CCA 1205008: Counsel recommends correcting wage-withholding authorities for health insurance payments
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Office of Chief Counsel reviewed a draft congressional response concerning wage withholding. Counsel recommended removing a citation to IRC § 3401(a)(21), because that provision excepts payments to Archer MSAs and does not address general accident and health insurance. Counsel instead recommended citing Rev. Rul. 56-632, 1956-2 C.B. 101, for the proposition that accident and health insurance is not subject to income tax withholding. A separate reviewer was asked to consider the draft’s paragraph on capital-gains treatment.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Which authorities should support the treatment of accident and health insurance payments for income tax withholding purposes?
- Outcome: advice given
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 3401(a)(21) and 106; Rev. Rul. 56-632, 1956-2 C.B. 101.
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2012011109392732 Number: 201205008
Release Date: 2/3/2012
Office: -------------
UILC: 3401.01-00
From: --------------------
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 9:39:36 AM
To: ---------------
Cc: ----------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Congressional Response for Counsel Review
Thanks -----. The letter looks pretty good to me, but there are a couple of things I noticed. First of all, shouldn't it be ----------------------------------?
Also I think the citation to section 3401(a)(21) should be taken out since it only excepts payments to Archer MSAs only (amounts excepted under section 106(b)). The exception from wages for income tax withholding purposes for general accident and health insurance is not in the Code. We usually cite Rev. Rul. 56-632. 1956-2 C.B. 101 for the proposition that accident and health insurance is not subject to income tax withholding, so I recommend citing that instead of section 3401(a)(21).
I've asked -------------------------from -------to take a look at that paragraph at the end on capital gains treatment, because that is not in my jurisdiction. I'll pass on any comments ------- has as soon as I receive them.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2012, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.