CCA 1207008: Chief Counsel addressed partnership-level negligence penalties
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advised that a partnership generally does not have an underpayment of tax for purposes of the negligence penalty because the partnership itself pays no income tax. In a TEFRA proceeding, the IRS instead determines penalties against the partners based on partnership-level facts, such as negligence by the partnership acting through its managers. The advice identified a limited exception for withholding taxes under IRC §§ 1446 and 1461, which can be an underpayment directly assessable against the partnership.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: When may a negligence penalty be assessed directly against a partnership?
- Outcome: advice
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 6221, 6662(a), 1446, and 1461
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2012012508350537 Number: 201207008
Release Date: 2/17/2012
Office: ---------
UILC: 6221.00-00, 6662.00-00
From: --------------------
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 8:35:18 AM
To: --------------------
Cc: ------------
Subject: RE: Partnership Penalties
Since the partnership pays no tax, there is typically no "underpayment of tax" by the partnership that
could be subject to the negligence penalty. I.R.C. 6662(a). Instead, in a TEFRA proceeding we are
determining penalties against the partners based on partnership-level determinations, e.g., the
negligence of the partnership acting through its managers.
There is an underpayment of tax by the partnership, however, under sections1446 and 1461 for certain
withholding taxes. That could be subject to a negligence penalty directly assessable against the
partnership. Outside of this limited exception, I am not aware of other circumstances for assessing the
negligence penalty against the partnership.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.