PLR 201217006: IRS restores S corporation treatment after late QSST elections
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporation's shares were held by two trusts that did not timely elect qualified subchapter S trust (QSST) treatment. The IRS concluded that the resulting termination of the corporation's S corporation election was inadvertent under section 1362(f). It allowed the corporation to continue being treated as an S corporation from the specified date, subject to the election having otherwise been valid and not terminated for another reason. The relief required the trustees to file valid QSST elections within 120 days and required consistent S corporation reporting.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the corporation continue as an S corporation after two shareholder trusts failed to make timely QSST elections?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361, 1362(a), 1362(b), 1362(d), 1362(f), and 6110.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201217006
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/27/2012
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00, 1362.00-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------ --------------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------------------- --------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-129434-11
Date: December 8, 2011
LEGEND
Company = -----------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
State = ----------
Trust1 = ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
Trust2 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
Date1 = -----------------
Date2 = ----------------------
Date3 = -----------------------------
Dear :
This letter responds to a letter dated July 6, 2011, submitted on behalf of Company by its authorized representative, and subsequent correspondence, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.
FACTS
Company is a State corporation that elected to be an S corporation as of Date1.
Trust1 received shares of Company on Date2. Trust1 then sold all of its Company
PLR-129434-11
2
shares to Trust2 on Date3. Trust2 also received Company shares as gifts on Date3. Trust1 and Trust2 (collectively “Trusts”) failed to make timely elections to be treated as Qualified Subchapter S Trusts (QSST). As a result, Company’s S corporation election terminated as of Date2.
Company represents that the failure to file correct QSST elections was inadvertent and not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. For all relevant taxable years, Company and Company’s shareholders’ filed their federal income tax returns consistent with Company qualifying as an S corporation, and Trusts have filed consistent with Trusts having valid QSST elections in effect as of Date2. In addition, Company and Company’s shareholders agree to make any adjustments consistent with the treatment of Company as an S corporation as may be required by the Secretary with respect to the period specified by § 1362(f).
LAW
Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the termination of Company’s S corporation on Date2 was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). We further hold that, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), Company will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from Date2 and thereafter, provided Company’s S corporation election was valid and provided that the election was not otherwise terminated under § 1361(d).
This ruling is conditioned upon on the trustees of Trusts filing valid QSST elections, effective Date2, with the appropriate service center within 120 days of the
PLR-129434-11
3
date of this letter. If Company or its shareholders fail to treat themselves as described above, this ruling is null and void.
Except as specifically ruled above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the transactions described above under any other provisions of the Code. This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. -------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter to Company’s authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Richard T. Probst
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for Section 6110 purposes
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace