PLR 201214020: Corporation X and its subsidiaries may file a consolidated return after a distribution and merger

Number
201214020
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Definitions and includible corporation status
Code sections
§ 1504
Ruling dated
January 9, 2012
Publicly released
April 6, 2012

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered whether a corporation that had distributed stock and later merged into another corporation could be treated as the common parent of a consolidated federal income tax return. The surviving corporation had elected REIT status before the merger, then lost that status retroactively for a later tax year. The IRS ruled that the distributed corporation would not be treated as a successor to the distributing corporation for purposes of IRC § 1504(a)(3). As a result, beginning in the later year, the surviving corporation and qualifying subsidiaries could elect to file a consolidated return with it as common parent.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could Corporation X and qualifying subsidiaries elect to file a consolidated federal income tax return after the distribution and merger?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1504, including §§ 1504(a)(2), 1504(a)(3), and 1504(b)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201214020
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/6/2012
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 1504.00-00, 1504.02-00
------------------------, ID No. -------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
--------------------------
Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------------------- CC:CORP:4
------------------------
PLR-151947-11
--------------
Date:
------------------------
January 09, 2012

Legend

Controlled = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Distributing = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

MergeCo = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

Corporation X = ---------------------------------------------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Dear --------------:

This letter responds to your December 14, 2011 request for rulings. The information submitted in that request and in later correspondence is summarized below.

The rulings contained in this letter are based on facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the materials submitted in support of the request for rulings. Verification of the information, representations, and other data may be required as part of the audit process.

Facts

In a letter ruling dated April 14, 2009 (PLR-143744-08) (the “Prior Letter Ruling”), we ruled on the federal income tax consequences of a proposed distribution of the stock of Controlled by Distributing (the “Distribution”) and a proposed merger of Controlled into MergeCo with MergeCo surviving (the “Merger”). Prior to Year 1, MergeCo elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes. Following the Merger, MergeCo changed its name to Corporation X and continued to operate as a REIT. Corporation X operated as a REIT until Year 2. During Year 2, Corporation X failed to qualify as a REIT. Corporation X’s REIT status was effectively revoked retroactively for all of Corporation X’s Year 2 taxable year.

Rulings

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we rule as follows:

Following the Distribution, Controlled will not be considered a successor to Distributing for purposes of section 1504(a)(3). As a result, beginning in Year 2, Corporation X and its subsidiaries that are “includible corporations” under section 1504(b) and satisfy the ownership requirements of section 1504(a)(2), may elect to file a consolidated federal income tax return with Corporation X as the common parent.

Caveats

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

Procedural Statements

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

_____
Isaac W. Zimbalist
Senior Technical Reviewer, Branch 5
Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace