PLR 201216032: IRS restores S corporation status after an inadvertent termination

Number
201216032
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 1366, § 1367, § 1368, § 6110
Ruling dated
January 10, 2012
Publicly released
April 20, 2012

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation's S corporation election was inadvertently terminated when an ineligible shareholder acquired its stock. The corporation later redeemed all of that shareholder's stock and represented that the termination was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. The IRS ruled that the termination was inadvertent and that the corporation would continue to be treated as an S corporation under IRC § 1362(f), subject to the election having been valid and not otherwise terminated. The ruling also required the corporation and its shareholders to make specified income, basis, distribution, and amended-return adjustments.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation's S corporation election be treated as continuing after an inadvertent termination caused by an ineligible shareholder?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to stated conditions
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361, 1362(f), 1366, 1367, and 1368.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201216032
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/20/2012
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 1362.04-00
------------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
-----------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
---------------
CC:PSI:B02
-----------------------------
PLR-150965-11
-----------------------------------
Date:
January 10, 2012

LEGEND

X = --------------
----------------------

a = -----------------------
---------------------------------------------------

b = --------------------
---------------------------------------------------

c = -----------------
---------------------------------------------------

d = ---------------------------------
-----------------------

State = -------------

Date 1 = -----------------

Date 2 = ------------------

Date 3 = --------------------------

Dear -----------------:

This responds to a letter dated September 29, 2011, and additional correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.
PLR-150965-11
2

The information submitted states that X was incorporated in State on Date 1. X made an election to be treated as an S corporation effective Date 1. a, b, and c are eligible shareholders. X’s election was inadvertently terminated effective Date 2 when d, an ineligible shareholder, acquired X stock. On Date 3, X redeemed all of the stock held by d.

X represents that the termination was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments that the Commissioner may require, consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the termination of X’s S corporation election on Date 2 was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). We further hold that, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from Date 1 and thereafter, provided X’s S corporation election was valid and provided that the election was not otherwise terminated under § 1361(d).

This ruling is conditioned upon the shareholders of X including in income their pro rata share of the separately stated and nonseparately computed items of X as provided in § 1366, making any adjustments to basis as provided in § 1367, and taking into account any distributions made by X as provided in § 1368. In addition, a, b, and c, must take into account their pro rata share of the separately stated and nonseparately computed items of X between Date 2 and Date 3 as if d was never a shareholder. Any necessary amended returns of a, b, or c consistent with this ruling must be filed within 120 days of the date of this letter. A copy of this letter should be attached to any such returns. If X or its shareholders fail to treat themselves as described above, this letter
PLR-150965-11
3

ruling shall be null and void.

Except as specifically ruled above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the transactions described above under any other provisions of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Pursuant to a power of attorney on file, a copy of this letter is being sent to X’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Bradford R. Poston
Senior Counsel, Branch 2
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace