol amendments establishing you as central counterparty will be
filed with your state PUC and will go into effect only if approved by the state PUC.

Rulings Requested

  1. Your establishment and implementation of a central counterparty structure
    pursuant to which you will become the central counterparty to transactions
    consummated through the markets you administer will not adversely affect
    your status as an organization exempt from Federal income tax under
    section 501(c)(4) of the Code.

  2. The revenues you receive by virtue of being the central counterparty to
    transactions consummated through the markets you administer will not be

classified as income from an unrelated trade or business within the meaning
of section 513(a).

Law

Section 501(a) of the Code provides for the exemption from federal income tax of organizations
described in section 501(c)(4) of the Code.

Section 501(c)(4)(A) of the Code describes civic leagues or organizations not organized for
profit but operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare.

Section 501(c)(4)(B) of the Code provides that an organization shall not be described in section
501(c)(4)(A) of the Code if any part of the net earnings of such entity inures to the benefit of any
private shareholder or individual.

Section 511(a) of the Code imposes a tax on the unrelated business taxable income of
organizations described in section 501(c)(4).

Section 512(a) of the Code states that the term “unrelated business taxable income” means the
gross income derived by any organization from any unrelated trade or business (as defined in
section 513) regularly carried on by it, less the applicable deductions, and computed with the
modifications in section 512(b).

Section 513(a) of the Code provides that the term “unrelated trade or business” means, in the
case of any organization subject to the tax imposed by section 511, any trade or business the
conduct of which is not substantially related (aside from the need of such organization for
income or funds or the use it makes of the profits derived) to the exercise or performance by
such organization of the purpose or function constituting the basis for its exemption under
section 501.

Section 1.501(c)(4)-1(a)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations (“Regulations”) provides that an
organization may be exempt as an organization described in section 501(c)(4) if it is not
organized or operated for profit; and it is operated exclusively for the promotion of social
welfare.

Section 1.501(c)(4)-1(a)(2)(ii) of the Regulations provides, in relevant part, that an organization is
not operated primarily for the promotion of social welfare if its primary activity is carrying on a
business with the general public in a manner similar to organizations which are operated for
profit.

Section 1.513-1(d)(1) of the Regulations provides that gross income derives from “unrelated
trade or business” within the meaning of section 513(a) of the Code if the conduct of the trade
or business which produces the income is not substantially related (other than through the
production of funds) to the purposes for which exemption is granted.

Section 1.513-1(d)(2) of the Regulations provides that a trade or business is “related” to exempt
purposes only where the conduct of the business activities has causal relationship to the
achievement of exempt purposes (other than through the production of income). A trade or
business is “substantially related” only if the causal relationship is a substantial one. Thus, for

the conduct of trade or business from which a particular amount of gross income is derived to
be substantially related to purposes for which exemption is granted, the production or
distribution of the goods or the performance of the services from which the gross income is
derived must contribute importantly to the accomplishment of those purposes.

Rev. Rul. 66-148, 1966-1 C.B. 143, states that an organization formed for the purpose of
establishing and maintaining a system for storage and distribution of water in order to increase
underground water levels of a community is described in section 501(c)(4) as an organization
operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare. The organization's activities benefited
all residents of the community whose wells were supplied by the raised water table. The
organization was funded through assessments on water users in the community.

Rev. Rul. 74-361, 1974-2 C.B. 159, states that an organization that provides fire and rescue
services for the general community qualified as a section 501(c)(3) organization because it
lessened the burdens of government. The ruling also states that the organization also could
have qualified as a section 501(c)(4) organization because it promoted social welfare.

Ruling 1

You promote the common good and general welfare of the community as a whole by promoting
the reliable and efficient operations of electric power systems in your geographic region,
ensuring open access for all users of the region's transmission and distribution system on a
non-discriminatory basis, coordinating these activities within the region, and performing the
functions of an independent system operator within your state. The state has a significant voice
in determining your activities and a continuing oversight role. Your authorizing state agency has
delegated responsibility to you to develop rules to implement these activities.

