Determination Letter 1210044 Released March 9, 2012 Denied Transcribed from scan

Written determination 1210044: Solar energy program denied 501(c)(3) exemption

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS denied tax-exempt status to an organization that planned to provide residential solar energy systems to low and moderate income households. The organization said its program would alleviate poverty, support community development, and preserve the environment. The IRS concluded that the program did not primarily serve a charitable class, did not show how distributing solar systems would provide community development, and did not establish a direct, measurable environmental benefit. Because the organization was not operated exclusively for exempt purposes under IRC § 501(c)(3), donors could not deduct contributions under IRC § 170.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does the proposed residential solar energy program qualify the organization for exemption under IRC § 501(c)(3)?
  • Outcome: Denied.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(c)(3), 170, 6110, and 7428; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1), 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1), and 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2); Rev. Ruls. 67-138, 68-14, 70-585, 72-560, and 76-204; Rev. Proc. 2011-9, § 4.03.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Number: 201210044 Contact Person:
Release Date: 3/9/2012
Identification Number:
Date: December 16, 2011
Contact Number:
Uniform Issue List Number:
501.00-00 Employer Identification Number:
501.03-00
Form Required To Be Filed:

Tax Years:

Dear :

This is our final determination that you do not qualify for exemption from Federal income tax as
an organization described in Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3). Recently, we sent you a
letter in response to your application that proposed an adverse determination. The letter
explained the facts, law and rationale, and gave you 30 days to file a protest. Since we did not
receive a protest within the requisite 30 days, the proposed adverse determination is now final.

Because you do not qualify for exemption as an organization described in Code section
501(c)(3), donors may not deduct contributions to you under Code section 170. You must file
Federal income tax returns on the form and for the years listed above within 30 days of this
letter, unless you request an extension of time to file. File the returns in accordance with their
instructions, and do not send them to this office. Failure to file the returns timely may result in a
penalty.

We will make this letter and our proposed adverse determination letter available for public
inspection under Code section 6110, after deleting certain identifying information. Please read
the enclosed Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose, and review the two attached letters that
show our proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the
instructions in Notice 437. If you agree with our deletions, you do not need to take any further
action.

If you have any questions about this letter, please contact the person whose name and
telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter. If you have any questions about your
Federal income tax status and responsibilities, please contact IRS Customer Service at

2

1-800-829-1040 or the IRS Customer Service number for businesses, 1-800-829-4933. The
IRS Customer Service number for people with hearing impairments is 1-800-829-4059.

Sincerely,

Lois G. Lerner
Director, Exempt Organizations

Enclosure
Notice 437
Redacted Proposed Adverse Determination Letter
Redacted Final Adverse Determination Letter

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

DIVISION
Date: November 8, 2011 Contact Person:

Identification Number:
Uniform Issue List Number:
501.00-00 Contact Number:
501.03-00

FAX Number:

Employer Identification Number:

Dear :

We have considered your application for recognition of exemption from Federal income tax
under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”). Based on the information provided,
we have concluded that you do not qualify for exemption under § 501(c)(3). The basis for our
conclusion is set forth below.

Facts:

You, Taxpayer, are a not for profit corporation organized under the laws of State on Date. You
submitted a Form 1023 requesting recognition of exemption under § 501(c)(3). Your Articles of
Incorporation contain both a purpose and dissolution clause, but lack a prohibition on inurement.

According to your Articles of Incorporation, you were formed for “charitable, educational, or
scientific purposes.” Specifically, you will provide “residential solar energy systems to low to
middle class income households in County.” You state that your primary missions are to
“alleviate poverty, provide for community development, and to conserve the environment.”
According to your mission statement, you “provide[] an opportunity for all County households to
utilize ‘green’ technology, regardless of the financial condition of the family.”

In order to qualify for these solar systems, you initially represented that household income must
be less than $30,000, though you also provided that this figure “isn’t an exact benchmark” and
“may be adjusted as determined by the board.” You provided that you would verify income
amounts, most likely using tax return information.

