Private Letter Ruling 1206025 Released February 10, 2012 Approved Transcribed from scan

PLR 1206025: IRS waived the 60-day IRA rollover requirement after an adviser misrepresentation

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered a taxpayer's request to waive the 60-day deadline for rolling an IRA distribution into another IRA. The taxpayer deposited the distribution into a checking account after being told that this was required to facilitate the rollover, then relied on an adviser who said an internet transaction had been completed even though the submit step had not been selected. The IRS found that the taxpayer's inability to complete a timely rollover was caused by the adviser's misrepresentation and waived the deadline under section 408(d)(3)(I). The ruling gave the taxpayer 60 days from the ruling date to contribute the amount to a rollover IRA, subject to the other requirements of section 408(d)(3).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the IRS waive the 60-day IRA rollover requirement after an adviser misrepresented that an internet transaction was complete?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 72, 401(a)(9), 408(d)(3), and 6110(k)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16.

Full text (IRS public release)

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 201206025

NOV 18 2011

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

***
***
***
T:EP:RA:T2

Legend:

Taxpayer A ***

IRA X ***

Account Y ***

Financial
Institution P ***

Financial
Institution Q ***

Amount 1 ***
Financial
Advisor Z ***
Date 1 ***
Date 2 ***

Date 3 ***

Dear ***:

This letter is in response to your letter dated July 27, 2010, submitted by your
authorized representative, as supplemented by correspondence on December 14, 2010,


***

Page 2

201206025

January 13, 2011, and April 5, 2011, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day
rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the
"Code").

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested:

Taxpayer A, years old, represents that on Date 1, he received a distribution of
Amount 1 from Financial Institution P and that he intended to roll it over into another IRA
at Financial Institution Q. He represents that his failure to accomplish a rollover of
Amount 1 within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the Code was due
to a misrepresentation made by Financial Advisor Z. Taxpayer A asserts that Amount 1
has not been used for any purpose.

Taxpayer A asserts that Financial Institution Q required him to open Account Y, a
checking account, in order to facilitate a rollover from IRA X into an IRA at

Financial Institution Q. On Date 2, Taxpayer A deposited Amount 1 into Account Y.
Taxpayer A called Financial Institution Q to inquire how he could complete the rollover
of Amount 1 from Account Y to an IRA at Financial Institution Q. Taxpayer A asked his
wife, years old, to assist him with communicating with representatives from
Financial Institution Q, setting up an IRA, and completing the rollover of Amount 1 from
Account Y into that IRA. Taxpayer A asserts that representatives from

Financial Institution Q told them that its preferred method of setting up IRAs and
completing IRA rollovers was by using the Internet.

On Date 3, Taxpayer A and his wife called Financial Institution Q and asked for help
completing the rollover of Amount 1. They worked with Financial Advisor Z on the
telephone to use the Internet to set up an IRA at Financial Institution Q and to complete
the rollover of Amount 1 from Account Y to the new IRA. Taxpayer A asserts that
Financial Advisor Z told them that he could see on his computer screen that they had
accessed Account Y and had transferred Amount 1 to an IRA at Financial Institution Q.
Taxpayer A represents that he relied on Financial Advisor Z’s confirmation that he
successfully completed the rollover of Amount 1. Taxpayer A and his wife inadvertently
did not select the submit option to complete the transaction. Therefore, instead of
establishing an IRA and completing the roll-over as they thought they had done,
Taxpayer A did not establish an IRA at Financial Institution Q and Amount 1 remained in
Account Y. Taxpayer A represents that he believed that Amount 1 was in an IRA at
Financial Institution Q and that he first learned that it instead remained in Account Y
months later when his accountant investigated the Form 1099 associated with the
distribution of Amount 1 from IRA X.

Based on the above facts and representations, Taxpayer A requests a ruling that the
Internal Revenue Service (“Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in
section 408(d)(3) of the Code with respect to the distribution of Amount 1.


***

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section
408(d) of the Code, any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in
gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided
under section 72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) does not apply to any
amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit the IRA is
maintained if:

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the
day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into
such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible
in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3) of the Code).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any
amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at
any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual
received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was
not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section
408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure
to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining
whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section
408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including:


***

Page 4 201206025

(1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to
death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country
or postal error; (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of
payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the
distribution occurred.

The information presented and submitted by Taxpayer A, including documentation
relating to the Internet banking practices of Financial Institution Q, is consistent with the
assertion that his inability to complete a timely rollover was due to a misrepresentation
made by Financial Advisor Z.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the

60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from IRA X.
Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter to
contribute Amount 1 into a Rollover IRA. Provided all other requirements of section
408(d)(3) of the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such
contribution, Amount 1 will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of
section 408(d)(3) of the Code.

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be distributed
by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be
applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling is being
sent to your authorized representative.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact *** at ***-***-****.
Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T2.

Sincerely,

Donzell Littlejohn, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 2

Enclosures:

Deleted copy of ruling letter

Notice of Intention to Disclose


201206025

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.