Your establishment and implementation of a central counterparty structure pursuant to which
you will become the central counterparty to transactions in the markets you administer, is a
response to concern about your ability, in the event of the bankruptcy of a market participant, to
set off or net the market positions of the bankrupt market participant. This inability would result
in costs being borne by all market participants and the resulting pricing inefficiencies could
burden the rate-paying public in your region.

Your activities as the central counterparty to transactions in the markets you administer will not
require an amendment to any of your organizing documents or any change to your organization.
Additionally, your activities as the central counterparty will result in no net profit or loss to you.
Certain revisions to your state PUC-approved Protocols will be required for implementation of
the central counterparty structure, but these revisions must be approved by the state PUC.
Your role as a central counterparty will not affect the clearing price, because the prices you pay
to producers will exactly match the prices you receive from the wholesale purchasers. Thus,
your market processes will remain essentially the same.

By adopting the central counterparty structure, you seek to enhance the reliability and efficiency
of the power system in your state, for the benefit of the rate-paying public. A default by one or
more market participants can lead to a larger default in the market, disrupting services and the
flow of electricity. By acting as the central counterparty, you will be able to offset the obligations
of a defaulting participant against payments owed to that participant, reducing the impact of one

participant's default on the operations of other participants. The market participants are not able
to do this themselves because of the clearing price system you use and the lack of contract
privity with the defaulting party. Your sole purpose in acting as a central counterparty is to
reduce the burden of a default on other market participants and the corresponding pricing
inefficiencies that may be passed onto the rate-paying public. You will not generate any income
from the activity. Additionally, the state's oversight role will continue to ensure that you will be
operated in the manner for which you were established. Therefore, acting as a central
counterparty will contribute to the common good and general welfare of the community, similar
to the activities in Rev. Ruls. 66-148 and 74-361.

Accordingly, the implementation of the central counterparty structure, and your activities as the
central counterparty on each transaction in the markets you administer, will not adversely affect
your status as an exempt organization described in section 501(c)(4) of the Code as compared
to your previous operations.

Ruling 2

Section 513(a) of the Code defines the term “unrelated trade or business” as any trade or
business which is not substantially related to the performance of an organization's exempt
purpose. Section 1.513-1(d)(2) of the Regulations states that a trade or business is substantially
related to an organization's exempt purpose if it contributes importantly to the accomplishment
of that purpose. As stated above, by acting as a central counterparty you will reduce the
disruptions caused by a market participant's default and therefore the costs that must be borne
by all market participants. This contributes importantly to the accomplishment of your exempt
purposes of promoting the common good and general welfare of the community by reducing
pricing inefficiencies that may ultimately be borne by the rate-paying general public. Therefore,
acting as a central counterparty is substantially related to your exempt purpose and will not
constitute an “unrelated trade or business” within the meaning of section 513(a).

Rulings

  1. Your establishment and implementation of a central counterparty structure
    pursuant to which you will become the central counterparty to transactions
    consummated through the markets you administer will not adversely affect
    your status as an organization exempt from Federal income tax under
    section 501(c)(4) of the Code.

  2. The revenues you receive by virtue of being the central counterparty to
    transactions consummated through the markets you administer will not be
    classified as income from an unrelated trade or business within the meaning
    of section 513(a).

This ruling will be made available for public inspection under section 6110 of the Code after
certain deletions of identifying information are made. For details, see enclosed Notice 437,
Notice of Intention to Disclose. A copy of this ruling with deletions that we intend to make
available for public inspection is attached to Notice 437. If you disagree with our proposed
deletions, you should follow the instructions in Notice 437.

This ruling is directed only to the organization that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

This ruling is based on the facts as they were presented and on the understanding that there will
be no material changes in these facts. This ruling does not address the applicability of any
section of the Code or Regulations to the facts submitted other than with respect to the sections
described. Because it could help resolve questions concerning your Federal income tax status,
this ruling should be kept in your permanent records.

If you have any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney currently on file with the Service, we are sending a
copy of this letter to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Manager, Exempt Organizations
Guidance Group 2

Enclosure
Notice 437

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.