You later represented that you will follow the Area Median Income (“AMI”) published by the US
Dept. of Housing and Urban Development in determining eligibility, though you will “not limit

2

[your] services solely to low income households” (i.e. those earning less than $30,000 a year).
Rather, you provided that you would instead provide solar systems to low and moderate income
households not to exceed 120% of the AMI. You did not provide a percentage estimate of how
many households would be classified as low income versus the number that would be moderate
income. You stated that priority will be given to the “lesser incomed (sic) of two otherwise
equally-eligible participants in every case.” You will not provide services to households defined
as middle income or above.

Homeowners must submit an application to be considered for your services. You also require
that applicant households must meet other criteria as well. These include minimum standards
of efficiency, southern exposure to the sun, and adequate roof space and strength.

The application includes a statement of income, household size, the average electrical bill
amount, and pictures denoting orientation. Because you anticipate having more applicants than
available solar systems, you will assign a number upon eligibility verification to applicants.
Random drawings will be conducted to select which eligible homeowners will receive a system.

The solar systems, at all times, will remain your property. If a homeowner moves, the solar
system stays with the home (provided that the new homeowner qualifies for the system and
wishes to retain the system). You have also provided that if the financial circumstances of the
homeowners changes due to events such as winning the lottery that the system will be moved
to a new qualified home.

Any overproduction to the grid from the solar systems will be sold to Company, the local power
company. A monthly dividend check will then be provided to you as per Company's dual
metering plan. The overproduction monies will then be used to purchase additional solar
systems.

While you initially planned on selling carbon offsets, it is not something that you currently plan to
do. You indicated that you would submit a written ruling request on whether the activity is
taxable as unrelated business income should you decide to conduct that activity in the future.

LAW:

Section 501(c)(3) of the Code provides that corporations will be exempted from tax if they are
“organized and operated exclusively for . . . charitable” purposes and “no part of the net
earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual... .”

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations (“regulations”) provides in “order to
be exempt as an organization described in § 501(c)(3), an organization must be both organized
and operated exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in such section. If an
organization fails to meet either the organizational test or the operational test, it is not exempt.”

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the regulations provides “[a]n organization will be regarded as
operated exclusively for one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities
which accomplish one or more of such exempt purposes specified in § 501(c)(3). An
organization will not be so regarded if more than an insubstantial part of its activities is not in
furtherance of an exempt purpose.”

3

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2) of the regulations defines the term “charitable” as including the
promotion of social welfare by organizations designed to relieve the poor and distressed or the
underprivileged, to lessen neighborhood tensions, to eliminate prejudice and discrimination, or
to combat community deterioration.

Rev. Rul. 67-138, 1967-1 C.B. 129 held that helping low-income persons obtain adequate and
affordable housing is a “charitable” activity because it relieves the poor and distressed or
underprivileged.

In Rev. Rul. 68-14, 1968-1 C.B. 243 an organization that planted trees in public areas and
assisting municipal authorities in their programs to plant trees and keep the city clean was
lessening the burdens of government. The organization's informational program directed to the
public, architects, and builders was deemed educational. And, the overall effect of the
organization’s activities was to combat community deterioration. Accordingly, the organization
was exempt from tax under § 501(c)(3).

Rev. Rul. 70-585, 1970-2 C.B. 115, discussed four situations of organizations providing housing
and whether each qualified as charitable within the meaning of § 501(c)(3). Situation 1
described an organization formed to construct new homes and renovate existing homes for sale
to low-income families who could not obtain financing through conventional channels. The
revenue ruling held that by providing homes for low-income families who otherwise could not
afford them, the organization relieved the poor and distressed.

Situation 2 described an organization formed to ameliorate the housing needs of minority
groups by building housing units for sale to persons of low and moderate income on an open-
occupancy basis. The housing was made available to members of minority groups who were
unable to obtain adequate housing because of local discrimination. The housing units were
located to help reduce racial and ethnic imbalances in the community. As the activities were
designed to eliminate prejudice and discrimination and to lessen neighborhood tensions, the
revenue ruling held that the organization was engaged in charitable activities within the meaning
of § 501(c)(3).

