PLR 201203007: Inadvertent S corporation termination disregarded

Number
201203007
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 1366, § 1367, § 1368
Ruling dated
October 17, 2011
Publicly released
January 20, 2012

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2012, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2012
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered an S corporation whose election was inadvertently terminated when two shareholders temporarily ceased to qualify as eligible shareholders. The corporation and its shareholders agreed to make any required adjustments and to continue treating the corporation as an S corporation. The IRS concluded that the termination was inadvertent and allowed the corporation to be treated as an S corporation from the termination date onward, subject to the stated conditions. The corporation and its shareholders had to report income, basis adjustments, and distributions consistently with S corporation treatment, or the ruling would be void.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can an S corporation continue its status after an inadvertent termination caused by temporarily ineligible shareholders?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361, 1362, 1366, 1367, and 1368

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201203007
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/20/2012
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
------------------
----------------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------------------
---------------------
---------------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-128092-11
Date: October 17, 2011

X = -------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------

D1 = ----------------------

Dear -------------:

This responds to a letter dated June 24, 2011, submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representative, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

X made an election to be treated as an S corporation. X’s election was inadvertently terminated effective D1 because two shareholders temporarily ceased to qualify as eligible shareholders. X represents that the termination was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments that the Commissioner may require, consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to
PLR-128092-11
2

§ 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the termination of X’s S corporation election on D1 was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). We further hold that, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from D1 and thereafter, provided X’s S corporation election was valid and provided that the election was not otherwise terminated under § 1361(d).

This ruling is conditioned upon X and all its shareholders treating X as having been an S corporation for the termination period and thereafter. Moreover, the shareholders of X must include their pro rata share of the separately stated and nonseparately computed items of income, loss, deduction, or credit as provided in § 1366, make any adjustments to basis as provided in § 1367, and take into account any distributions made by X as provided in § 1368. If X or its shareholders fail to treat themselves as described above, this ruling is null and void.

Except as specifically ruled above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the transactions described above under any other provisions of the Code. This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Pursuant to a power of attorney on file, we are sending a copy of this letter to X’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,

/s/

Richard T. Probst
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace