CCA 1212013: IRS advises on correcting prohibited transactions involving a plan

Plain-English summary

The Office of Chief Counsel advised on how to identify and correct possible prohibited transactions involving a plan, limited partnerships, and compensation paid to a taxpayer. It stated that the first question is whether the prohibited transaction occurred when the plan bought partnership interests or when a partnership paid compensation. Correction generally means undoing the transaction to the extent possible and, in all events, leaving the plan no worse off than if the disqualified person had acted with the highest fiduciary standards. The advice states that a prohibited transfer of property to a qualified plan cannot be self-corrected when rescission remains possible, and that an affirmative act to undo the transaction is required.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: What transactions may be prohibited, and what correction is required when a plan has engaged in them?
• Outcome: Advice given.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 4975(e)(2)(G) and 4975(f)(5); Treas. Reg. §§ 53.4941(e)-1(c)(1) and 141.4975-13; 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-121207-11 Number: 201212013
Release Date: 3/23/2012
Office: -------------------------
UILC: 4975.00-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Wednesday December 21, 2011 2:07 PM
To: ------------------
Cc:
Subject: RE: Advice on correction of prohibited transaction

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.

To determine "correction" in this case, we first have to determine what the prohibited
transactions ("PTs") were. Whether there was a PT when the plan purchased the
interest in the two limited partnerships or was it when the limited partnership paid the
taxpayer the $----------in compensation. Attached are two Department of Labor
("DOL") Advisory Opinions, (DOL Advisory Opinion 2006-01A (January 6, 2006) and
DOL Advisory Opinion 2000-10A (July 27, 2000) that would indicate that there maybe
was a PT (1)at the time the plan purchased its interest in the limited partnerships, if the
limited partnerships were disqualified persons at the time of the sale (see section
4975(e)(2)(G)) and/or(2) a PT at the time the limited partnerships paid compensation
to the taxpayer.

Section 4975(f)(5) and Treas. Reg. Reg. section 53.4941(e)-1(c)(1); Temp. Treas

Reg. section 141.4975-13 provides that the term "correction" and "correct" mean, with
respect to a prohibited transaction, undoing the transaction to the extent possible, but in
any case placing the plan in a financial position not worse than that in which it would be
if the disqualified person were acting with the highest fiduciary standards.

I have also attached Zabolotny v. Commissioner, 7 F.3rd 774 (8th Cir. 1993) that
addressed what is correction. However, see the attached AOD on Zabolotny that
expresses the Service's position on correction and that the Service will not follow the
decision of the Eighth Circuit except in that Circuit. It is the Service's view that a
prohibited transaction involving a disqualified person's transfer of property to a qualified
plan cannot self-correct. Treas. Reg. § 53.4941(e)- l(c)(1); Temp. Reg. § 141.4975-13.
As long as rescission is possible, e.g., there has been no transfer to a bona fide
purchaser for value, some affirmative act to undo the prohibited transaction is required.
Leib v. Commissioner , 88 T.C. 1474, 1483 (1987); Zabolotny v. Commissioner, 97 T.C.
385, 399 (1991).

Give me a call at ---------------------so that I can walk you through what I think are the
possible PTS in this case and discuss correction.