Situation 3 described an organization formed to formulate plans for the renewal and
rehabilitation of a particular area in a city as a residential community. The median income level
in the area was lower than in other sections of the city and the housing in the area generally
was old and badly deteriorated. The organization developed an overall plan for the
rehabilitation of the area, sponsored a renewal project, and involved residents in the area
renewal plan. The organization also purchased an apartment building that it rehabilitated and
rented at cost to low and moderate income families with a preference given to residents of the
area. The revenue ruling held that the organization was described in § 501(c)(3) because its
purposes and activities combated community deterioration.

4

Situation 4 described an organization formed to alleviate a shortage of housing for moderate-
income families in a particular community. The organization planned to build housing to be
rented at cost to moderate-income families. The revenue ruling held that the organization failed
to qualify for exemption under § 501(c)(3) because the organization's program was not
designed to provide relief to the poor or further any other charitable purpose within the meaning
of § 501(c)(3) and the regulations.

In Rev. Rul. 72-560, 1972-2 C.B. 248, an organization that provided information to the public
concerning environmental problems caused by solid waste materials and the advantages of
recycling such materials, was found to be instructing the public on subjects useful to the
individual and beneficial to the community. The recycling of the waste materials is an essential
element in the organization's efforts to combat environmental deterioration, since it prevents the
pollution of the environment caused by the usual disposition of these materials.

In Rev. Rul. 76-204, 1976-1 C.B. 152, an organization was formed for the purpose of preserving
the natural environment. The organization accomplished this purpose by acquiring and
maintaining ecologically significant and undeveloped land such as swamps, marshes, forests,
wilderness tracts, and other natural areas. The organization worked closely with Federal, state,
and local government agencies, and private organizations that were also concerned with
environmental conservation. The ruling reasoned that by preserving “ecologically significant
undeveloped land, the organization is enhancing the accomplishment of express national policy
of conserving the nation's unique natural resources.” Thus, the ruling concluded that the
“organization is advancing education and science and is benefiting the public in a manner that
the law regards as charitable.”

Rev. Proc. 2011-9, 2011-2 I.R.B. 283, section 4.03 provides that exempt status may be
recognized in advance of the organization’s operations if its proposed operations are described
in sufficient detail to permit a conclusion that it will clearly meet the particular requirements for
exemption pursuant to the section of the Code under which exemption is claimed. Section
4.03(2) states that the organization must fully describe all of the activities in which it expects to
engage, including the standards, criteria, procedures or other means adopted or planned for
carrying out the activities, the anticipated sources of receipts, and the nature of contemplated
expenditures.

ANALYSIS:

Organizations described in § 501(c)(3) must be both organized and operated exclusively for one
or more of the purposes specified in such section. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1). Pursuant to §
1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1), an organization will only be regarded as “operated exclusively” for charitable
purposes if it engages primarily in activities that accomplish one or more of such exempt
purposes specified in § 501(c)(3). “Charitable” purposes is defined as including the promotion
of social welfare by organizations designed to relieve the poor and distressed or the
underprivileged, to lessen neighborhood tensions, to eliminate prejudice and discrimination, or
to combat community deterioration. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2). Charitable purposes may also
include environmental preservation and promotion. Rev. Rul. 76-204, supra.

You are not operated exclusively for exempt purposes as defined by § 501(c)(3) and §
1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2). Your primary activity is the provision of residential solar energy systems to
low and moderate income households in County. You state that this activity alleviates poverty,
provides for community development, and preserves the environment.

Your activity does not alleviate poverty. In an analogous situation, the provision of housing was
determined to be exempt as relieving the poor and distressed in certain circumstances such as
providing new and renovated homes to low income families who could not obtain conventional
financing, providing homes to low and moderate income groups to reduce racial and ethnic
imbalances in a community, and providing apartments to low and moderate income families in a

5

particular deteriorated area of a city in an effort to combat community deterioration. Rev. Rul.
70-585, supra.

However, that ruling also provided that an organization who built and rented homes for
moderate income families did not qualify for exemption because it was not relieving the poor
and distressed and was not furthering any other charitable purpose. Similarly, you provide
services to moderate income homes. While you also provide services to low income
households, you do not do so in a way that would reduce racial and ethnic imbalances or
combat community deterioration. Additionally, you do not provide a breakdown of the number of
homes you expect will be moderate income versus the number that are low income. While you
state that low income applicants would be given a preference over equally eligible moderate
income applicants, this does not provide any guarantee that your services will primarily serve a
charitable class.

