Private Letter Ruling 1214002 Released April 6, 2012 Approved

PLR 1214002: IRS grants late taxable REIT subsidiary election relief

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered a REIT and its wholly owned subsidiary's request for more time to elect taxable REIT subsidiary status. The company's accountant mistakenly believed the election could be filed with the REIT's federal return, and the Form 8875 deadline passed. The IRS found good cause and granted an extension to the date the form was actually filed, with the requested earlier effective date, provided the subsidiary filed a return as a taxable REIT subsidiary for the earlier year. The ruling was limited to the election's timeliness and did not decide whether the company otherwise qualified as a REIT.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the REIT and subsidiary make a late election for taxable REIT subsidiary treatment with the requested effective date?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 856(l); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Form 8875

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201214002 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/6/2012 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Person To Contact:
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 856.07-00 ------------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
------------------ -------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------- CC:FIP:2
-------------------------------- PLR-127099-11
-------------------- Date:
--------------------------------- December 28, 2011

Legend:

Company = ----------------------------------


Sub = -----------------------------------------

State = -------------

Date 1 = -------------------------

Date 2 = -----------------------

Date 3 = ---------------------------

Date 4 = ------------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Dear -------------:
PLR-127099-11 2

   This is in reply to a letter dated June 10, 2011, requesting on behalf of Company

and Sub an extension of time under section 301.9100-1 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to file an election for Sub to be treated as a taxable real
estate investment trust subsidiary (“TRS”) of Company under section 856(l) of the
Internal Revenue Code.

                                    FACTS

    Company and its wholly owned subsidiary Sub are State corporations. Company

timely elected under section 856 of the Code to be treated as a real estate investment
trust (“REIT”) effective Date 1. Company’s primary business is owning and leasing real
properties in several states.

   On Date 1 Company appointed Sub to act as property manager and leasing

agent for its properties. Both Company and Sub intended that Sub be treated as a TRS
as of Date 1 by filing Form 8875, Taxable REIT Subsidiary Election.

   Company’s tax accountant believed that the election would be timely filed if it

were filed with Company’s Year 1 federal income tax return. However, when preparing
Company’s Year 2 federal income tax return in the fall of Year 2, the accountant learned
that the Form 8875 had not been filed and that the due date for its filing had been Date
2, which was earlier than the due date for filing Company’s Year 1 federal income tax
return. On learning this information the accountant consulted Company’s tax adviser.

    On the advice of the tax adviser Company filed Form 8875 on Date 3, indicating

an effective date for Year 2. Sub subsequently filed a return for Year 2 as a TRS. Sub
filed no return for Year 1, its start-up year, because Sub had a net loss. Following an
extensive investigation of what caused the failure to timely make the TRS election,
Company’s board of directors approved filing a request for an extension of time to file
the Form 8875 on Date 4.

  Company has submitted the affidavit of its tax accountant in support of the

requested extension.

    The following representations are made in connection with the request for the

relief of an extension of time:

  1. The request for relief was filed before the failure to make the regulatory
  election was discovered by the Internal Revenue Service.

  2. Granting the relief requested will not result in Company or Sub having a lower
  tax liability in the aggregate for all years to which the election applies than the

PLR-127099-11 3

   taxpayers would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into
   account the time value of money).

   3. Company and Sub do not seek to alter a return position for which an
   accuracy-related penalty has been or could have been imposed under section
   6662 of the Code at the time the taxpayers requested relief and the new position
   requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested.

   4. Being fully informed of the required regulatory election and related tax
   consequences, Company and Sub did not choose to not file the election.

                               LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Section 856(l) of the Code provides that a REIT and a corporation (other than a

REIT) may jointly elect to treat such corporation as a taxable REIT subsidiary. To be
eligible for treatment as a taxable REIT subsidiary, section 856(l)(1) provides that the
REIT must directly or indirectly own stock in the corporation, and the REIT and the
corporation must jointly elect such treatment. The election is irrevocable once made,
unless both the REIT and the subsidiary consent to its revocation. In addition, the
election and the revocation may be made without the consent of the Secretary.

    In Announcement 2001-17, 2001-1 C.B. 716, the Internal Revenue Service

(Service) announced the availability of Form 8875, Taxable REIT Subsidiary Election.
According to the Announcement, this form is to be used for tax years beginning after
2000 for eligible entities to elect treatment as a taxable REIT subsidiary. The
instructions to Form 8875 provide that the subsidiary and the REIT can make the
election at any time during the tax year. The instructions further provide that the
effective date of the election cannot be more than 2 months and 15 days prior to the
date of filing the elections, or more than 12 months after the date of filing the election. If
no date is specified on the form, the election is effective on the date the form is filed with
the Service. Officers of both the REIT and the taxable REIT subsidiary must jointly sign
the form, which is filed with the IRS Service Center in Ogden, Utah.

   Section 301.9100-1(c) of the regulations provides that the Commissioner has

discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election (defined
in section 301.9100-1(b) as an election whose deadline is prescribed by regulations or
by a revenue ruling, a revenue procedure, a notice, or an announcement published in
the Internal Revenue Bulletin), or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months
except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal
Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

   Section 301.9100-3(a) through (c)(1)(i) of the regulations sets forth rules that the

Internal Revenue Service generally will use to determine whether, under the facts and
PLR-127099-11 4

circumstances of each situation, the Commissioner will grant an extension of time for
regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of section 301.9100-2. Section
301.9100-3(b) provides that subject to paragraphs (b)(3)(i) through (iii) of section
301.9100-3, when a taxpayer applies for relief under this section before the failure to
make the regulatory election is discovered by the Service, the taxpayer will be deemed
to have acted reasonably and in good faith; and section 301.9100-3(c) provides that the
interests of the government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in the taxpayer
having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all years to which the regulatory election
applies than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking
into account the time value of money).

                                   CONCLUSION

   Based upon the facts and representations submitted, and provided that Sub files

a return as a TRS for Year 1, we conclude that Company and Sub have shown good
cause for granting a reasonable extension of time to Date 3 to elect to have Sub be
treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary under section 856(l) of the Code. We further
conclude that Date 1, the date on which Company intended to have Sub treated as its
TRS, is the effective date of the TRS election.

   This ruling is limited to the timeliness of the filing of Company and Sub’s income

tax returns for purposes of the election under section 856(l) of the Code. This ruling’s
application is limited to the facts, representations, Code sections, and regulations cited
herein. No opinion is expressed with regard to whether Company otherwise qualifies as
a REIT under subchapter M of the Code.

    No opinion is expressed with regard to whether the tax liability of Company or

Sub is not lower in the aggregate for all years to which the election applies than such
tax liability would have been if the election had been timely made (taking into account
the time value of money). Upon audit of the federal income tax returns involved, the
director’s office will determine such tax liability for the years involved. If the director’s
office determines that such tax liability is lower, that office will determine the federal
income tax effect.

  Except as specifically provided otherwise, no opinion is expressed on the federal

income tax consequences of the transaction described above.

   This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)

of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-127099-11 5

    In accordance with the terms of a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of

this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

                               Sincerely yours,

                               Jonathan D. Silver
                               Assistant Branch Chief, Branch 2
                               Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                               (Financial Institutions and Products)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.