CCA 1211018: Counsel explains transferee liability when no deficiency was assessed

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advice addresses whether the absence of a deficiency assessment prevents the IRS from pursuing transferee liability. The advice states that the absence of a deficiency is not dispositive because IRC § 6901 is not limited to deficiency situations. It explains that § 6901(b) covers tax shown on a return as well as a deficiency or underpayment. The advice also concludes that an assessment under § 6201(a)(3) is an assessment of a tax.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Can transferee liability apply when no deficiency was assessed, and is a § 6201(a)(3) assessment an assessment of a tax?
• Outcome: Advice given.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 6901, 6901(b), and 6201(a)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

                                                  1

ID: CCA_2012021512470520 Number: 201211018
Release Date: 3/16/2012
Office: --------------
UILC: 6901.01-00, 6201.01-00

From: --------------------
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 12:48:30 PM
To: ---------------------------
Cc: ---------------
Subject: RE: Transferee Liability - Tax Court Jurisdiction Question

In your case there was no deficiency assessed against the taxpayer, i.e., there was overstated
withholding, subject to summary assessment, treated like a math error (except that the
abatement/deficiency rule does not apply). You asked about the import of there being no deficiency.
The absence of a deficiency is not dispositive. Note that section 6901 is not limited to deficiency
situations. Section 6901(b) provides that \"Any liability referred to in subsection (a) may be either as to
the amount of tax shown on a return or as to any deficiency or underpayment of any tax.\"

Hopefully that answers your question. But perhaps your question was not so much about the presence or
absence of a deficiency but rather whether a section 6201(a)(3) assessment is an assessment of a tax.
Assessment under section 6201(a)(3) is assessment of a tax, as we concluded in an earlier advisory
opinion, IRS CCA 199910042, 1999 WL 140640, (IRS CCA), March 12, 1999 (attached.)
If you would like to discuss this further, please let me know.
\f