You state that this activity provides for community development. However, you do not explain
how providing solar panels throughout County accomplishes your goal of community
development. In a grant application you submitted, you do provide that you have a
“transformative impact” on your community because you would “free up significant amounts of
disposable income” for the families who receive your systems. You also state that the systems
would “add considerable equity to each home which receives a system.” While these may be
benefits of your program, there is no indication that these activities provide for community
development as meant by § 501(c)(3). Any benefits resulting from your program would primarily
be in the form of potential financial savings to a select group of homeowners who use your solar
systems, rather than general community development. Section 4.03 of Rev. Proc. 2011-9,
supra, provides that exempt status may be recognized in advance of the organization’s
operations if its proposed operations are described in sufficient detail to permit a conclusion that
it will clearly meet the particular requirements for exemption pursuant to the section of the Code
under which exemption is claimed. The information provided by you is not sufficient to permit a
conclusion that you are engaged in activities that provide for community development in an
exempt manner.

You state that your activity preserves the environment. Organizations that promote or protect
the environment have been recognized as exempt. See Rev. Rul. 68-14, supra (planting trees
to combat community deterioration); Rev. Rul. 72-560, supra (providing education information
on solid waste recycling); Rev. Rul. 76-204, supra (acquiring and preserving ecologically
significant land). However, the activities of those organizations are different than your activities.
The organizations described in each of these revenue rulings provided a direct environmental
benefit to the public as a result of its activities. While the environmental benefits of your
activities would be indirect and tangential. Moreover, you have provided no credible studies or
research to show that use of your particular solar systems would have a measurable, significant
impact in preserving and protecting the environment. As discussed above, exempt status
cannot be recognized in advance of operations if your activities are not described in sufficient
detail to permit a conclusion that you will meet the requirements for § 501(c)(3). See Rev. Proc.
2011-9, supra. The information provided by you is not sufficient to permit a conclusion that you
are engaged in activities that preserve the environment.

CONCLUSION:

Based on the facts and information provided, you are not operated exclusively for exempt
purposes as required by sections 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) and 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the regulations.
Therefore, you are not described in section 501(c)(3).

You have the right to file a protest if you believe this determination is incorrect. To protest, you
must submit a statement of your views and fully explain your reasoning. You must submit the
statement, signed by one of your officers, within 30 days from the date of this letter. We will
consider your statement and decide if the information affects our determination.

Your protest statement should be accompanied by the following declaration:

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this protest statement,
including accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
the statement contains all the relevant facts, and such facts are true, correct, and
complete.

You also have a right to request a conference to discuss your protest. This request should be
made when you file your protest statement. An attorney, certified public accountant, or an
individual enrolled to practice before the Internal Revenue Service may represent you. If you
want representation during the conference procedures, you must file a proper power of attorney,
Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, if you have not already done
so. For more information about representation, see Publication 947, Practice before the IRS
and Power of Attorney. All forms and publications mentioned in this letter can be found at
www.irs.gov, Forms and Publications.

If you do not file a protest within 30 days, you will not be able to file a suit for declaratory
judgment in court because the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will consider the failure to protest
as a failure to exhaust available administrative remedies. Code section 7428(b)(2) provides, in
part, that a declaratory judgment or decree shall not be issued in any proceeding unless the Tax
Court, the United States Court of Federal Claims, or the District Court of the United States for
the District of Columbia determines that the organization involved has exhausted all of the
administrative remedies available to it within the IRS.

If you do not intend to protest this determination, you do not need to take any further action. If
we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will issue a final adverse determination letter. That
letter will provide information about filing tax returns and other matters.

Please send your protest statement, Form 2848 and any supporting documents to this address:

Internal Revenue Service
1111 Constitution Ave, N.W.
Washington, DC 20224

You may also fax your statement using the fax number shown in the heading of this letter. If
you fax your statement, please call the person identified in the heading of this letter to confirm
that he or she received your fax.

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are
shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

Lois G. Lerner
Director, Exempt Organizations

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.