Chief Counsel Advice 1210027 Released March 9, 2012 Advice

CCA 1210027: Expert disclosure of return information

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advice considers whether an expert retained by the IRS may disclose information learned while providing actuarial services in a Tax Court case to an actuarial disciplinary board. The advice treats the documents at issue as return information protected by IRC § 6103 and identifies no Code provision allowing disclosure without the taxpayer's consent. It explains that a taxpayer may provide written consent under IRC § 6103(c) and the cited regulation. It also permits use of information actually taken from a public court record, but says the expert must obtain those documents from the court and may not use copies from the expert's own records.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May an IRS-retained expert disclose case information to an actuarial disciplinary board?
  • Outcome: Advice given.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6103; IRC § 6103(b)(2); IRC § 6103(c); Treas. Reg. § 301.6103(c)-1; Lampert v. United States, 854 F.2d 335, 338 (9th Cir. 1988).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-127215-12 Number: 201210027
Release Date: 3/9/2012
Office: --------------
UILC: 6103.01-03

From: --------------------
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 2:15 PM
To: ---------------------
Cc: -----------------------------
Subject: Response to request for advice under 6103


We received your request for request for advice on whether an expert retained by the IRS to provide
actuarial services in a Tax Court case may disclose information obtained from his participation in this
case to the actuarial disciplinary board.

It is our understanding that the expert was hired to review the work of petitioner’s actuary and provide
expert witness services in a case being handled by your office. The expert signed a section 6103(n)
contract in which he agreed to treat as confidential and not disclose any returns or return information
made available to him for the purpose of carrying out his contract. Based on information the expert
acquired during the performance of his contract, the expert indicated that he believed petitioner’s actuary
had committed a professional violation and wished to refer petitioner’s actuary to the actuarial board for
disciplinary proceedings. In order to make the referral, the expert would need to disclose to the board
items prepared by petitioner’s actuary and potentially other supporting documents prepared or acquired
during the course of the case. The case at issue was settled.

I.R.C. § 6103 prohibits the disclosure of returns or return information except as authorized by the Code.
Return information is any information gathered by, collected by, created by, or otherwise in the hands of
the Secretary in connection with determining a taxpayer’s liability or potential liability under the Code.
I.R.C. § 6103(b)(2). In this case, it appears as if everything the expert may want to disclose to the
actuarial board is return information under the Code. All of the documents referenced were acquired or
created in the course of determining the taxpayer’s liability under the Code. We are unaware of any
provision of the Code which would allow the expert to disclose, without consent of the taxpayer, the return
information in this case to the actuary board.

A taxpayer may give the IRS consent to disclose his return information to a designated third party. I.R.C.
§ 6103(c). In order to provide consent, the taxpayer must execute a written consent which meets all the
requirements in Treas. Reg. § 301.6103(c)-1. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lastly, the expert may obtain information from the public record to make a referral to the actuary board.
The IRS’s position is that I.R.C. § 6103 does not ban the disclosure of information actually taken from the
public record but has confined its position to information in the public record as the result of collection
activities or judicial tax proceedings. See, e.g., Lampert v. United States, 854 F.2d 335, 338 (9th Cir.
1988). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2

------------------ Under no circumstances may the expert use copies of the documents from his own
records. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

In sum, I.R.C. § 6103 prohibits the expert from disclosing any return or return information in this case
except if the taxpayer consents to the disclosure or if the information is taken from the public record. If
the expert wishes to use information contained in the public court record, he must request the documents
from the court and only use the versions provided by the court.

Thanks and have a great day,

----------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------


Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.